Drivers of primary care appointment volumes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0
Tianchang Zhao, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton
{"title":"Drivers of primary care appointment volumes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Tianchang Zhao, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant reconfiguration of primary care systems internationally. For example, a large proportion of face-to-face appointments have been replaced by telephone or online consultations. As a result, the relationship between primary care appointment provision and some of its key determinants, such as workforce and demographic characteristics, are likely to have changed. Conclusions from previous studies which used only pre-pandemic data may no longer be applicable under these new configurations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether the relationships between primary care appointment rates and their determinants, including workforce composition and the age structure of registered patients, have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted longitudinal analysis on the 106 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England over two periods of 24 months (March 2018 to February 2020 and March 2021 to February 2023). We used fixed-effects regression models to relate monthly general practice appointment rates per registered patient to workforce size and composition and population age structure, and compared the results between the two periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pre-pandemic period, changes in full time equivalent (FTE) numbers of GP trainees and nurses were the only time-varying variables associated with appointment rates. In the post-lockdown period, the age profile of registered patients became a key determinant of appointment rates. A 1% increase in the proportion of registered patients over 80 years was associated with a 0.165 (38.7%) increase in appointments per patient per month. Changes in FTE numbers of qualified GPs and direct patient care staff were not found to influence the appointment rate in either period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relationships between primary care appointment rates and the workforce composition and population age structure have changed following the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of registered patients over the age of 80 years is now the most significant time-varying driver of appointment rates. General practices serving older patients may face much higher demand and have a bigger challenge providing sufficient appointments in the future compared to before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12488-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant reconfiguration of primary care systems internationally. For example, a large proportion of face-to-face appointments have been replaced by telephone or online consultations. As a result, the relationship between primary care appointment provision and some of its key determinants, such as workforce and demographic characteristics, are likely to have changed. Conclusions from previous studies which used only pre-pandemic data may no longer be applicable under these new configurations.

Methods: This study aims to investigate whether the relationships between primary care appointment rates and their determinants, including workforce composition and the age structure of registered patients, have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted longitudinal analysis on the 106 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England over two periods of 24 months (March 2018 to February 2020 and March 2021 to February 2023). We used fixed-effects regression models to relate monthly general practice appointment rates per registered patient to workforce size and composition and population age structure, and compared the results between the two periods.

Results: In the pre-pandemic period, changes in full time equivalent (FTE) numbers of GP trainees and nurses were the only time-varying variables associated with appointment rates. In the post-lockdown period, the age profile of registered patients became a key determinant of appointment rates. A 1% increase in the proportion of registered patients over 80 years was associated with a 0.165 (38.7%) increase in appointments per patient per month. Changes in FTE numbers of qualified GPs and direct patient care staff were not found to influence the appointment rate in either period.

Conclusion: The relationships between primary care appointment rates and the workforce composition and population age structure have changed following the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of registered patients over the age of 80 years is now the most significant time-varying driver of appointment rates. General practices serving older patients may face much higher demand and have a bigger challenge providing sufficient appointments in the future compared to before the pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行前后初级保健预约量的驱动因素:一项纵向研究。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行导致国际初级保健系统的重大重构。例如,很大一部分面对面的预约已被电话或在线咨询所取代。因此,初级保健预约提供与其一些关键决定因素之间的关系,如劳动力和人口特征,可能已经发生了变化。以往仅使用大流行前数据的研究得出的结论可能不再适用于这些新的配置。方法:本研究旨在探讨COVID-19大流行后基层医疗预约率与其决定因素(包括劳动力构成和登记患者年龄结构)之间的关系是否发生了变化。我们对英国106个临床调试组(ccg)进行了为期24个月的纵向分析(2018年3月至2020年2月和2021年3月至2023年2月)。我们使用固定效应回归模型将每个注册患者的每月全科医生预约率与劳动力规模和构成以及人口年龄结构联系起来,并比较了两个时期的结果。结果:在大流行前,全科医生培训生和护士的全职等效(FTE)人数的变化是与预约率相关的唯一时变变量。在封锁后时期,登记患者的年龄概况成为预约率的关键决定因素。80岁以上的注册患者比例每增加1%,每位患者每月就诊次数增加0.165次(38.7%)。合资格全科医生及直接病人护理人员的在职人数变化,并未影响两期的预约率。结论:新冠肺炎大流行后,基层医疗预约率与劳动力构成和人口年龄结构之间的关系发生了变化。80岁以上的注册患者比例现在是预约率最重要的时变驱动因素。与大流行之前相比,为老年患者提供服务的全科医生可能面临更高的需求,并且在未来提供足够的预约方面面临更大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Coadaptation and implementation of intrapartum clinical guidelines to save lives during childbirth: Protocol for an adapted PartoMa intervention in Eastern Ethiopia. Cervical cancer screen-and-treat services at HIV treatment sites in Nigeria: findings from the ICON-3 Practice Based Research Network. Service readiness of Public and private health facilities for roll-out of hepatitis C screening and management: a cross-sectional study. Missed nursing care from the perspectives of nurses and patients: a cross-sectional study. Navigating new pathways - healthcare personnel's experiences transitioning from traditional nursing homes to the dementia village care model in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1