CTP-defined collaterals is a better predictor of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion than multiphase CTA-defined collaterals.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/0271678X251325389
Guangchen He, Runjianya Ling, Liming Wei, Haitao Lu, Yi Gu, Yueqi Zhu
{"title":"CTP-defined collaterals is a better predictor of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion than multiphase CTA-defined collaterals.","authors":"Guangchen He, Runjianya Ling, Liming Wei, Haitao Lu, Yi Gu, Yueqi Zhu","doi":"10.1177/0271678X251325389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal neuroimaging modalities for differentiating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) from embolism related LVO remain uncertain. This study aimed to address this question by directly comparing collateral circulation using either baseline CT perfusion (CTP) or multiphase CT angiogram (mCTA) to define collaterals. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute large vessel occlusion from October 2021 to December 2023. All patients underwent CTP before endovascular therapy, and mCTA was reconstructed from CTP data. In-situ ICAS-LVO was confirmed by a neuro-interventional radiologist. Favorable collateral circulation was defined as a collateral index <0.4 on CTP or a collateral score ≥3 on mCTA. Of 377 patients, 72 (19%) had ICAS-LVO. Patients with only a collateral score ≥3 did not show significantly higher odds of ICAS-LVO (<i>P = </i>0.681). In contrast, those with a collateral index <0.4 but not favorable mCTA collateral had higher odds of ICAS-LVO (OR2.69, 95%CI [1.07-7.01], <i>P = </i>0.037). Subgroup analysis showed that a collateral grading scale ≥3 may not predict ICAS-LVO within 6 hours, whereas CTP's predictive performance remained consistently strong in both early and late windows. CTP defined favorable collaterals of collateral index <0.4 demonstrate greater predictive value for ICAS-LVO compared to mCTA, especially within an early time window.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"271678X251325389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251325389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal neuroimaging modalities for differentiating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) from embolism related LVO remain uncertain. This study aimed to address this question by directly comparing collateral circulation using either baseline CT perfusion (CTP) or multiphase CT angiogram (mCTA) to define collaterals. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute large vessel occlusion from October 2021 to December 2023. All patients underwent CTP before endovascular therapy, and mCTA was reconstructed from CTP data. In-situ ICAS-LVO was confirmed by a neuro-interventional radiologist. Favorable collateral circulation was defined as a collateral index <0.4 on CTP or a collateral score ≥3 on mCTA. Of 377 patients, 72 (19%) had ICAS-LVO. Patients with only a collateral score ≥3 did not show significantly higher odds of ICAS-LVO (P = 0.681). In contrast, those with a collateral index <0.4 but not favorable mCTA collateral had higher odds of ICAS-LVO (OR2.69, 95%CI [1.07-7.01], P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis showed that a collateral grading scale ≥3 may not predict ICAS-LVO within 6 hours, whereas CTP's predictive performance remained consistently strong in both early and late windows. CTP defined favorable collaterals of collateral index <0.4 demonstrate greater predictive value for ICAS-LVO compared to mCTA, especially within an early time window.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
期刊最新文献
Characterising the protective vasodilatory effects of hypobaric hypoxia on the neurovascular coupling response. CTP-defined collaterals is a better predictor of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion than multiphase CTA-defined collaterals. Magnetic resonance imaging indices for early Alzheimer's disease detection: Brain clearance markers. Mitochondria transfer for myelin repair. Molecular heterogeneity in human stroke - What can we learn from the peripheral blood transcriptome?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1