Novel analogous tasks to assess material-specific memory impairments associated with temporal lobe epilepsy

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110366
Amélie Landry , Isabelle Rouleau , Véronique Desrochers , Emma Colucci , Victoria Gravel , Dang Khoa Nguyen , Olivier Boucher
{"title":"Novel analogous tasks to assess material-specific memory impairments associated with temporal lobe epilepsy","authors":"Amélie Landry ,&nbsp;Isabelle Rouleau ,&nbsp;Véronique Desrochers ,&nbsp;Emma Colucci ,&nbsp;Victoria Gravel ,&nbsp;Dang Khoa Nguyen ,&nbsp;Olivier Boucher","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Episodic memory tasks employing verbal material are generally sensitive to material-specific memory impairments in individuals with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE), whereas visuospatial memory tasks are less consistently failed by individuals with right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE). A limitation of these tasks is the possibility for the examinee to use verbalization strategies when tested with visuospatial stimuli, and visualization strategies with verbal material. In this study, we aimed to develop two new analogous computerized recognition tasks to identify material-specific memory impairments, adapted from those previously developed in our lab: one using verbal material (i.e., pseudowords), and the other visuospatial material (i.e., pictures depicting similar landscapes of mountains, trees, and lakes). Each task consists of a 3-trial learning phase and delayed recognition trials after 30 min. and two weeks. After having established normative data for adults (<em>N</em> = 124), we assessed the ability of each task to detect material-specific memory impairments in patients who have had surgery for LTLE (<em>n</em> = 16) or RTLE (<em>n</em> = 12). Both tasks have good psychometric properties. The RTLE group showed significantly poorer performance on the visuospatial than on the verbal memory test on all trials. The LTLE group showed significantly poorer performance on the verbal than on the visuospatial memory test on delayed (30-min. and 2-week) recognition trials. Memory profile on delayed recognition trials was concordant with the lateralization of epilepsy surgery in 87.5% of LTLE and in 83.3% of the RTLE group. This study provides preliminary clinical validation for our novel tasks to detect material-specific memory impairments in individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 110366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025001052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Episodic memory tasks employing verbal material are generally sensitive to material-specific memory impairments in individuals with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE), whereas visuospatial memory tasks are less consistently failed by individuals with right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE). A limitation of these tasks is the possibility for the examinee to use verbalization strategies when tested with visuospatial stimuli, and visualization strategies with verbal material. In this study, we aimed to develop two new analogous computerized recognition tasks to identify material-specific memory impairments, adapted from those previously developed in our lab: one using verbal material (i.e., pseudowords), and the other visuospatial material (i.e., pictures depicting similar landscapes of mountains, trees, and lakes). Each task consists of a 3-trial learning phase and delayed recognition trials after 30 min. and two weeks. After having established normative data for adults (N = 124), we assessed the ability of each task to detect material-specific memory impairments in patients who have had surgery for LTLE (n = 16) or RTLE (n = 12). Both tasks have good psychometric properties. The RTLE group showed significantly poorer performance on the visuospatial than on the verbal memory test on all trials. The LTLE group showed significantly poorer performance on the verbal than on the visuospatial memory test on delayed (30-min. and 2-week) recognition trials. Memory profile on delayed recognition trials was concordant with the lateralization of epilepsy surgery in 87.5% of LTLE and in 83.3% of the RTLE group. This study provides preliminary clinical validation for our novel tasks to detect material-specific memory impairments in individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的类似任务评估与颞叶癫痫相关的物质特异性记忆障碍
在左内侧颞叶癫痫(LTLE)患者中,使用言语材料的情景记忆任务通常对物质特异性记忆障碍敏感,而在右内侧颞叶癫痫(RTLE)患者中,视觉空间记忆任务失败的可能性较小。这些任务的一个限制是,考生在测试视觉空间刺激时可能使用语言化策略,而在测试口头材料时可能使用视觉化策略。在这项研究中,我们的目标是开发两个新的类似的计算机识别任务,以识别材料特定的记忆障碍,改编自我们实验室之前开发的那些:一个使用口头材料(即假词),另一个使用视觉空间材料(即描绘相似的山脉,树木和湖泊景观的图片)。每个任务包括三个学习阶段和30分钟和两周后的延迟识别试验。在建立了成人(N = 124)的规范数据后,我们评估了每项任务在接受过LTLE (N = 16)或RTLE (N = 12)手术的患者中检测物质特异性记忆障碍的能力。这两个任务都有很好的心理测量特性。RTLE组在所有测试中在视觉空间测试中的表现都明显低于口头记忆测试。在延迟30分钟的视觉空间记忆测试中,LTLE组在语言方面的表现明显不如前者。以及2周的认知试验。在延迟识别试验中,87.5%的LTLE组和83.3%的RTLE组的记忆特征与癫痫手术侧化一致。这项研究为我们的新任务提供了初步的临床验证,以检测颞叶癫痫患者的物质特异性记忆障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Burn injuries in patients with epilepsy: A narrative review Extreme ambient temperatures and seizure outcomes in children with epilepsy: insights from a survey in Turkey Adaptive and cognitive trajectories in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disabilities Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with post-brain injury seizures Bullying victimisation as a mediator in the association between childhood epilepsy and later emotional and behavioural difficulties: Evidence from the British National Child development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1