April in this issue

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1111/medu.15630
{"title":"April in this issue","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/medu.15630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This sociomaterial study on ‘fixing disconnects’ interviewed Canadian Competency-Based Medical Education implementation leads about their agency and constraints in the process of curriculum making. While curriculum design, education contexts and technologies were actors in disconnecting assessment from learning, some training programmes managed to adapt through creative workarounds for responsive teaching, tailored learning and meaningful entrustment. As such, this study offers insights and principles for making competency-based learning work for all learners and contexts.</p><p>\n <span>Ott, MC</span>, <span>Dengler, L</span>, <span>Hibbert, K</span>, <span>Ott, M</span>. <span>Fixing disconnects: exploring the emergence of principled adaptations in a competency-based curriculum</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>428</span>–<span>438</span>. doi:10.1111/medu.15475.</p><p>As medical students enter clinical practice, they often face emotionally charged end-of-life decisions that challenge their moral compass and professional identity. This study delves into the experiences of Brazilian medical students as they navigate these complex situations, revealing the profound impact of connecting with patients during end-of-life care. Key findings suggest that choosing to connect with patients rather than retreating to clinical detachment can transform students' professional identities and reinforce their commitment to compassionate care. This research underscores the need for medical educators to support students through these transformative experiences, promoting emotional resilience and patient-centred care.</p><p>\n <span>Ribeiro, DL</span>, <span>Sacardo, D</span>, <span>Drzazga, G</span>, <span>Carvalho Filho, M</span>. <span>Connect or detach: a transformative experience for medical students in end-of-life care</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>395</span>–<span>408</span>. doi:10.1111/medu.15545.</p><p>Using transformative theory as a framework, this research explores conceptual differences in the professionalism lapses of different health professional trainees and faculty to determine what helps or hinders transformation around these lapses. The context bound nature of professionalism lapses contributed to challenges in recognising or acknowledging lapses, especially when implicit, inconsistent or part of a hidden curriculum around expected social and/or communication norms. Also highlighted was the effect of power differentials on the response to professionalism lapses. To navigate these waters, clear communication of professional standards (including clinical context), space for dialogue and mindfulness of power dynamics are warranted.</p><p>\n <span>Sibbald, M</span>, <span>Sheth, U</span>, <span>Last, N</span>, <span>Keuhl, A</span>, <span>McPherson, I</span>, <span>Wojkowski, S</span>, <span>Bakker, D</span>, <span>Rowland, P</span>. <span>Professionalism lapses in health professions training: navigating the ‘yellow card’ moments for transformative learning</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>418</span>–<span>427</span>. doi:10.1111/medu.15540.</p><p>Qualitative interviews are both critically important and perennially challenging tools in health professions education research (HPER). Many researchers struggle to engage diverse participants and participants may find the questions researchers ask difficult to answer through oral questions alone. Alternative methods such as photos, videos or vignettes can work alongside oral interview questions to counter the challenges researchers face, but the HPER community has barely begun to engage with these diverse elicitation strategies. The framework provided in this article will guide researchers in identifying and selecting elicitation techniques that will improve the quality of their interview data.</p><p>\n <span>Kahlke, R</span>, <span>Maggio, LA</span>, <span>Lee, M</span>, <span>Cristancho, S</span>, <span>LaDonna, K</span>, <span>Abdallah, Z</span>, <span>Khehra, A</span>, <span>Kshatri, K</span>, <span>Horsley, T</span>, <span>Varpio, L</span>. <span>When words fail us: an integrative review of innovative elicitation techniques for qualitative interviews</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>382</span>–<span>394</span>. doi:10.1111/medu.15555.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"59 4","pages":"353"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This sociomaterial study on ‘fixing disconnects’ interviewed Canadian Competency-Based Medical Education implementation leads about their agency and constraints in the process of curriculum making. While curriculum design, education contexts and technologies were actors in disconnecting assessment from learning, some training programmes managed to adapt through creative workarounds for responsive teaching, tailored learning and meaningful entrustment. As such, this study offers insights and principles for making competency-based learning work for all learners and contexts.

Ott, MC, Dengler, L, Hibbert, K, Ott, M. Fixing disconnects: exploring the emergence of principled adaptations in a competency-based curriculum. Med Educ. 2025; 59(4): 428438. doi:10.1111/medu.15475.

As medical students enter clinical practice, they often face emotionally charged end-of-life decisions that challenge their moral compass and professional identity. This study delves into the experiences of Brazilian medical students as they navigate these complex situations, revealing the profound impact of connecting with patients during end-of-life care. Key findings suggest that choosing to connect with patients rather than retreating to clinical detachment can transform students' professional identities and reinforce their commitment to compassionate care. This research underscores the need for medical educators to support students through these transformative experiences, promoting emotional resilience and patient-centred care.

Ribeiro, DL, Sacardo, D, Drzazga, G, Carvalho Filho, M. Connect or detach: a transformative experience for medical students in end-of-life care. Med Educ. 2025; 59(4): 395408. doi:10.1111/medu.15545.

Using transformative theory as a framework, this research explores conceptual differences in the professionalism lapses of different health professional trainees and faculty to determine what helps or hinders transformation around these lapses. The context bound nature of professionalism lapses contributed to challenges in recognising or acknowledging lapses, especially when implicit, inconsistent or part of a hidden curriculum around expected social and/or communication norms. Also highlighted was the effect of power differentials on the response to professionalism lapses. To navigate these waters, clear communication of professional standards (including clinical context), space for dialogue and mindfulness of power dynamics are warranted.

Sibbald, M, Sheth, U, Last, N, Keuhl, A, McPherson, I, Wojkowski, S, Bakker, D, Rowland, P. Professionalism lapses in health professions training: navigating the ‘yellow card’ moments for transformative learning. Med Educ. 2025; 59(4): 418427. doi:10.1111/medu.15540.

Qualitative interviews are both critically important and perennially challenging tools in health professions education research (HPER). Many researchers struggle to engage diverse participants and participants may find the questions researchers ask difficult to answer through oral questions alone. Alternative methods such as photos, videos or vignettes can work alongside oral interview questions to counter the challenges researchers face, but the HPER community has barely begun to engage with these diverse elicitation strategies. The framework provided in this article will guide researchers in identifying and selecting elicitation techniques that will improve the quality of their interview data.

Kahlke, R, Maggio, LA, Lee, M, Cristancho, S, LaDonna, K, Abdallah, Z, Khehra, A, Kshatri, K, Horsley, T, Varpio, L. When words fail us: an integrative review of innovative elicitation techniques for qualitative interviews. Med Educ. 2025; 59(4): 382394. doi:10.1111/medu.15555.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Issue Information April in this issue Qualitative data, cross-language research and AI translation: Three icebergs. Developing a clinical competency committee for undergraduate medical education. Improving breaking bad news communication skills through stress arousal reappraisal and worked examples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1