Validation of ICD codes for the identification of patients with functional seizures

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2025.03.002
Jonah Fox, Hannah E. Branstetter, Robert Havranek, Murli Mishra, Nicholas S. Mallett
{"title":"Validation of ICD codes for the identification of patients with functional seizures","authors":"Jonah Fox,&nbsp;Hannah E. Branstetter,&nbsp;Robert Havranek,&nbsp;Murli Mishra,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Mallett","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 codes for the identification of patients with functional seizures (FS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated the charts of 800 patients including 400 in an institution wide sample and 400 in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) sample. Half of the patients from each sample came from 2012–2013 and 2022–2023 since ICD-9-CM codes and ICD-10 codes were exclusively used in these respective periods. The charts of each patient were manually reviewed and evaluated for the presence of epilepsy and FS. Based on the 2013 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Nonepileptic Seizures Task Force guidelines we determined whether a patient had either presumptive (clinically established or documented) or probable/possible FS. We evaluated ICD-9-CM codes 300.11 (conversion disorder) and 780.39 (other convulsions) as well as ICD-10 codes F44.5 (conversion disorder or functional neurological disorder with seizures or convulsions) and R56.9 (unspecified convulsions). The positive predictive value (PPV) of each ICD code was calculated in the institution wide sample and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated in the EMU sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the institution wide sample, F44.5 had a PPV of 74.0 % (64.6–81.6) for presumptive FS and 80.0 % (71.1–86.7) when probable/possible FS patients were included. The code 300.11 had a PPV of 52.0 % (42.3–61.5) for presumptive FS and 59.0 % (49.2–68.1) when probable/possible FS patients were included. Codes R56.9 and 780.39 had PPVs that were equal to or less than 20 %. In the EMU sample, the code F44.5 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 67.1 % (56.3–76.3), 95.8 % (90.5–98.2), 91.7 % (81.9–96.4), and 80.7 % (73.4–86.4), respectively for presumptive FS. The code 300.11 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 30.1 % (20.8–41.4), 95.3 % (90.1–97.8), 78.6 % (60.5–89.8), and 70.4 % (63.1–76.7), respectively for presumptive FS. The codes R56.9 and 780.39 performed poorly.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>ICD codes had a mixed performance when used to identify patients with FS. ICD-10 code F44.5 appeared to perform the best overall.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131125000640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 codes for the identification of patients with functional seizures (FS).

Methods

We evaluated the charts of 800 patients including 400 in an institution wide sample and 400 in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) sample. Half of the patients from each sample came from 2012–2013 and 2022–2023 since ICD-9-CM codes and ICD-10 codes were exclusively used in these respective periods. The charts of each patient were manually reviewed and evaluated for the presence of epilepsy and FS. Based on the 2013 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Nonepileptic Seizures Task Force guidelines we determined whether a patient had either presumptive (clinically established or documented) or probable/possible FS. We evaluated ICD-9-CM codes 300.11 (conversion disorder) and 780.39 (other convulsions) as well as ICD-10 codes F44.5 (conversion disorder or functional neurological disorder with seizures or convulsions) and R56.9 (unspecified convulsions). The positive predictive value (PPV) of each ICD code was calculated in the institution wide sample and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated in the EMU sample.

Results

In the institution wide sample, F44.5 had a PPV of 74.0 % (64.6–81.6) for presumptive FS and 80.0 % (71.1–86.7) when probable/possible FS patients were included. The code 300.11 had a PPV of 52.0 % (42.3–61.5) for presumptive FS and 59.0 % (49.2–68.1) when probable/possible FS patients were included. Codes R56.9 and 780.39 had PPVs that were equal to or less than 20 %. In the EMU sample, the code F44.5 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 67.1 % (56.3–76.3), 95.8 % (90.5–98.2), 91.7 % (81.9–96.4), and 80.7 % (73.4–86.4), respectively for presumptive FS. The code 300.11 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 30.1 % (20.8–41.4), 95.3 % (90.1–97.8), 78.6 % (60.5–89.8), and 70.4 % (63.1–76.7), respectively for presumptive FS. The codes R56.9 and 780.39 performed poorly.

Significance

ICD codes had a mixed performance when used to identify patients with FS. ICD-10 code F44.5 appeared to perform the best overall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证ICD代码以识别功能性癫痫发作患者
目的评价ICD-9-CM和ICD-10编码对功能性癫痫(FS)患者识别的有效性。方法对800例患者的病历进行评估,其中400例为全机构样本,400例为癫痫监测单位样本。每个样本中有一半的患者来自2012-2013年和2022-2023年,因为ICD-9-CM代码和ICD-10代码仅在这些时间段使用。每位患者的图表都被手工审查并评估癫痫和FS的存在。根据2013年国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)非癫痫性发作特别工作组指南,我们确定患者是推定(临床建立或记录)还是可能/可能的FS。我们评估了ICD-9-CM代码300.11(转换障碍)和780.39(其他惊厥)以及ICD-10代码F44.5(转换障碍或伴有癫痫或惊厥的功能性神经障碍)和R56.9(未明确的惊厥)。在全机构样本中计算每个ICD代码的阳性预测值(PPV),在EMU样本中计算其敏感性、特异性、PPV和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果在全机构样本中,F44.5对推定FS的PPV为74.0%(64.6-81.6),对可能/可能FS患者的PPV为80.0%(71.1-86.7)。代码300.11对推定FS的PPV为52.0%(42.3-61.5),对可能/可能FS患者的PPV为59.0%(49.2-68.1)。代码R56.9和780.39的ppv等于或小于20%。在EMU样本中,代码F44.5对推定FS的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为67.1%(56.3-76.3)、95.8%(90.5-98.2)、91.7%(81.9-96.4)和80.7%(73.4-86.4)。编码300.11对推定FS的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为30.1%(20.8-41.4)、95.3%(90.1-97.8)、78.6%(60.5-89.8)和70.4%(63.1-76.7)。代码R56.9和780.39表现不佳。icd编码在识别FS患者时表现好坏参半。ICD-10编码F44.5总体上表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
期刊最新文献
Multicentre Delphi consensus-based development and validation of the Tele-ESSI-KAP scale: Assessing epilepsy competencies among school teachers Efficacy and quality of life outcomes in deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: A meta-analysis and systematic review Lateralized neural and oculomotor alterations in temporal lobe epilepsy: A combined eye-tracking and event-related potential study Age-stratified long-term outcomes of perampanel in focal seizure: A multicenter real-world study in South Korea Efficacy and tolerability of felbamate in adults with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities and drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-center evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1