A comprehensive review and future research directions of ensemble learning models for predicting building energy consumption

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115589
Zeyu Wang , Yuelan Hong , Luying Huang , Miaocui Zheng , Hongping Yuan , Ruochen Zeng
{"title":"A comprehensive review and future research directions of ensemble learning models for predicting building energy consumption","authors":"Zeyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yuelan Hong ,&nbsp;Luying Huang ,&nbsp;Miaocui Zheng ,&nbsp;Hongping Yuan ,&nbsp;Ruochen Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensemble learning has garnered increasing attention in building energy prediction over the past decade due to its exceptional predictive accuracy. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively analyze its current research status, limitations, and challenges, particularly in the context of large-scale practical applications. To address this gap, this review article systematically evaluates the application of ensemble learning models in building energy prediction. Using the PRISMA method, 82 relevant articles published between 2013 and 2024 in the Web of Science database were analyzed. The findings indicate that heterogeneous ensemble models, which integrate diverse algorithms, and homogeneous ensemble models, which utilize multiple data subsets, both hold significant potential for enhancing prediction accuracy. Specifically, heterogeneous models achieved accuracy improvements ranging from 2.59% to 80.10%, while homogeneous models demonstrated more stable improvements of 3.83% to 33.89%. Nonetheless, the integration of multiple base models increases computational complexity, resulting in higher computation times. Despite this drawback, the improved prediction accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities of ensemble models justify the additional computational cost. The review identifies key limitations, including the subjective selection of learning algorithms, the lack of systematic methods for evaluating model diversity, and insufficient exploration of combination strategies. Future research should focus on developing objective criteria for algorithm selection, advancing diversity evaluation techniques, analyzing the effects of combination methods, comparing computational efficiency, and validating the robustness and generalizability of ensemble models. This study offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to optimize ensemble learning models in building energy prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115589"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensemble learning has garnered increasing attention in building energy prediction over the past decade due to its exceptional predictive accuracy. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively analyze its current research status, limitations, and challenges, particularly in the context of large-scale practical applications. To address this gap, this review article systematically evaluates the application of ensemble learning models in building energy prediction. Using the PRISMA method, 82 relevant articles published between 2013 and 2024 in the Web of Science database were analyzed. The findings indicate that heterogeneous ensemble models, which integrate diverse algorithms, and homogeneous ensemble models, which utilize multiple data subsets, both hold significant potential for enhancing prediction accuracy. Specifically, heterogeneous models achieved accuracy improvements ranging from 2.59% to 80.10%, while homogeneous models demonstrated more stable improvements of 3.83% to 33.89%. Nonetheless, the integration of multiple base models increases computational complexity, resulting in higher computation times. Despite this drawback, the improved prediction accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities of ensemble models justify the additional computational cost. The review identifies key limitations, including the subjective selection of learning algorithms, the lack of systematic methods for evaluating model diversity, and insufficient exploration of combination strategies. Future research should focus on developing objective criteria for algorithm selection, advancing diversity evaluation techniques, analyzing the effects of combination methods, comparing computational efficiency, and validating the robustness and generalizability of ensemble models. This study offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to optimize ensemble learning models in building energy prediction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑能耗预测集成学习模型综述及未来研究方向
在过去的十年中,集成学习由于其卓越的预测准确性在建筑能源预测中获得了越来越多的关注。然而,缺乏系统的综述,全面分析其目前的研究现状、局限性和挑战,特别是在大规模实际应用的背景下。为了解决这一差距,本文系统地评估了集成学习模型在建筑能源预测中的应用。采用PRISMA方法对Web of Science数据库2013 - 2024年间发表的82篇相关文章进行分析。研究结果表明,集成了多种算法的异构集成模型和利用多个数据子集的同质集成模型都具有显著的提高预测精度的潜力。具体来说,异构模型的准确率提高幅度在2.59%到80.10%之间,而均匀模型的准确率提高幅度在3.83%到33.89%之间。然而,多个基本模型的集成增加了计算复杂性,从而导致更高的计算时间。尽管存在这个缺点,但集成模型的预测精度、鲁棒性和泛化能力的提高证明了额外的计算成本是合理的。该综述指出了主要的局限性,包括学习算法的主观选择,缺乏评估模型多样性的系统方法,以及对组合策略的探索不足。未来的研究应侧重于制定算法选择的客观标准,推进多样性评估技术,分析组合方法的效果,比较计算效率,验证集成模型的鲁棒性和泛化性。本研究为优化建筑能耗预测中的集成学习模型提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid AI and physics modelling approaches for hygrothermal behavior of bio-based building materials: challenges, limitations and perspectives A hybrid statistical-engineering approach to enhance the performance of non-routine event detection in building energy savings estimation Shifting from large-scale greening to gray-space greening: Leveraging data to quantify the microclimate and energy benefits of viaduct under-spaces Reducing urban heat stress through green roofs: A modeling-based performance analysis across green roof types and urban morphologies An integrated approach for evaluation, optimization and prediction of energy flexibility potential in the commercial building sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1