Why is rumination unhelpful in adolescents? Two studies examining the causal role of abstract processing

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.058
Eleanor Leigh , Lorna Taylor , Victoria Cole , Patrick Smith
{"title":"Why is rumination unhelpful in adolescents? Two studies examining the causal role of abstract processing","authors":"Eleanor Leigh ,&nbsp;Lorna Taylor ,&nbsp;Victoria Cole ,&nbsp;Patrick Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rumination is a common feature of depression in adolescents and adults and it is implicated in the maintenance of depression symptoms. In adults, the maladaptive consequences of rumination have been attributed to the abstract processing mode that characterises this thinking style. The question of whether the same is true in adolescents remains unanswered. Here we describe two experimental studies in which adolescents were trained to think in a mode either characteristic of or inconsistent with the abstract processing style observed in depressive rumination, and the effect on social problem-solving and negative future thinking was examined. The two experiments employed a similar design. 11–14 year olds scoring in the upper and lower quartile on a measure of depression were trained to engage in an abstract or concrete processing style and then carry out a social problem-solving (Study 1) or future thinking (Study 2) task. Adolescents were worse at social problem-solving and had more negative (but not fewer positive) future thoughts when engaging in abstract processing compared to concrete processing, regardless of their current level of depressive symptoms. The finding remained when controlling for state mood. Our findings suggest there may be value in targeting abstract ruminative processing as an early treatment for depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"379 ","pages":"Pages 213-222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725003969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumination is a common feature of depression in adolescents and adults and it is implicated in the maintenance of depression symptoms. In adults, the maladaptive consequences of rumination have been attributed to the abstract processing mode that characterises this thinking style. The question of whether the same is true in adolescents remains unanswered. Here we describe two experimental studies in which adolescents were trained to think in a mode either characteristic of or inconsistent with the abstract processing style observed in depressive rumination, and the effect on social problem-solving and negative future thinking was examined. The two experiments employed a similar design. 11–14 year olds scoring in the upper and lower quartile on a measure of depression were trained to engage in an abstract or concrete processing style and then carry out a social problem-solving (Study 1) or future thinking (Study 2) task. Adolescents were worse at social problem-solving and had more negative (but not fewer positive) future thoughts when engaging in abstract processing compared to concrete processing, regardless of their current level of depressive symptoms. The finding remained when controlling for state mood. Our findings suggest there may be value in targeting abstract ruminative processing as an early treatment for depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么反刍对青少年没有帮助?两项研究考察了抽象加工的因果作用
反刍是青少年和成人抑郁症的共同特征,它与抑郁症状的维持有关。在成年人中,反刍的不良后果被归因于这种思维方式的抽象处理模式。青少年是否也有同样的情况,这个问题仍然没有答案。本文描述了两项实验研究,在这两项研究中,青少年被训练以一种与抑郁反刍中观察到的抽象加工风格特征或不一致的模式思考,并研究了这种模式对社会问题解决和消极未来思维的影响。这两个实验采用了相似的设计。11-14岁在抑郁程度上得分较高和较低四分之一的孩子被训练参与抽象或具体的处理方式,然后进行社会问题解决(研究1)或未来思考(研究2)的任务。无论他们目前的抑郁症状程度如何,在进行抽象处理时,青少年在解决社会问题方面表现较差,在进行具体处理时,他们对未来的消极(但积极)想法更多。在控制状态情绪的情况下,这一发现仍然存在。我们的研究结果表明,将抽象的反刍过程作为抑郁症的早期治疗可能有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Comparative effectiveness and safety of esketamine versus injectable racemic ketamine and oral antidepressants for major depressive disorder: A population-based target trial emulation COVID-19 anxiety's influence on obsessive compulsive symptoms among African American young adults Depression is both a risk factor for and outcome from traumatic brain injury in UK Biobank (N = 502,356) Increased serum neurodevelopmental biomarker Ndel1 activity in medicated patients with depression is associated with reduced neurite density and neuronal viability independently of intracellular Ndel1 activity Dynamic characteristics of brain networks in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder based on naturalistic paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1