Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review.

Q3 Dentistry Evidence-based dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1038/s41432-025-01132-9
Carolina Rodríguez-Medina, Sandra Amaya Sánchez, Adolfo Contreras, Javier Enrique Botero
{"title":"Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review.","authors":"Carolina Rodríguez-Medina, Sandra Amaya Sánchez, Adolfo Contreras, Javier Enrique Botero","doi":"10.1038/s41432-025-01132-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2021 and July 2024; MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and SciELO.</p><p><strong>Data selection and extraction: </strong>Potential epidemiologic systematic reviews with meta-analysis that studied the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs were identified by two independent reviewers and filtered by title and abstract according to the selection criteria. The strength and the quality and certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guide. 561,554 potential results were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding records deemed ineligible by automated filters, 450 results were screened by title and abstract. This process led to 41 records being appraised in full-text. Of these, 17 were further excluded leaving a total of 24 systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>24 systematic reviews with a total of 32 NCDs were appraised and consolidated. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 systematic reviews (87.5%) demonstrated low bias (high quality), 2 had medium bias, and 1 exhibited high bias (low quality). Key issues identified included the formulation of explicit research questions, critical appraisal, data extraction, and publication bias. The association between periodontitis and NCDs was strong in 1 systematic review, moderate in 8, weak in 10 and absent in 7 systematic reviews. The strength of the association between NCDs and periodontitis was moderate in 6 systematic reviews and weak in 3 systematic reviews. The size of the reported effect (odds ratio/risk ratio/hazard ratio) was broader with increasing strength. Although data supports the association between periodontitis and some NCDs, and to a lesser extent between some NCDs and periodontitis, the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is some data that, with varying degrees of association and low to very low certainty, provide evidence that periodontitis may be a potential risk factor for some NCDs and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01132-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs.

Data sources: Electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2021 and July 2024; MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and SciELO.

Data selection and extraction: Potential epidemiologic systematic reviews with meta-analysis that studied the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs were identified by two independent reviewers and filtered by title and abstract according to the selection criteria. The strength and the quality and certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guide. 561,554 potential results were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding records deemed ineligible by automated filters, 450 results were screened by title and abstract. This process led to 41 records being appraised in full-text. Of these, 17 were further excluded leaving a total of 24 systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria.

Data synthesis: 24 systematic reviews with a total of 32 NCDs were appraised and consolidated. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 systematic reviews (87.5%) demonstrated low bias (high quality), 2 had medium bias, and 1 exhibited high bias (low quality). Key issues identified included the formulation of explicit research questions, critical appraisal, data extraction, and publication bias. The association between periodontitis and NCDs was strong in 1 systematic review, moderate in 8, weak in 10 and absent in 7 systematic reviews. The strength of the association between NCDs and periodontitis was moderate in 6 systematic reviews and weak in 3 systematic reviews. The size of the reported effect (odds ratio/risk ratio/hazard ratio) was broader with increasing strength. Although data supports the association between periodontitis and some NCDs, and to a lesser extent between some NCDs and periodontitis, the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to very low.

Conclusions: There is some data that, with varying degrees of association and low to very low certainty, provide evidence that periodontitis may be a potential risk factor for some NCDs and vice versa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
期刊最新文献
Deep convolutional neural networks for early detection of interproximal caries using bitewing radiographs: A systematic review. Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review. Iranian early childhood dental caries: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and associated risk factors. Can caries in anterior teeth of toddlers predict severe caries in posterior teeth? Osteopontin as a prognostic biomarker in head and neck cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1