Comparison of the behaviour of pro-oxidant additive containing plastic degradation in the unmanaged natural environment and in the laboratory.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241270
Fabiola Sciscione, Luba Prout, Jack W E Jeffries, Hajar J Karam, Achilleas Constantinou, Fei Peng, S M Al-Salem, Helen C Hailes, Mark Miodownik
{"title":"Comparison of the behaviour of pro-oxidant additive containing plastic degradation in the unmanaged natural environment and in the laboratory.","authors":"Fabiola Sciscione, Luba Prout, Jack W E Jeffries, Hajar J Karam, Achilleas Constantinou, Fei Peng, S M Al-Salem, Helen C Hailes, Mark Miodownik","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pro-oxidant additive containing (PAC) plastics are designed to degrade in the unmanaged natural environment through oxidation and biological processes. In 2020, the British Standard Institution published the PAS 9017:2020 standard designed to ensure that PAC plastic tested under a specific set of protocols would successfully biodegrade in the environment. In this article, we compare the outcomes of laboratory tests carried out according to PAS 9017:2020 with field tests in an open unmanaged environment in the UK over 24 months. We report that the PAC cups were intact after 24 months and did not undergo significant abiotic degradation nor biodegradation during field tests. The PAC cups did undergo rapid abiotic degradation during accelerated UV laboratory tests, however the carbonyl index never reached 1.0. The molecular weight of the PAC cups decreased throughout the field trials and during the laboratory tests but neither satisfied the requirements stated in PAS 9017:2020. Earthworm avoidance tests and earthworm reproduction tests carried out in artificial soil showed no significant adverse effects or impact on the microbial community. We conclude that PAS 9017:2020 does not predict the real-world behaviour of the PAC plastics we tested in the open unmanaged environment in the temperate climate of the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 3","pages":"241270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pro-oxidant additive containing (PAC) plastics are designed to degrade in the unmanaged natural environment through oxidation and biological processes. In 2020, the British Standard Institution published the PAS 9017:2020 standard designed to ensure that PAC plastic tested under a specific set of protocols would successfully biodegrade in the environment. In this article, we compare the outcomes of laboratory tests carried out according to PAS 9017:2020 with field tests in an open unmanaged environment in the UK over 24 months. We report that the PAC cups were intact after 24 months and did not undergo significant abiotic degradation nor biodegradation during field tests. The PAC cups did undergo rapid abiotic degradation during accelerated UV laboratory tests, however the carbonyl index never reached 1.0. The molecular weight of the PAC cups decreased throughout the field trials and during the laboratory tests but neither satisfied the requirements stated in PAS 9017:2020. Earthworm avoidance tests and earthworm reproduction tests carried out in artificial soil showed no significant adverse effects or impact on the microbial community. We conclude that PAS 9017:2020 does not predict the real-world behaviour of the PAC plastics we tested in the open unmanaged environment in the temperate climate of the UK.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含塑料降解的助氧化添加剂在无管理的自然环境和实验室中的行为比较。
含有促氧化添加剂(PAC)的塑料被设计为在无管理的自然环境中通过氧化和生物过程降解。2020年,英国标准协会发布了PAS 9017:2020标准,旨在确保在一套特定协议下测试的PAC塑料能够在环境中成功生物降解。在本文中,我们比较了根据PAS 9017:2020进行的实验室测试结果与英国开放无管理环境中超过24个月的现场测试结果。我们报告说,PAC杯在24个月后完好无损,在现场试验中没有发生明显的非生物降解或生物降解。在加速紫外线实验室测试中,PAC杯确实经历了快速的非生物降解,但羰基指数从未达到1.0。PAC杯的分子量在整个现场试验和实验室测试期间都有所下降,但都不满足PAS 9017:2020的要求。在人工土壤中进行的蚯蚓躲避试验和蚯蚓繁殖试验表明,对微生物群落没有明显的不利影响或影响。我们得出的结论是,PAS 9017:2020并不能预测我们在英国温带气候的开放式无管理环境中测试的PAC塑料的实际行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
期刊最新文献
Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs. A dynamical measure of algorithmically infused visibility. Chicks of cavity-nesting birds do not 'exercise' prior to fledging. A total evidence approach justifies taxonomic splitting of the endangered Pecos gambusia into three species. Do scarcity-related cues affect the sustained attentional performance of the poor and the rich differently?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1