Gender Differences in Protein Consumption and Body Composition: The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Dietary Choices.

IF 5.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Foods Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.3390/foods14050887
Mauro Lombardo
{"title":"Gender Differences in Protein Consumption and Body Composition: The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Dietary Choices.","authors":"Mauro Lombardo","doi":"10.3390/foods14050887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender differences in eating habits and protein consumption patterns are determined by cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural factors. Men tend to consume more meat, while women prefer plant-based proteins; however, the impact of these choices on body composition remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores gender differences in protein consumption and the influence of socioeconomic status on dietary choices, evaluating their potential association with body composition parameters, including fat mass (FM%) and fat-free mass (FFM%).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1708 Italian adults (721 males, 987 females). Food intake was assessed using a validated 7-day food diary. Participants were classified as non-consumers, low consumers, or high consumers according to the median intake of each protein source. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meat and processed meat consumption was significantly higher in men (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while women consumed more soy (<i>p</i> = 0.0087). Individuals with high meat and processed meat consumption had a higher BMI (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas soy consumption was associated with a lower BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.0027). Socioeconomic status influenced food choices: low-income men consumed more meat and processed meat compared to higher-income groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while differences in fish consumption were mainly observed in low-income groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender differences in protein consumption persist across socioeconomic levels and are related to body composition. Meat consumption is culturally linked to masculinity, whereas plant-based proteins are more commonly consumed by women. Understanding these dietary patterns can inform targeted nutritional interventions that promote balanced and sustainable diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gender differences in eating habits and protein consumption patterns are determined by cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural factors. Men tend to consume more meat, while women prefer plant-based proteins; however, the impact of these choices on body composition remains unclear.

Objectives: This study explores gender differences in protein consumption and the influence of socioeconomic status on dietary choices, evaluating their potential association with body composition parameters, including fat mass (FM%) and fat-free mass (FFM%).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1708 Italian adults (721 males, 987 females). Food intake was assessed using a validated 7-day food diary. Participants were classified as non-consumers, low consumers, or high consumers according to the median intake of each protein source. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Results: Meat and processed meat consumption was significantly higher in men (p < 0.001), while women consumed more soy (p = 0.0087). Individuals with high meat and processed meat consumption had a higher BMI (p < 0.01), whereas soy consumption was associated with a lower BMI (p = 0.0027). Socioeconomic status influenced food choices: low-income men consumed more meat and processed meat compared to higher-income groups (p < 0.01), while differences in fish consumption were mainly observed in low-income groups.

Conclusions: Gender differences in protein consumption persist across socioeconomic levels and are related to body composition. Meat consumption is culturally linked to masculinity, whereas plant-based proteins are more commonly consumed by women. Understanding these dietary patterns can inform targeted nutritional interventions that promote balanced and sustainable diets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白质消费和身体成分的性别差异:社会经济地位对饮食选择的影响。
饮食习惯和蛋白质消费模式的性别差异是由文化、社会经济和行为因素决定的。男性倾向于消费更多的肉类,而女性更喜欢植物性蛋白质;然而,这些选择对身体构成的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究探讨蛋白质摄入的性别差异以及社会经济地位对饮食选择的影响,评估其与身体组成参数(包括脂肪量(FM%)和无脂量(FFM%))的潜在关联。方法:对1708名意大利成年人(男性721人,女性987人)进行横断面研究。使用经过验证的7天饮食日记评估食物摄入量。根据每种蛋白质来源的中位数摄入量,参与者被分为非消费者、低消费者或高消费者。采用生物电阻抗分析法测定体成分。结果:肉类和加工肉制品的消费量在男性中显著增加(p < 0.001),而女性食用更多的大豆(p = 0.0087)。食用大量肉类和加工肉制品的人BMI较高(p < 0.01),而食用大豆的人BMI较低(p = 0.0027)。社会经济地位影响食物选择:与高收入群体相比,低收入男性消费更多的肉类和加工肉类(p < 0.01),而鱼类消费的差异主要见于低收入群体。结论:蛋白质消费的性别差异在社会经济水平上持续存在,并与身体成分有关。肉类消费在文化上与男子气概联系在一起,而植物性蛋白质则更常被女性消费。了解这些饮食模式可以为有针对性的营养干预提供信息,促进均衡和可持续的饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
期刊最新文献
Application of Freeze-Drying Technology in the Food Industry: A Review. Unveiling the Antihyperglycemic Potential of Arctium lappa L. (Asteraceae): Traditional Application, Phytochemistry, and Molecular Insights. Application of High Hydrostatic Pressure (Long Holding Time vs. Two Consecutive Short Cycles) for the Preservation of Lamb Burgers Enriched with Lupinus albus Flour. Effects of Ultrasonication Combined with Enzymatic Treatment on the Structure and Function of Soy Protein Isolate. Surfactin-Induced β-(1,3)-Glucan Exposure in Aspergillus niger Cell Wall: A Molecular Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1