Generative AI for vaccine misbelief correction: Insights from targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127018
Hang Lu
{"title":"Generative AI for vaccine misbelief correction: Insights from targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs","authors":"Hang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Misinformation about vaccines is a significant barrier to public health, fueling hesitancy and resistance. Generative AI offers a scalable tool for assisting public health communicators in crafting targeted correction messages tailored to audience characteristics. This study investigates the effectiveness of AI-generated messages targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs compared to high-quality generic and non-vaccine-related messages.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In a between-subjects experiment, 1435 U.S. adults were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control, generic correction, extraversion-targeting correction, or pseudoscientific-belief-targeting correction. Participants rated their agreement with vaccine misbelief statements before and after exposure to a correction message. AI was used to generate the targeted correction messages, while the generic and control messages were sourced from real-world examples.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Extraversion-targeting messages significantly reduced vaccine misbeliefs, performing comparably to high-quality generic messages, particularly among participants with higher extraversion levels. However, these effects did not extend to general vaccination attitudes. Pseudoscientific-belief-targeting messages were ineffective and, in some cases, backfired, reinforcing negative attitudes among individuals with strong pseudoscientific beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted message generation for crafting effective correction messages, particularly when targeting personality traits like extraversion. However, the findings suggest that certain AI-generated messages may be less effective or even counterproductive when targeting entrenched beliefs, underscoring the need for human oversight in refining AI-generated messages. Future research should explore additional audience characteristics and optimize human-AI collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of AI-generated correction messages in public health communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 127018"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25003159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Misinformation about vaccines is a significant barrier to public health, fueling hesitancy and resistance. Generative AI offers a scalable tool for assisting public health communicators in crafting targeted correction messages tailored to audience characteristics. This study investigates the effectiveness of AI-generated messages targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs compared to high-quality generic and non-vaccine-related messages.

Method

In a between-subjects experiment, 1435 U.S. adults were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control, generic correction, extraversion-targeting correction, or pseudoscientific-belief-targeting correction. Participants rated their agreement with vaccine misbelief statements before and after exposure to a correction message. AI was used to generate the targeted correction messages, while the generic and control messages were sourced from real-world examples.

Results

Extraversion-targeting messages significantly reduced vaccine misbeliefs, performing comparably to high-quality generic messages, particularly among participants with higher extraversion levels. However, these effects did not extend to general vaccination attitudes. Pseudoscientific-belief-targeting messages were ineffective and, in some cases, backfired, reinforcing negative attitudes among individuals with strong pseudoscientific beliefs.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted message generation for crafting effective correction messages, particularly when targeting personality traits like extraversion. However, the findings suggest that certain AI-generated messages may be less effective or even counterproductive when targeting entrenched beliefs, underscoring the need for human oversight in refining AI-generated messages. Future research should explore additional audience characteristics and optimize human-AI collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of AI-generated correction messages in public health communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于疫苗错误信念纠正的生成人工智能:来自针对外倾性和伪科学信念的见解
关于疫苗的错误信息是公共卫生的一个重大障碍,助长了犹豫和抵抗。生成式人工智能提供了一种可扩展的工具,可帮助公共卫生传播者根据受众特征制作有针对性的纠正信息。本研究调查了与高质量的通用和非疫苗相关信息相比,人工智能生成的针对外向性和伪科学信念的信息的有效性。方法在一项受试者间实验中,1435名美国成年人被随机分配到四种情况中的一种:对照组、一般矫正组、外向定向矫正组和伪科学定向矫正组。参与者在接触纠正信息之前和之后对他们对疫苗错误信念陈述的同意程度进行了评级。人工智能用于生成有针对性的纠正信息,而通用和控制信息则来自现实世界的例子。结果与高质量的普通信息相比,针对外倾性的信息显著减少了疫苗误解,特别是在外倾性水平较高的参与者中。然而,这些影响并没有延伸到一般的疫苗接种态度。以伪科学信仰为目标的信息是无效的,在某些情况下,适得其反,强化了具有强烈伪科学信仰的个人的消极态度。这项研究证明了人工智能辅助信息生成在制作有效纠正信息方面的潜力,特别是在针对外向性等人格特征时。然而,研究结果表明,当针对根深蒂固的信念时,某些人工智能生成的信息可能不太有效,甚至适得其反,这强调了在改进人工智能生成的信息时需要人类监督。未来的研究应探索更多的受众特征,并优化人类与人工智能的协作,以提高人工智能生成的纠正信息在公共卫生传播中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Sustained superior humoral immune responses of mRNA vaccines compared to Sputnik V viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in naïve and convalescent populations” [Vaccine 70 (2026) 128018] Association of parental vaccination readiness and descriptive norms with childhood vaccination status Child sexual abuse and adult vaccination: Opposing patterns between routine and pandemic vaccines in a Nationwide survey Protecting infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ireland: Impact of a national nirsevimab immunisation programme, 2024/2025 Vaccination under sedation in children with needle phobia or behavioural difficulties: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1