{"title":"Agency, sex and drug education: Examining the response-ability of education responses to consumption, sex and harm.","authors":"Adrian Farrugia","doi":"10.1177/13634593251326285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how drug education professionals understand and respond to the relationship between alcohol and other drug consumption, sex and harm. While recent research examines how these issues are addressed in drug education curriculum, little is known about the perspectives of professionals involved in education design and delivery. Research suggests that agency is centrally important for understanding experiences of harmful, pleasurable or ambiguous sexual encounters in consumption settings. I analyse understandings of the relationship between agency, drug consumption, sex and harm generated during in-depth interviews with drug education professionals. Informed by Karen Barad's relational concepts of agency and response-ability, I examine the agencies that these professionals constitute as the locus of harms related to consumption and sex. Some focus on individual human agency, while others position alcohol and drugs as the primary agents of harm. Throughout the analysis I argue that both approaches offer an impoverished account of drug consumption and sex and inform education approaches that struggle to respond to other significant agencies such as gender. I also examine accounts that grapple with agencies beyond people and drugs. Overall, I argue for drug education approaches that are more response-able to the multiple agencies that together constitute experiences of drug consumption and sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251326285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251326285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines how drug education professionals understand and respond to the relationship between alcohol and other drug consumption, sex and harm. While recent research examines how these issues are addressed in drug education curriculum, little is known about the perspectives of professionals involved in education design and delivery. Research suggests that agency is centrally important for understanding experiences of harmful, pleasurable or ambiguous sexual encounters in consumption settings. I analyse understandings of the relationship between agency, drug consumption, sex and harm generated during in-depth interviews with drug education professionals. Informed by Karen Barad's relational concepts of agency and response-ability, I examine the agencies that these professionals constitute as the locus of harms related to consumption and sex. Some focus on individual human agency, while others position alcohol and drugs as the primary agents of harm. Throughout the analysis I argue that both approaches offer an impoverished account of drug consumption and sex and inform education approaches that struggle to respond to other significant agencies such as gender. I also examine accounts that grapple with agencies beyond people and drugs. Overall, I argue for drug education approaches that are more response-able to the multiple agencies that together constitute experiences of drug consumption and sex.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.