Insights on Degradation, Processing Factors, and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Pymetrozine, Spirotetramat, and Its Four Metabolites on Goji Berry: “Third Pole” Medicine and Food Homologous Crop

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343
Hongyu Chen, Wei Li, Haixia Zhu, Hua Weng, Shuo Shen
{"title":"Insights on Degradation, Processing Factors, and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Pymetrozine, Spirotetramat, and Its Four Metabolites on Goji Berry: “Third Pole” Medicine and Food Homologous Crop","authors":"Hongyu Chen, Wei Li, Haixia Zhu, Hua Weng, Shuo Shen","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and agricultural commodities are generally consumed as processed foods. How effective these processing procedures are at removing pesticide residues is not well understood. We report initial concentrations of one pesticide that is used extensively on crops of Goji berries, spirotetramat (and its four metabolites: spirotetramat-enol, spirotetramat-enol-glucoside, spirotetramat-monohydroxy, and spirotetramat-keto-hydroxy), and pymetrozine, to be 231.31, 297.42, 229.15, 252.33, 292.73, and 83.18 μg kg<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. Only 0.18–3.18% of pesticides were eliminated from produce by maceration and washing. Pesticide reduction during processing was 21.23–58.72% (traditional methods), 33.86–73.66% (by cooking samples), and 71.24–90.23% (through vinification), with corresponding processing factors (PFs), a measure of how processing technique affects pesticide residue levels, 0.111–0.771, 0.016–2.33, and 0.008–43.1. For traditional methods, in particular, the PFs of pesticides were 1.77–43.1, suggesting that considerable pesticide enrichment occurred. Combined with the field trial and PF residue data, the acute and chronic dietary risks of pesticides using these processing methods ranged 0.031–1.83 and 0.002–2.51%, respectively. This study provides basic information that can be used to evaluate the potential risks to health of exposure to pesticide residues.","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and agricultural commodities are generally consumed as processed foods. How effective these processing procedures are at removing pesticide residues is not well understood. We report initial concentrations of one pesticide that is used extensively on crops of Goji berries, spirotetramat (and its four metabolites: spirotetramat-enol, spirotetramat-enol-glucoside, spirotetramat-monohydroxy, and spirotetramat-keto-hydroxy), and pymetrozine, to be 231.31, 297.42, 229.15, 252.33, 292.73, and 83.18 μg kg–1, respectively. Only 0.18–3.18% of pesticides were eliminated from produce by maceration and washing. Pesticide reduction during processing was 21.23–58.72% (traditional methods), 33.86–73.66% (by cooking samples), and 71.24–90.23% (through vinification), with corresponding processing factors (PFs), a measure of how processing technique affects pesticide residue levels, 0.111–0.771, 0.016–2.33, and 0.008–43.1. For traditional methods, in particular, the PFs of pesticides were 1.77–43.1, suggesting that considerable pesticide enrichment occurred. Combined with the field trial and PF residue data, the acute and chronic dietary risks of pesticides using these processing methods ranged 0.031–1.83 and 0.002–2.51%, respectively. This study provides basic information that can be used to evaluate the potential risks to health of exposure to pesticide residues.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“第三极”药食同源作物枸杞上吡蚜酮、螺虫及其四种代谢物的降解、加工因素及风险评价研究
农药在农业中广泛使用,农产品一般作为加工食品消费。这些处理程序在去除农药残留方面的效果如何尚不清楚。我们报告了一种广泛用于枸杞作物的农药,螺旋体(及其四种代谢物:螺旋体-烯醇、螺旋体-烯醇-葡萄糖苷、螺旋体-单羟基和螺旋体-酮羟基)和吡蚜酮的初始浓度分别为231.31、297.42、229.15、252.33、292.73和83.18 μg kg-1。通过浸渍和洗涤,农药去除率仅为0.18-3.18%。加工过程中农药减量分别为21.23 ~ 58.72%(传统方法)、33.86 ~ 73.66%(蒸煮样品)和71.24 ~ 90.23%(酿造方法),相应的加工系数(PFs)为0.111 ~ 0.771、0.016 ~ 2.33和0.008 ~ 43.1,衡量加工技术对农药残留水平的影响。特别是在传统方法中,农药的PFs值为1.77 ~ 43.1,表明存在大量的农药富集。结合田间试验和PF残留数据,采用这些加工方法的农药急性和慢性膳食风险分别为0.031 ~ 1.83和0.002 ~ 2.51%。本研究提供了可用于评估农药残留暴露对健康潜在风险的基本信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
期刊最新文献
Microbiome and Metabolomics Reveal the Effect of Rhizosphere Microorganisms on Quizalofop-p-ethyl Resistance in Polypogon fugax. Semi-Rational Engineering of rhArg1 via Non-Conserved Residue Mutagenesis for Enhanced Efficiency and Stability. SlBTF3-OST1-CBF1 Module Maintains Chloroplast Integrity under Cold Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Antimicrobial Peptide Spampcin56-86 Controls Fusarium graminearum and Mycotoxin via Membrane Disruption and Oxidative Burst with TRI Repression: A Strategy for Wheat Protection. Biotechnological Improvement of Fiber Crops: Role of In Vitro Culture, Genetic Transformation, and Genome Editing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1