Maternal and/or direct feeding of organic acid-preserved cereal grains improves performance and digestive health of pigs from birth to slaughter

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116295
Shane Maher , Torres Sweeney , Stafford Vigors , John V. O’Doherty
{"title":"Maternal and/or direct feeding of organic acid-preserved cereal grains improves performance and digestive health of pigs from birth to slaughter","authors":"Shane Maher ,&nbsp;Torres Sweeney ,&nbsp;Stafford Vigors ,&nbsp;John V. O’Doherty","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was conducted to investigate the effects of maternal and/or direct feeding of organic acid (OA)-preserved cereal grains compared to conventionally dried grains on pig growth performance to slaughter, nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics. On day 100 of gestation, 80 sows were blocked by parity, body weight (BW), and back-fat thickness and assigned to one of two diets (dried or preserved grain) until weaning. From day 10 postpartum, their progeny were assigned to one of two diets (dried or preserved grain) resulting in four dietary treatments: (1) dried (sow)-dried (progeny), (2) dried-preserved, (3) preserved-dried, and (4) preserved-preserved (n = 20 litters per treatment). Pigs remained in these groups post-weaning (PW) and were monitored until slaughter at 142 days PW (n = 10 pens per treatment). Additionally, faecal samples from pigs in the dried-dried and preserved-preserved groups were collected for microbial analysis throughout production. Progeny from sows fed preserved grain had improved gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) between days 0–14 and 62–142 PW, with enhanced coefficients of apparent total tract digestibility (CATTD) of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), and gross energy (GE) on day 30 PW and CATTD of nitrogen (N) at slaughter compared to those from sows fed dried grain (P &lt; 0.05). Pigs directly fed preserved grain exhibited higher daily gain from weaning to slaughter, improved G:F from day 14 PW, and greater BW from day 30 PW compared to those directly fed dried grain (P &lt; 0.05). Pigs fed preserved grain showed increased CATTD of DM, OM, N, and GE on day 30 PW and at slaughter (P &lt; 0.01). Additionally, these pigs had higher carcass weight, kill-out percentage, and muscle depth at slaughter (P &lt; 0.01). Pigs in the preserved-preserved group had higher microbial diversity at weaning and on day 30 PW, with beneficial taxa such as <em>Ruminococcus</em>, <em>Propionibacterium,</em> and <em>Faecalibacterium</em> enriched at key production stages compared to those in the dried-dried group (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, maternal feeding of preserved grain improved progeny feed efficiency and CATTD of nutrients, while direct feeding enhanced pig growth performance, CATTD of nutrients, and carcass characteristics. Combined maternal and direct feeding of preserved grain also improved microbial health throughout production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 116295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125000902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was conducted to investigate the effects of maternal and/or direct feeding of organic acid (OA)-preserved cereal grains compared to conventionally dried grains on pig growth performance to slaughter, nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics. On day 100 of gestation, 80 sows were blocked by parity, body weight (BW), and back-fat thickness and assigned to one of two diets (dried or preserved grain) until weaning. From day 10 postpartum, their progeny were assigned to one of two diets (dried or preserved grain) resulting in four dietary treatments: (1) dried (sow)-dried (progeny), (2) dried-preserved, (3) preserved-dried, and (4) preserved-preserved (n = 20 litters per treatment). Pigs remained in these groups post-weaning (PW) and were monitored until slaughter at 142 days PW (n = 10 pens per treatment). Additionally, faecal samples from pigs in the dried-dried and preserved-preserved groups were collected for microbial analysis throughout production. Progeny from sows fed preserved grain had improved gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) between days 0–14 and 62–142 PW, with enhanced coefficients of apparent total tract digestibility (CATTD) of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), and gross energy (GE) on day 30 PW and CATTD of nitrogen (N) at slaughter compared to those from sows fed dried grain (P < 0.05). Pigs directly fed preserved grain exhibited higher daily gain from weaning to slaughter, improved G:F from day 14 PW, and greater BW from day 30 PW compared to those directly fed dried grain (P < 0.05). Pigs fed preserved grain showed increased CATTD of DM, OM, N, and GE on day 30 PW and at slaughter (P < 0.01). Additionally, these pigs had higher carcass weight, kill-out percentage, and muscle depth at slaughter (P < 0.01). Pigs in the preserved-preserved group had higher microbial diversity at weaning and on day 30 PW, with beneficial taxa such as Ruminococcus, Propionibacterium, and Faecalibacterium enriched at key production stages compared to those in the dried-dried group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, maternal feeding of preserved grain improved progeny feed efficiency and CATTD of nutrients, while direct feeding enhanced pig growth performance, CATTD of nutrients, and carcass characteristics. Combined maternal and direct feeding of preserved grain also improved microbial health throughout production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Maternal and/or direct feeding of organic acid-preserved cereal grains improves performance and digestive health of pigs from birth to slaughter Enhancing defense and production efficiency in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) through prophylactic dietary selenium and vitamin E fortification Effects of sucralose supplementation on rumen bacterial community, kynuronine pathway and feeding behavior in small-tailed Han sheep Effects of fermented and unfermented soybean meals on growth, body composition, and digestive enzymes in juvenile white snook (Centropomus viridis)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1