{"title":"Forget It: Reading with an IUD.","authors":"Lilith Todd","doi":"10.1007/s10912-024-09909-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposing the insides of the reproductive body visually and narratively has been a long project that has had positive and negative effects on a person's control over their choice to or not to have a child, as historians of medicine, reproduction, and the body have told us and as feminist health advocates have long insisted. The intrauterine device is a relatively new contraceptive technology that, once inserted, promises the user that they may prevent pregnancy while forgetting about the device. This essay examines how this \"forgetting\" method of relating to conception bumps up against historical circumstances and narrative structures that aim to expose and make legible the reproductive body. In this case, that exposure is to reveal the acute pain of the shifting political circumstances of birth control access. It ultimately proposes that forgetting, which is figured here as accepting limited knowledge and choosing not to read the reproductive body, produces its own dilemma: at once, the user is exempt from such day-to-day worries and denied certainty over fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-024-09909-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Exposing the insides of the reproductive body visually and narratively has been a long project that has had positive and negative effects on a person's control over their choice to or not to have a child, as historians of medicine, reproduction, and the body have told us and as feminist health advocates have long insisted. The intrauterine device is a relatively new contraceptive technology that, once inserted, promises the user that they may prevent pregnancy while forgetting about the device. This essay examines how this "forgetting" method of relating to conception bumps up against historical circumstances and narrative structures that aim to expose and make legible the reproductive body. In this case, that exposure is to reveal the acute pain of the shifting political circumstances of birth control access. It ultimately proposes that forgetting, which is figured here as accepting limited knowledge and choosing not to read the reproductive body, produces its own dilemma: at once, the user is exempt from such day-to-day worries and denied certainty over fertility.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.