Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12427-z
Joel Fossouo Tagne, Kara Burns, Teresa O'Brein, Wendy Chapman, Portia Cornell, Kit Huckvale, Ishaan Ameen, Jaclyn Bishop, Alison Buccheri, Jodie Reid, Anna Wong Shee, Marc Budge, Catherine E Huggins, Anna Peeters, Olivia Metcalf
{"title":"Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study.","authors":"Joel Fossouo Tagne, Kara Burns, Teresa O'Brein, Wendy Chapman, Portia Cornell, Kit Huckvale, Ishaan Ameen, Jaclyn Bishop, Alison Buccheri, Jodie Reid, Anna Wong Shee, Marc Budge, Catherine E Huggins, Anna Peeters, Olivia Metcalf","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12427-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to healthcare significantly influences health outcomes, and rural, regional and remote populations face greater challenges in accessing healthcare than urban populations. Digital health tools, such as remote patient monitoring (RPM), have significant potential to address these healthcare challenges, yet there is little research on the facilitators and barriers of RPM in these regions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to identify and understand the facilitators and barriers healthcare staff face implementing RPM in rural and regional Australia, with focus on challenges that arose after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with healthcare professionals from publicly funded health services in western rural and regional Victoria, Australia. An open-ended interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to identify key themes and strategies for effective RPM implementation. The analysis considered barriers and facilitators at micro, meso, and macro levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several barriers to RPM implementation were identified across different levels: (1) Micro-Level Factors, such as perceived low digital literacy and language barriers among individuals; (2) Meso-Level Factors, including disparities in IT infrastructure and device availability, limited training opportunities, and the need for enhanced governance within healthcare settings; and (3) Macro-Level Factors, encompassing evolving funding models and the reliability of service providers. Despite these challenges, participants acknowledged potential benefits such as improved technological interoperability, enhanced community engagement, and a data-driven approach to quality improvement. Importantly, a flexible, tailored RPM approach to accommodate specific rural and regional needs was deemed valuable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective RPM deployment in rural and regional areas is viewed by health professionals as crucial for bridging healthcare divides. However, if strategies developed for urban settings are not recalibrated to address rural challenges, the risk of RPM failure may escalate. Future initiatives must prioritize region-specific strategies and policy reforms aimed at ensuring equitable digital infrastructure and financial resource allocation to enhance healthcare access in rural and regional settings. This approach may ensure that RPM solutions are both adaptable and effective, tailored to the unique needs of each community.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12427-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to healthcare significantly influences health outcomes, and rural, regional and remote populations face greater challenges in accessing healthcare than urban populations. Digital health tools, such as remote patient monitoring (RPM), have significant potential to address these healthcare challenges, yet there is little research on the facilitators and barriers of RPM in these regions.

Aim: This study aims to identify and understand the facilitators and barriers healthcare staff face implementing RPM in rural and regional Australia, with focus on challenges that arose after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with healthcare professionals from publicly funded health services in western rural and regional Victoria, Australia. An open-ended interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to identify key themes and strategies for effective RPM implementation. The analysis considered barriers and facilitators at micro, meso, and macro levels.

Results: Several barriers to RPM implementation were identified across different levels: (1) Micro-Level Factors, such as perceived low digital literacy and language barriers among individuals; (2) Meso-Level Factors, including disparities in IT infrastructure and device availability, limited training opportunities, and the need for enhanced governance within healthcare settings; and (3) Macro-Level Factors, encompassing evolving funding models and the reliability of service providers. Despite these challenges, participants acknowledged potential benefits such as improved technological interoperability, enhanced community engagement, and a data-driven approach to quality improvement. Importantly, a flexible, tailored RPM approach to accommodate specific rural and regional needs was deemed valuable.

Conclusion: Effective RPM deployment in rural and regional areas is viewed by health professionals as crucial for bridging healthcare divides. However, if strategies developed for urban settings are not recalibrated to address rural challenges, the risk of RPM failure may escalate. Future initiatives must prioritize region-specific strategies and policy reforms aimed at ensuring equitable digital infrastructure and financial resource allocation to enhance healthcare access in rural and regional settings. This approach may ensure that RPM solutions are both adaptable and effective, tailored to the unique needs of each community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村和地区远程病人监护项目的挑战:一项定性研究。
背景:获得医疗保健显著影响健康结果,农村、地区和偏远人口在获得医疗保健方面面临比城市人口更大的挑战。数字健康工具,如远程患者监护(RPM),具有解决这些医疗保健挑战的巨大潜力,但在这些地区,关于远程患者监护的促进因素和障碍的研究很少。目的:本研究旨在确定和了解卫生保健人员在澳大利亚农村和地区实施RPM所面临的促进因素和障碍,重点关注COVID-19大流行爆发后出现的挑战。方法:对澳大利亚维多利亚州西部农村和地区公立卫生服务机构的卫生保健专业人员进行半结构化焦点小组调查。基于实施研究统一框架(CFIR)的开放式访谈指南用于确定有效实施RPM的关键主题和策略。该分析考虑了微观、中观和宏观层面的障碍和促进因素。结果:在不同的层面上发现了RPM实施的几个障碍:(1)微观层面的因素,如个人感知到的低数字素养和语言障碍;(2)中观因素,包括IT基础设施和设备可用性方面的差异、有限的培训机会以及医疗保健环境中加强治理的需求;(3)宏观层面因素,包括不断发展的融资模式和服务提供商的可靠性。尽管存在这些挑战,与会者承认了潜在的好处,如改进的技术互操作性、增强的社区参与和数据驱动的质量改进方法。重要的是,一个灵活的、量身定制的RPM方法被认为是有价值的,以适应具体的农村和区域需求。结论:卫生专业人员认为,农村和地区有效的RPM部署对于弥合卫生保健鸿沟至关重要。然而,如果针对城市环境制定的战略没有重新调整以应对农村的挑战,RPM失败的风险可能会升级。未来的举措必须优先考虑针对特定区域的战略和政策改革,以确保公平的数字基础设施和财政资源分配,以增加农村和区域环境中的医疗保健机会。这种方法可以确保RPM解决方案既可适应又有效,适合每个社区的独特需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Facilitators to the implementation and scale-up of a mHealth integrated care program for diabetes and hypertension in Ghana: a qualitative study of the Akoma Pa program. Hospital triage of general practice referrals: exploring the role of triage in rejected referrals. Community health workers fostering trust and engagement in a community-based intervention for depressive older adults in Peru: a qualitative study. Bridging public health emergency and pharmaceutical supply chain preparedness: a scoping review and framework synthesis. Health-oriented participatory leadership in European nursing homes: a qualitative cross-country study of support for employees and teams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1