Acute and chronic pesticide exposure trigger fundamentally different molecular responses in bumble bee brains.

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY BMC Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1186/s12915-025-02169-z
Alicja Witwicka, Federico López-Osorio, Andres Arce, Richard J Gill, Yannick Wurm
{"title":"Acute and chronic pesticide exposure trigger fundamentally different molecular responses in bumble bee brains.","authors":"Alicja Witwicka, Federico López-Osorio, Andres Arce, Richard J Gill, Yannick Wurm","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02169-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beneficial insects, including pollinators, encounter various pesticide exposure conditions, from brief high-concentration acute exposure to continuous low-level chronic exposure. To effectively assess the environmental risks of pesticides, it is critical to understand how different exposure schemes influence their effects. Unfortunately, this knowledge remains limited. To clarify whether different exposure schemes disrupt the physiology of pollinators in a similar manner, we exposed bumble bees to acute or chronic treatments of three different pesticides: acetamiprid, clothianidin, or sulfoxaflor. Genome-wide gene expression profiling enabled us to compare the effects of these treatments on the brain in a high-resolution manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were two main findings: First, acute and chronic exposure schemes largely affected non-overlapping sets of genes. Second, different pesticides under the same exposure scheme showed more comparable effects than the same pesticide under different exposure schemes. Each exposure scheme induced a distinct gene expression profile. Acute exposure mainly caused upregulation of genes linked to the stress response mechanisms, like peroxidase and detoxification genes, while chronic exposure predominantly affected immunity and energy metabolism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that the mode of exposure is critical in determining the molecular effects of pesticides. These results signal the need for safety testing practices to better consider mode-of-exposure dependent effects and suggest that transcriptomics can support such improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02169-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Beneficial insects, including pollinators, encounter various pesticide exposure conditions, from brief high-concentration acute exposure to continuous low-level chronic exposure. To effectively assess the environmental risks of pesticides, it is critical to understand how different exposure schemes influence their effects. Unfortunately, this knowledge remains limited. To clarify whether different exposure schemes disrupt the physiology of pollinators in a similar manner, we exposed bumble bees to acute or chronic treatments of three different pesticides: acetamiprid, clothianidin, or sulfoxaflor. Genome-wide gene expression profiling enabled us to compare the effects of these treatments on the brain in a high-resolution manner.

Results: There were two main findings: First, acute and chronic exposure schemes largely affected non-overlapping sets of genes. Second, different pesticides under the same exposure scheme showed more comparable effects than the same pesticide under different exposure schemes. Each exposure scheme induced a distinct gene expression profile. Acute exposure mainly caused upregulation of genes linked to the stress response mechanisms, like peroxidase and detoxification genes, while chronic exposure predominantly affected immunity and energy metabolism.

Conclusions: Our findings show that the mode of exposure is critical in determining the molecular effects of pesticides. These results signal the need for safety testing practices to better consider mode-of-exposure dependent effects and suggest that transcriptomics can support such improvements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性和慢性农药暴露会引发大黄蜂大脑中根本不同的分子反应。
背景:包括传粉昆虫在内的益虫会遇到各种农药暴露条件,从短暂的高浓度急性暴露到持续的低水平慢性暴露。为了有效地评估农药的环境风险,了解不同的暴露方案如何影响其影响至关重要。不幸的是,这方面的知识仍然有限。为了弄清不同的暴露方案是否会以类似的方式破坏传粉媒介的生理机能,我们将大黄蜂暴露于三种不同杀虫剂的急性或慢性处理中:啶虫脒、噻虫胺或亚砜。全基因组基因表达谱使我们能够以高分辨率的方式比较这些治疗对大脑的影响。结果:有两个主要发现:首先,急性和慢性暴露方案在很大程度上影响了非重叠的基因组。第二,同一暴露方案下的不同农药比同一农药在不同暴露方案下的可比性更强。每种暴露方案诱导了不同的基因表达谱。急性暴露主要引起与应激反应机制相关的基因上调,如过氧化物酶和解毒基因,而慢性暴露主要影响免疫和能量代谢。结论:我们的研究结果表明,暴露方式是决定农药分子效应的关键。这些结果表明需要安全测试实践来更好地考虑暴露模式依赖效应,并表明转录组学可以支持这种改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
PTBD: a machine learning-based non-invasive diagnostic model for pulmonary tuberculosis using large-scale blood transcriptomes. Revisiting early angiosperm pollination: a reassessment of Angimordella beetle and co-occurring thrips from mid-Cretaceous amber. Proteome dynamics during establishment of California grunion (Leuresthes tenuis) cell lines. The first chromosome-level cubozoan genome differentiates unique and common features in different cnidarian lineages. Generative AI in structure-based drug discovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1