The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3334
Francesca Trentini, Chiara Fante, Flavio Manganello, Marco Testa, Simone Battista
{"title":"The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Francesca Trentini, Chiara Fante, Flavio Manganello, Marco Testa, Simone Battista","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies demonstrated that digital tools can be effectively integrated into physiotherapy higher education. However, their adoption remains limited. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use among Italian lecturers and 2) explore lecturers' experiences with digital technology in higher education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a convergent mixed-method study using an online survey instrument for Italian physiotherapy lectures. We employed a 5-point Likert to evaluate perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use, with consensus defined as an agreement of ≥70% on a statement. An optional qualitative section explored lecturers' experiences with technology, which we analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June and September 2023, 118 lecturers (mean age: 45 ± 11; 69% female, n = 81) completed the survey. Participants expressed confidence in utilizing digital tools such as videoconferencing (95%), online repositories (88%), and communication apps (78%). On average, 32% reported using technologies \"often\" or \"always.\" In the qualitative section, completed by 77 participants, we generated three themes: 1) \"Technology can promote a constructive educational approach\"; 2) \"Action of technologies on students' learning process,\" with mixed results on their impact; and 3) \"Technology is not within everyone's reach,\" due to barriers to its implementation in didactics. Qualitative and quantitative findings confirmed one another, allowing for a deeper understanding of digital technologies among Italian physiotherapy lecturers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that digital tools are still underutilized among Italian physiotherapy lecturers. The main barriers include inadequate infrastructure and a lack of digital competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that digital tools can be effectively integrated into physiotherapy higher education. However, their adoption remains limited. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use among Italian lecturers and 2) explore lecturers' experiences with digital technology in higher education.

Methods: We performed a convergent mixed-method study using an online survey instrument for Italian physiotherapy lectures. We employed a 5-point Likert to evaluate perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use, with consensus defined as an agreement of ≥70% on a statement. An optional qualitative section explored lecturers' experiences with technology, which we analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

Results: Between June and September 2023, 118 lecturers (mean age: 45 ± 11; 69% female, n = 81) completed the survey. Participants expressed confidence in utilizing digital tools such as videoconferencing (95%), online repositories (88%), and communication apps (78%). On average, 32% reported using technologies "often" or "always." In the qualitative section, completed by 77 participants, we generated three themes: 1) "Technology can promote a constructive educational approach"; 2) "Action of technologies on students' learning process," with mixed results on their impact; and 3) "Technology is not within everyone's reach," due to barriers to its implementation in didactics. Qualitative and quantitative findings confirmed one another, allowing for a deeper understanding of digital technologies among Italian physiotherapy lecturers.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that digital tools are still underutilized among Italian physiotherapy lecturers. The main barriers include inadequate infrastructure and a lack of digital competencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study. Scaling new heights: a pilot study of the impact of climbing on balance, agility, and dexterity in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Comparisons of the effects of psychologically-informed and usual physiotherapy on pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study among Italian physiotherapists. Discriminative ability, responsiveness, and interpretability of smoothness index of gait in people with multiple sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1