Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review

IF 2.3 Q3 Dentistry Evidence-based dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1038/s41432-025-01132-9
Carolina Rodríguez-Medina, Sandra Amaya Sánchez, Adolfo Contreras, Javier Enrique Botero
{"title":"Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review","authors":"Carolina Rodríguez-Medina, Sandra Amaya Sánchez, Adolfo Contreras, Javier Enrique Botero","doi":"10.1038/s41432-025-01132-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs. Electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2021 and July 2024; MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and SciELO. Potential epidemiologic systematic reviews with meta-analysis that studied the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs were identified by two independent reviewers and filtered by title and abstract according to the selection criteria. The strength and the quality and certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guide. 561,554 potential results were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding records deemed ineligible by automated filters, 450 results were screened by title and abstract. This process led to 41 records being appraised in full-text. Of these, 17 were further excluded leaving a total of 24 systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria. 24 systematic reviews with a total of 32 NCDs were appraised and consolidated. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 systematic reviews (87.5%) demonstrated low bias (high quality), 2 had medium bias, and 1 exhibited high bias (low quality). Key issues identified included the formulation of explicit research questions, critical appraisal, data extraction, and publication bias. The association between periodontitis and NCDs was strong in 1 systematic review, moderate in 8, weak in 10 and absent in 7 systematic reviews. The strength of the association between NCDs and periodontitis was moderate in 6 systematic reviews and weak in 3 systematic reviews. The size of the reported effect (odds ratio/risk ratio/hazard ratio) was broader with increasing strength. Although data supports the association between periodontitis and some NCDs, and to a lesser extent between some NCDs and periodontitis, the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to very low. There is some data that, with varying degrees of association and low to very low certainty, provide evidence that periodontitis may be a potential risk factor for some NCDs and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"26 3","pages":"147-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-025-01132-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-025-01132-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs. Electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2021 and July 2024; MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and SciELO. Potential epidemiologic systematic reviews with meta-analysis that studied the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs were identified by two independent reviewers and filtered by title and abstract according to the selection criteria. The strength and the quality and certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guide. 561,554 potential results were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding records deemed ineligible by automated filters, 450 results were screened by title and abstract. This process led to 41 records being appraised in full-text. Of these, 17 were further excluded leaving a total of 24 systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria. 24 systematic reviews with a total of 32 NCDs were appraised and consolidated. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 systematic reviews (87.5%) demonstrated low bias (high quality), 2 had medium bias, and 1 exhibited high bias (low quality). Key issues identified included the formulation of explicit research questions, critical appraisal, data extraction, and publication bias. The association between periodontitis and NCDs was strong in 1 systematic review, moderate in 8, weak in 10 and absent in 7 systematic reviews. The strength of the association between NCDs and periodontitis was moderate in 6 systematic reviews and weak in 3 systematic reviews. The size of the reported effect (odds ratio/risk ratio/hazard ratio) was broader with increasing strength. Although data supports the association between periodontitis and some NCDs, and to a lesser extent between some NCDs and periodontitis, the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to very low. There is some data that, with varying degrees of association and low to very low certainty, provide evidence that periodontitis may be a potential risk factor for some NCDs and vice versa.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对牙周炎和非传染性疾病之间双向关联的科学证据的强度和确定性进行分级:总括性审查。
目的:牙周炎与多种非传染性疾病(ncd)之间存在着双向关系。本综述的目的是:(1)综合证据;(2)对牙周炎和非传染性疾病之间双向关联的科学证据的强度和确定性进行分级。数据来源:从2021年1月至2024年7月系统检索电子数据库;MEDLINE(通过PubMed), Embase和SciELO。资料选择和提取:研究牙周炎和非传染性疾病之间双向关联的潜在流行病学系统综述由两名独立的审稿人确定,并根据选择标准按标题和摘要进行筛选。根据推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)指南对证据的强度、质量和确定性进行评估。确定了561,554个潜在结果。在删除重复和排除自动过滤器认为不合格的记录后,450个结果按标题和摘要进行了筛选。这一过程导致41份记录被全文评估。其中,17项被进一步排除,总共有24项系统评价符合纳入标准。数据综合:对共32个非传染性疾病的24项系统评价进行了评价和整合。偏倚风险评估显示,21篇(87.5%)系统评价为低偏倚(高质量),2篇为中等偏倚,1篇为高偏倚(低质量)。确定的关键问题包括明确研究问题的制定、批判性评估、数据提取和发表偏倚。1篇系统综述认为牙周炎与非传染性疾病的相关性强,8篇为中等,10篇为弱,7篇不存在相关性。在6篇系统综述中,非传染性疾病与牙周炎之间的相关性为中等,在3篇系统综述中相关性较弱。报告效应的大小(优势比/风险比/风险比)随着强度的增加而扩大。虽然数据支持牙周炎与某些非传染性疾病之间的关联,并且在较小程度上支持某些非传染性疾病与牙周炎之间的关联,但证据的确定性被归类为低至极低。结论:有一些数据,具有不同程度的相关性和低到非常低的确定性,提供证据表明牙周炎可能是一些非传染性疾病的潜在危险因素,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
期刊最新文献
Association between atherosclerosis and tooth loss in adult patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. A dental-friendly menu? Asking different questions and involving different voices in evidence-based dentistry. How does a Truss conservative endodontic access cavity impact the degree of intra-canal disinfection and postoperative pain? From reviews to real-time: dynamic evidence in dentistry. Which retrieval technique offers the highest success rate for fractured dental implant abutment screws while preserving implant integrity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1