Can Electroencephalography-Based Neurofeedback Treat Post-traumatic Stress Disorder? A Meta-analysis Study.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s10484-025-09701-5
Kana Matsuyanagi
{"title":"Can Electroencephalography-Based Neurofeedback Treat Post-traumatic Stress Disorder? A Meta-analysis Study.","authors":"Kana Matsuyanagi","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09701-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a significant clinical challenge with limited treatment options. Although electroencephalogram (EEG) neurofeedback has garnered attention as a prospective treatment modality for PTSD, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted to assess its efficacy and compare different treatment protocols. This study aims to provide a multi-variable meta-regression analysis of EEG neurofeedback's impact on PTSD symptoms, while also assessing variables that may influence treatment outcomes. A systematic review was performed to identify controlled studies exploring for the efficacy of EEG neurofeedback on PTSD. The overall effectiveness was evaluated through meta-analysis, and a multi-variable meta-regression was employed to discern factors affecting the EEG neurofeedback efficacy. EEG neurofeedback demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PTSD symptoms immediately post-intervention, with sustained effects observed at one-month and three-month follow-ups. A sub-analysis of sham-controlled studies confirmed that outcomes were not attributable to placebo effects. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding two outlying studies resolved heterogeneity entirely, and all subsequent analyses were conducted on the refined dataset. While initial analyses identified target frequency, target region, and feedback modality as significant moderators, meta-regressions controlling for publication year revealed that these effects were confounded by temporal trends in study design and methodological rigor. In contrast, variables related to treatment duration, such as session number, session length, or weeks of intervention, were not significant moderators. These findings suggest that EEG neurofeedback is robust across protocol variations and highlight the importance of methodological advancements in interpreting treatment efficacy. EEG neurofeedback emerges as a promising and robust treatment modality for PTSD, demonstrating sustained therapeutic effects across follow-up periods. Our findings confirm its efficacy beyond placebo effects and highlight the stability of outcomes across diverse neurofeedback protocols. This study underscores the importance of methodological rigor and standardization in EEG neurofeedback research and advocates for larger, well-controlled trials to refine and optimize treatment protocols. These findings reaffirm EEG neurofeedback's potential as a cost-effective and scalable intervention, while encouraging future research into alternative methodologies to enhance efficacy and expand accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09701-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a significant clinical challenge with limited treatment options. Although electroencephalogram (EEG) neurofeedback has garnered attention as a prospective treatment modality for PTSD, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted to assess its efficacy and compare different treatment protocols. This study aims to provide a multi-variable meta-regression analysis of EEG neurofeedback's impact on PTSD symptoms, while also assessing variables that may influence treatment outcomes. A systematic review was performed to identify controlled studies exploring for the efficacy of EEG neurofeedback on PTSD. The overall effectiveness was evaluated through meta-analysis, and a multi-variable meta-regression was employed to discern factors affecting the EEG neurofeedback efficacy. EEG neurofeedback demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PTSD symptoms immediately post-intervention, with sustained effects observed at one-month and three-month follow-ups. A sub-analysis of sham-controlled studies confirmed that outcomes were not attributable to placebo effects. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding two outlying studies resolved heterogeneity entirely, and all subsequent analyses were conducted on the refined dataset. While initial analyses identified target frequency, target region, and feedback modality as significant moderators, meta-regressions controlling for publication year revealed that these effects were confounded by temporal trends in study design and methodological rigor. In contrast, variables related to treatment duration, such as session number, session length, or weeks of intervention, were not significant moderators. These findings suggest that EEG neurofeedback is robust across protocol variations and highlight the importance of methodological advancements in interpreting treatment efficacy. EEG neurofeedback emerges as a promising and robust treatment modality for PTSD, demonstrating sustained therapeutic effects across follow-up periods. Our findings confirm its efficacy beyond placebo effects and highlight the stability of outcomes across diverse neurofeedback protocols. This study underscores the importance of methodological rigor and standardization in EEG neurofeedback research and advocates for larger, well-controlled trials to refine and optimize treatment protocols. These findings reaffirm EEG neurofeedback's potential as a cost-effective and scalable intervention, while encouraging future research into alternative methodologies to enhance efficacy and expand accessibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Electroencephalographic Biofeedback Therapy on Anxiety and Overall Well-being in Patients with Rectal Cancer. Can Electroencephalography-Based Neurofeedback Treat Post-traumatic Stress Disorder? A Meta-analysis Study. Conceptualizing Personality as Individualized Allostasis: Exploring a Balanced Measure of Personality for Psychotherapy/Psychophysiology Integration. Primary Appraisal is Affective not Cognitive: Exploring a Revised Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Improving Estimates of Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions: Exploring the Utility of Feedback Manipulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1