Inflammatory marker cut-off points and prognosis in incurable cancer: validation study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005302
Gabriella da Costa Cunha, Emanuelly Varea Maria Wiegert, Larissa Calixto-Lima, Livia Costa De Oliveira
{"title":"Inflammatory marker cut-off points and prognosis in incurable cancer: validation study.","authors":"Gabriella da Costa Cunha, Emanuelly Varea Maria Wiegert, Larissa Calixto-Lima, Livia Costa De Oliveira","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to determine and validate cut-off points for selected inflammatory markers to predict 30-day, 60-day and 90-day survival in patients with incurable cancer exclusively receiving palliative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study with patients referred to the palliative care unit of a national reference centre for cancer in Brazil. The sample (n=2098) was randomised into development (n=1049) and validation (n=1049) groups. C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were evaluated. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the optimal cut-off points. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards models and concordance statistic (C-statistic) were used to evaluate their predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cut-off points related to 30-day, 60-day and 90-day mortality were, respectively, as follows: CRP ≥6.0 mg/L, ≥4.8 mg/L and ≥4.7 mg/L; CAR ≥2.0, ≥1.7 and ≥1.5; NLR ≥6.5, ≥5.8 and ≥5.7; PLR ≥298.0, ≥286.7 and ≥281.2; LMR ≥1.9, ≥2.2 and ≥2.0; PNI ≥35.5, ≥46.8 and ≥30.5; and SII ≥2254.4, ≥1983.0 and ≥1844.1. The inflammatory markers that showed discriminatory accuracy (CRP, CAR, NLR, PLR and SII) were selected for validation. These markers demonstrated predictive ability, with good discriminatory power (C-statistic ≥0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimal cut-off points were validated for CRP, CAR, NLR, PLR and SII for use in the prognostic assessment of patients with incurable cancer exclusively receiving palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to determine and validate cut-off points for selected inflammatory markers to predict 30-day, 60-day and 90-day survival in patients with incurable cancer exclusively receiving palliative care.

Methods: Prospective cohort study with patients referred to the palliative care unit of a national reference centre for cancer in Brazil. The sample (n=2098) was randomised into development (n=1049) and validation (n=1049) groups. C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were evaluated. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the optimal cut-off points. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards models and concordance statistic (C-statistic) were used to evaluate their predictive ability.

Results: The optimal cut-off points related to 30-day, 60-day and 90-day mortality were, respectively, as follows: CRP ≥6.0 mg/L, ≥4.8 mg/L and ≥4.7 mg/L; CAR ≥2.0, ≥1.7 and ≥1.5; NLR ≥6.5, ≥5.8 and ≥5.7; PLR ≥298.0, ≥286.7 and ≥281.2; LMR ≥1.9, ≥2.2 and ≥2.0; PNI ≥35.5, ≥46.8 and ≥30.5; and SII ≥2254.4, ≥1983.0 and ≥1844.1. The inflammatory markers that showed discriminatory accuracy (CRP, CAR, NLR, PLR and SII) were selected for validation. These markers demonstrated predictive ability, with good discriminatory power (C-statistic ≥0.75).

Conclusions: Optimal cut-off points were validated for CRP, CAR, NLR, PLR and SII for use in the prognostic assessment of patients with incurable cancer exclusively receiving palliative care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不治癌症的炎症标志物截断点和预后:验证研究。
研究目的该研究旨在确定和验证选定炎症指标的临界点,以预测接受姑息治疗的不治癌症患者的 30 天、60 天和 90 天生存率:方法:前瞻性队列研究,对象为转诊至巴西国家癌症参考中心姑息治疗科的患者。样本(n=2098)被随机分为开发组(n=1049)和验证组(n=1049)。对 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、CRP/白蛋白比值(CAR)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值(LMR)、预后营养指数(PNI)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)进行了评估。采用时间依赖性接收器操作特征曲线来确定最佳截断点。采用卡普兰-梅耶曲线、考克斯比例危险模型和一致性统计(C-统计)来评估其预测能力:与 30 天、60 天和 90 天死亡率相关的最佳临界点分别为CRP≥6.0毫克/升、≥4.8毫克/升和≥4.7毫克/升;CAR≥2.0、≥1.7和≥1.5;NLR≥6.5、≥5.8和≥5.7;PLR≥298.0、≥286.7和≥281.2;LMR≥1.9、≥2.2和≥2.0;PNI≥35.5、≥46.8和≥30.5;SII≥2254.4、≥1983.0和≥1844.1。筛选出具有鉴别准确性的炎症标记物(CRP、CAR、NLR、PLR 和 SII)进行验证。这些标志物具有良好的预测能力和鉴别力(C 统计量≥0.75):结论:CRP、CAR、NLR、PLR 和 SII 的最佳临界点已通过验证,可用于对完全接受姑息治疗的不治癌症患者进行预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Book Review: Making Better Consumers… Economics for Consumers
IF 12.9 1区 管理学Journal of MarketingPub Date : 1962-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/002224296202600133
N. Borden
Making Better Consumers@@@Economics for Consumers
IF 12.9 1区 管理学Journal of MarketingPub Date : 1962-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/1249655
N. Borden, L. J. Gordon
Consumers' decision-making style as a basis for market segmentation
IF 0 Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for MarketingPub Date : 2001-10-01 DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JT.5740039
G. Walsh, T. Hennig-Thurau, Vincent Wayne-Mitchell, Klaus-Peter Wiedmann
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
'Blood transfusions in palliative medicine and symptom control in solid tumours'. Palliative care is related to less aggressive end-of-life treatment in haematology-oncology: a retrospective cohort study. Long-term opioid prescribing and healthcare encounters in metastatic cancer: observational population study. Physical activity and supportive care intervention preferences: a cross-sectional study of barriers in advanced cancer. Inflammatory marker cut-off points and prognosis in incurable cancer: validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1