Drivers of primary care appointment volumes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0
Tianchang Zhao, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton
{"title":"Drivers of primary care appointment volumes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Tianchang Zhao, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant reconfiguration of primary care systems internationally. For example, a large proportion of face-to-face appointments have been replaced by telephone or online consultations. As a result, the relationship between primary care appointment provision and some of its key determinants, such as workforce and demographic characteristics, are likely to have changed. Conclusions from previous studies which used only pre-pandemic data may no longer be applicable under these new configurations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether the relationships between primary care appointment rates and their determinants, including workforce composition and the age structure of registered patients, have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted longitudinal analysis on the 106 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England over two periods of 24 months (March 2018 to February 2020 and March 2021 to February 2023). We used fixed-effects regression models to relate monthly general practice appointment rates per registered patient to workforce size and composition and population age structure, and compared the results between the two periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pre-pandemic period, changes in full time equivalent (FTE) numbers of GP trainees and nurses were the only time-varying variables associated with appointment rates. In the post-lockdown period, the age profile of registered patients became a key determinant of appointment rates. A 1% increase in the proportion of registered patients over 80 years was associated with a 0.165 (38.7%) increase in appointments per patient per month. Changes in FTE numbers of qualified GPs and direct patient care staff were not found to influence the appointment rate in either period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relationships between primary care appointment rates and the workforce composition and population age structure have changed following the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of registered patients over the age of 80 years is now the most significant time-varying driver of appointment rates. General practices serving older patients may face much higher demand and have a bigger challenge providing sufficient appointments in the future compared to before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant reconfiguration of primary care systems internationally. For example, a large proportion of face-to-face appointments have been replaced by telephone or online consultations. As a result, the relationship between primary care appointment provision and some of its key determinants, such as workforce and demographic characteristics, are likely to have changed. Conclusions from previous studies which used only pre-pandemic data may no longer be applicable under these new configurations.

Methods: This study aims to investigate whether the relationships between primary care appointment rates and their determinants, including workforce composition and the age structure of registered patients, have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted longitudinal analysis on the 106 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England over two periods of 24 months (March 2018 to February 2020 and March 2021 to February 2023). We used fixed-effects regression models to relate monthly general practice appointment rates per registered patient to workforce size and composition and population age structure, and compared the results between the two periods.

Results: In the pre-pandemic period, changes in full time equivalent (FTE) numbers of GP trainees and nurses were the only time-varying variables associated with appointment rates. In the post-lockdown period, the age profile of registered patients became a key determinant of appointment rates. A 1% increase in the proportion of registered patients over 80 years was associated with a 0.165 (38.7%) increase in appointments per patient per month. Changes in FTE numbers of qualified GPs and direct patient care staff were not found to influence the appointment rate in either period.

Conclusion: The relationships between primary care appointment rates and the workforce composition and population age structure have changed following the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of registered patients over the age of 80 years is now the most significant time-varying driver of appointment rates. General practices serving older patients may face much higher demand and have a bigger challenge providing sufficient appointments in the future compared to before the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Transport time as a potential limiting factor for thrombolytic treatment of stroke in Norway. Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study. Drivers of primary care appointment volumes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study. A look into telepsychology in the Philippines: an exploratory-cross-sectional research. Process evaluation of a complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication care in Germany: a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1