{"title":"Coupled SWMM-MOEA/D for multi-objective optimization of low impact development in urban stormwater systems","authors":"Kazem Javan , Saeed Banihashemi , Amirhossein Nazari , Abbas Roozbahani , Mariam Darestani , Hanieh Hossieni","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating challenge of unsustainable urban development worldwide has precipitated changes in land usage, contributing to increased impermeability of the urban landscape. This phenomenon exacerbates urban runoff, a critical environmental concern. In response, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, recognized for their environmental efficacy, have emerged as pivotal in mitigating urban runoff. However, transforming the hydrological dynamics of urban watersheds into a more sustainable state necessitates substantial financial commitments from relevant authorities. Consequently, strategic LID planning becomes essential to maximize effectiveness while minimizing costs. This research introduces a novel, hybrid modeling strategy that integrates the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with the Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm by Decomposition (MOEA/D) optimization algorithm. This approach aims to concurrently minimize runoff volume, peak flow rate, and implementation expenses. Focusing on a segment of Tehran Municipality’s urban stormwater system in District 11, the study evaluates four distinct LID scenarios. These scenarios encompass various configurations of Rain Barrels (RB), Bioretention Cells (BC), Green Roofs (GR), and Porous Pavements (PP). Utilizing the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for comparative analysis, the study results identify the most efficacious scenario, S2_1, including RB and BC, which achieves a 19.34% reduction in runoff volume and a 46.53 % decrease in peak flow rate, all at the implementation cost of 123,169 USD. A close second, scenario S3_1 incorporating RB and PP, demonstrates a 17 % and 46.55 % reduction in runoff volume and peak flow at an expenditure of 107,017 USD, respectively. The proposed SWMM-MOEA/D model, in conjunction with TOPSIS, presents a valuable tool for LID planning and optimization, offering decision-makers and relevant entities a pragmatic approach to address the challenges of urban runoff management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"656 ","pages":"Article 133044"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The escalating challenge of unsustainable urban development worldwide has precipitated changes in land usage, contributing to increased impermeability of the urban landscape. This phenomenon exacerbates urban runoff, a critical environmental concern. In response, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, recognized for their environmental efficacy, have emerged as pivotal in mitigating urban runoff. However, transforming the hydrological dynamics of urban watersheds into a more sustainable state necessitates substantial financial commitments from relevant authorities. Consequently, strategic LID planning becomes essential to maximize effectiveness while minimizing costs. This research introduces a novel, hybrid modeling strategy that integrates the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with the Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm by Decomposition (MOEA/D) optimization algorithm. This approach aims to concurrently minimize runoff volume, peak flow rate, and implementation expenses. Focusing on a segment of Tehran Municipality’s urban stormwater system in District 11, the study evaluates four distinct LID scenarios. These scenarios encompass various configurations of Rain Barrels (RB), Bioretention Cells (BC), Green Roofs (GR), and Porous Pavements (PP). Utilizing the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for comparative analysis, the study results identify the most efficacious scenario, S2_1, including RB and BC, which achieves a 19.34% reduction in runoff volume and a 46.53 % decrease in peak flow rate, all at the implementation cost of 123,169 USD. A close second, scenario S3_1 incorporating RB and PP, demonstrates a 17 % and 46.55 % reduction in runoff volume and peak flow at an expenditure of 107,017 USD, respectively. The proposed SWMM-MOEA/D model, in conjunction with TOPSIS, presents a valuable tool for LID planning and optimization, offering decision-makers and relevant entities a pragmatic approach to address the challenges of urban runoff management.
世界范围内不可持续的城市发展所带来的不断升级的挑战加速了土地使用的变化,导致城市景观的不渗透性增加。这种现象加剧了城市径流,这是一个关键的环境问题。因此,低影响开发(LID)技术因其环境效益而得到认可,已成为缓解城市径流的关键。然而,将城市流域的水文动态转变为更可持续的状态需要有关当局作出大量财政承诺。因此,战略性LID规划对于最大限度地提高效率,同时最大限度地降低成本至关重要。本文提出了一种将雨水管理模型(SWMM)与多目标分解进化算法(MOEA/D)优化算法相结合的新型混合建模策略。该方法旨在同时最小化径流量、峰值流量和实施费用。本研究以德黑兰11区城市雨水系统的一部分为研究对象,评估了四种不同的LID情景。这些方案包括各种配置的雨桶(RB)、生物保留细胞(BC)、绿色屋顶(GR)和多孔路面(PP)。利用TOPSIS (technology for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)方法进行对比分析,研究结果确定了最有效的方案S2_1,包括RB和BC,该方案的径流量减少19.34%,峰值流量减少46.53%,实施成本为123,169美元。紧随其后的方案S3_1(含RB和PP)显示,径流量和峰值流量分别减少17%和46.55%,成本分别为107,017美元。所提出的SWMM-MOEA/D模型与TOPSIS相结合,为LID规划和优化提供了有价值的工具,为决策者和相关实体提供了应对城市径流管理挑战的实用方法。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.