Development and evaluation of an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for managing intraoperative hypotension.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s00540-025-03476-z
Osamu Nagata, Emi Morinushi, Aya Kuroyanagi, Fumiyo Yasuma
{"title":"Development and evaluation of an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for managing intraoperative hypotension.","authors":"Osamu Nagata, Emi Morinushi, Aya Kuroyanagi, Fumiyo Yasuma","doi":"10.1007/s00540-025-03476-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for the management of intraoperative hypotension, assessing its efficacy in maintaining adequate blood pressure levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients undergoing surgery with anticipated blood pressure fluctuations were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) was measured at 2.5-min intervals using an upper arm cuff. In the automated group, phenylephrine administration was governed by an automated system that delivered bolus doses and adjusted the continuous infusion rate when mean blood pressure (MBP) dropped below 65 mmHg. In the manual group, phenylephrine administration was initiated by the attending anesthesiologist under the same MBP threshold. Propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium were administered via the automated delivery system for total intravenous anesthesia, to minimize hemodynamic variability between groups. The primary end point was the percentage of time during which MBP remained above 65 mmHg and systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg, measured from the initiation to the cessation of intravenous anesthesia and assessed using a non-inferiority test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated group adequately maintained blood pressure within the target range for 84.53% of the time, compared to 72.45% in the manual group, confirming statistical non-inferiority (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This system effectively managed intraoperative hypotension using intermittent NIBP measurements, which are more feasible in clinical practice. Despite relying on less frequent and lower-resolution blood pressure data, it demonstrated efficacy comparable to anesthesiologist-led management, indicating its potential for broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"372-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-025-03476-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for the management of intraoperative hypotension, assessing its efficacy in maintaining adequate blood pressure levels.

Methods: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with anticipated blood pressure fluctuations were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) was measured at 2.5-min intervals using an upper arm cuff. In the automated group, phenylephrine administration was governed by an automated system that delivered bolus doses and adjusted the continuous infusion rate when mean blood pressure (MBP) dropped below 65 mmHg. In the manual group, phenylephrine administration was initiated by the attending anesthesiologist under the same MBP threshold. Propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium were administered via the automated delivery system for total intravenous anesthesia, to minimize hemodynamic variability between groups. The primary end point was the percentage of time during which MBP remained above 65 mmHg and systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg, measured from the initiation to the cessation of intravenous anesthesia and assessed using a non-inferiority test.

Results: The automated group adequately maintained blood pressure within the target range for 84.53% of the time, compared to 72.45% in the manual group, confirming statistical non-inferiority (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This system effectively managed intraoperative hypotension using intermittent NIBP measurements, which are more feasible in clinical practice. Despite relying on less frequent and lower-resolution blood pressure data, it demonstrated efficacy comparable to anesthesiologist-led management, indicating its potential for broader clinical application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过下限控制控制术中低血压的自动苯肾上腺素输送系统的开发和评价。
目的:在本研究中,我们旨在开发和评估一种通过下限控制的自动化苯肾上腺素输送系统,用于术中低血压的管理,评估其在维持适当血压水平方面的功效。方法:20例预期血压波动的手术患者入组研究。患者被随机分为两组。使用上臂袖带每隔2.5分钟测量一次无创血压(NIBP)。在自动化组中,苯肾上腺素的给药由自动化系统控制,该系统在平均血压(MBP)降至65 mmHg以下时提供大剂量并调整持续输注速率。在手动组,由主治麻醉师在相同的MBP阈值下开始给药。丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和罗库溴铵通过自动给药系统进行全静脉麻醉,以尽量减少组间血流动力学的差异。主要终点是从静脉麻醉开始到停止,MBP保持在65 mmHg以上,收缩压低于140 mmHg的时间百分比,并使用非劣效性试验进行评估。结果:与手动组72.45%的时间相比,自动组84.53%的时间将血压维持在目标范围内,证实了统计学上的非劣效性(p)结论:该系统采用间歇NIBP测量有效地管理术中低血压,在临床实践中更为可行。尽管依赖于频率较低和分辨率较低的血压数据,但它显示出与麻醉师主导的管理相当的疗效,表明其具有更广泛的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Catheterization of the distal radial artery in patients in prone position. Different viewpoints on research misconduct-comment on 'Anesthesia research misconduct in Japan: understanding the status is critical to prevention' by Hirota et al. Delivery-related charges of elective induction compared with on-demand epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study. Impact of prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications with penehyclidine inhalation on long-term outcomes in high-risk patients: follow-up of a randomized trial. Comment on "Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management team on acute and chronic pain management after total knee arthroplasty".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1