Young doctors' attrition and retention in the GP scheme: a national cohort study from Norway.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1177/14034948251317465
Katrine Skyrud, Torill Rotevatn, Henning Øien, Bjørn-Atle Reme
{"title":"Young doctors' attrition and retention in the GP scheme: a national cohort study from Norway.","authors":"Katrine Skyrud, Torill Rotevatn, Henning Øien, Bjørn-Atle Reme","doi":"10.1177/14034948251317465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Several countries struggle with general practitioner (GP) burnout, recruitment and retention. The reasons are not well understood. The aim of this study was to predict the tenure of young GPs in the GP scheme and detect important predictors for remaining or leaving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Norwegian registries, LASSO Cox regression models were applied to identify variables, including the personal attributes, appointment details, patient profiles and workload indicators of GPs that predicted GP tenure among GPs under 40 years who joined the Norwegian GP scheme between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018. GPs were followed until leaving the scheme or until 31 December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed a total of 2038 GPs aged under 40 years old at recruitment. Of these, 499 (24.5%) resigned by 31 December 2020. The most important predictors for remaining in the GP scheme throughout the follow-up period were (a) having a high activity-based income and (b) being a specialist in general medicine. The most important predictors for leaving the GP scheme were (a) working more than 50 days per year in the emergency room and (b) working in less central areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>High income, specialisation and a large patient base predicted staying in the GP scheme, whereas working in emergency rooms and less central areas predicted leaving. This study suggests that workload within the GP practice is not the main driver of early retirement.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251317465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251317465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Several countries struggle with general practitioner (GP) burnout, recruitment and retention. The reasons are not well understood. The aim of this study was to predict the tenure of young GPs in the GP scheme and detect important predictors for remaining or leaving.

Methods: Using data from Norwegian registries, LASSO Cox regression models were applied to identify variables, including the personal attributes, appointment details, patient profiles and workload indicators of GPs that predicted GP tenure among GPs under 40 years who joined the Norwegian GP scheme between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018. GPs were followed until leaving the scheme or until 31 December 2020.

Results: We followed a total of 2038 GPs aged under 40 years old at recruitment. Of these, 499 (24.5%) resigned by 31 December 2020. The most important predictors for remaining in the GP scheme throughout the follow-up period were (a) having a high activity-based income and (b) being a specialist in general medicine. The most important predictors for leaving the GP scheme were (a) working more than 50 days per year in the emergency room and (b) working in less central areas.

Conclusions: High income, specialisation and a large patient base predicted staying in the GP scheme, whereas working in emergency rooms and less central areas predicted leaving. This study suggests that workload within the GP practice is not the main driver of early retirement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻医生在全科医生计划中的流失和保留:来自挪威的一项国家队列研究。
目的:一些国家与全科医生(GP)倦怠,招聘和保留斗争。原因尚不清楚。本研究的目的是预测年轻全科医生在全科医生计划中的任期,并检测留下或离开的重要预测因素。方法:使用挪威注册中心的数据,应用LASSO Cox回归模型识别变量,包括个人属性、预约详细信息、患者概况和全科医生工作量指标,这些变量预测了2010年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间加入挪威全科医生计划的40岁以下全科医生的全科医生任期。全科医生被跟踪到离开该计划或直到2020年12月31日。结果:我们在招募时共随访了2038名年龄在40岁以下的全科医生。其中,499人(24.5%)在2020年12月31日前辞职。在整个随访期间留在全科医生计划中最重要的预测因素是(a)具有高活动基础收入和(b)是全科医学专家。离开全科医生计划的最重要预测因素是(a)每年在急诊室工作超过50天,(b)在不太中心的地区工作。结论:高收入、专业化和庞大的患者基数预测会留在全科医生计划中,而在急诊室和非中心地区工作的人预测会离开。这项研究表明,全科医生的工作量并不是提前退休的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Subjective social status and common mental disorders in the Swedish working population: gender and age differences in longitudinal associations. Smartphone use and loneliness in life transitions: A biopsychosocial perspective. Do age and birth cohorts influence trends in the job demand-control model, self-rated health, and perceived stress in Sweden? Trends in hip fracture rates in Oslo 2012-2022 across sociodemographic characteristics. Who is worthy of protection? Revisiting a theoretical model on the social origins of health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1