Quantitative Analysis of Pork Adulteration in Beef by Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Combined With Mathematical Models

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Quality Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1155/jfq/6363488
Jing Zhang, Yujing Li, Jingjing Liu, Yan Zhang, Yan Zhang, Hejie Li, Chunsheng Li
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of Pork Adulteration in Beef by Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Combined With Mathematical Models","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Yujing Li,&nbsp;Jingjing Liu,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Hejie Li,&nbsp;Chunsheng Li","doi":"10.1155/jfq/6363488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Adulterating pork into other meat is a global concern, and efficient methods for identifying meat species are of prime importance in quality assurance and regulation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the most widely used methodologies for porcine speciation. Thermostable proteins were used as suitable marker proteins for species identification in heat-processed or commercial meat products. However, the continuous pursuit of higher sensitivity narrowed the analytical range of quantitation (ROQ) resulting in reduced resolution. In our study, murine monoclonal antibodies (sTn-4C10 and sTn-4B1-HRP) which are specific to skeletal muscle troponin were used as capture antibodies and detection antibodies in a double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS–ELISA) to measure the percentage of pork in beef. When the optimal loading concentrations of sTn-4C10, sTn-4B1-HRP, and adulterated samples were set as 2, 0.2, and 20 μg/mL, respectively, this DAS–ELISA assay combined with the optimal mathematical model had an analytical ROQ of 5.79%–91.33% (<i>w</i>/<i>w</i>) in the absence of beef. The recovery rates ranged from 96% to 100%, and the coefficient of variation was below 4.5% within the ROQ. This work has widened the analytical ROQ and improved the detection resolution.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Quality","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfq/6363488","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Quality","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfq/6363488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adulterating pork into other meat is a global concern, and efficient methods for identifying meat species are of prime importance in quality assurance and regulation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the most widely used methodologies for porcine speciation. Thermostable proteins were used as suitable marker proteins for species identification in heat-processed or commercial meat products. However, the continuous pursuit of higher sensitivity narrowed the analytical range of quantitation (ROQ) resulting in reduced resolution. In our study, murine monoclonal antibodies (sTn-4C10 and sTn-4B1-HRP) which are specific to skeletal muscle troponin were used as capture antibodies and detection antibodies in a double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS–ELISA) to measure the percentage of pork in beef. When the optimal loading concentrations of sTn-4C10, sTn-4B1-HRP, and adulterated samples were set as 2, 0.2, and 20 μg/mL, respectively, this DAS–ELISA assay combined with the optimal mathematical model had an analytical ROQ of 5.79%–91.33% (w/w) in the absence of beef. The recovery rates ranged from 96% to 100%, and the coefficient of variation was below 4.5% within the ROQ. This work has widened the analytical ROQ and improved the detection resolution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附法结合数学模型定量分析牛肉中猪肉掺假
在其他肉类中掺假猪肉是一个全球关注的问题,识别肉类品种的有效方法对质量保证和监管至关重要。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)是猪物种形成最广泛使用的方法之一。热稳定性蛋白是热加工或商品肉制品中物种鉴定的合适标记蛋白。然而,对高灵敏度的不断追求使定量分析范围(ROQ)变窄,导致分辨率降低。本研究采用小鼠骨骼肌肌钙蛋白特异性单克隆抗体(sTn-4C10和sTn-4B1-HRP)作为捕获抗体和检测抗体,采用双抗体夹心ELISA法(DAS-ELISA)测定牛肉中猪肉的比例。当sTn-4C10、sTn-4B1-HRP和掺假样品的最佳上样浓度分别为2、0.2和20 μg/mL时,在不含牛肉的情况下,结合最优数学模型建立的DAS-ELISA法的分析ROQ为5.79% ~ 91.33% (w/w)。回收率为96% ~ 100%,在ROQ范围内变异系数小于4.5%。这项工作拓宽了分析ROQ,提高了检测分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
文献相关原料
公司名称
产品信息
索莱宝
Peroxidase (POD)
来源期刊
Journal of Food Quality
Journal of Food Quality 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Food Quality is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles related to all aspects of food quality characteristics acceptable to consumers. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, nutritionists, food producers, the public health sector, and governmental and non-governmental agencies with an interest in food quality.
期刊最新文献
Gas Permeation as the Nexus of Food Safety and Sustainability in the Packaging Industry The Effect of Nanoliposomes of Achillea millefolium Essential Oil on the Shelf Life of Fresh Beef at Refrigerated Storage Biopolymer-Based Encapsulation Approach: The Effect of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Oil Carried by Chitosan on Fish Fillet Quality Tracing the Role of Bioactive Ingredients in Encapsulation Techniques for Sustainable Foods: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Microbial Hazards and Their Risk Analysis in Six Popular Street Foods of Dhaka City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1