>Documenting Baseline Efficacy of Grain Rescue Training for Emergency First Responders Through Pre- and Post-Testing, and Follow-Up Survey.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.13031/jash.16012
Yuan-Hsin Cheng, William E Field, Salah F Issa, Brian F French, Shawn G Ehlers, Edward J Sheldon
{"title":">Documenting Baseline Efficacy of Grain Rescue Training for Emergency First Responders Through Pre- and Post-Testing, and Follow-Up Survey.","authors":"Yuan-Hsin Cheng, William E Field, Salah F Issa, Brian F French, Shawn G Ehlers, Edward J Sheldon","doi":"10.13031/jash.16012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Pre- and post-tests, administered to 2,141 emergency first responder participants, showed an average improvement in test scores from 67% to 75%, highlighting the efficacy of the training. Interviews conducted within 3 years post-training revealed high participant satisfaction, with over 25% reporting adoption of key strategies discussed in the training by their fire/rescue service. Areas of concern were identified, including the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as free-flowing grain, which may put first responders at risk of secondary victimization.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Purdue University's Agricultural Safety and Health Program has provided leadership for nearly 40 years in the documentation of fatalities and injuries associated with agricultural confined spaces, especially those relating to grain storage, handling, and transport. Findings have been used to develop evidence-based resources to assist in the prevention and mitigation of these incidents, including the design of in-service training resources for emergency rescue and medical personnel responding to entrapments or engulfment in agricultural confined spaces. To enhance the efficacy and consistency of these training resources, a list of core competencies was developed with companion test questions by a panel of experts to validate the baseline understanding and knowledge gain of training participants. The test questions were pilot tested as pre- and post-tests and incorporated into a curriculum developed under a U.S. Department of Labor Susan Harwood Training Grant. The twenty-question pre- and post-tests were administered to 2,141 registered emergency first responder participants in training conducted primarily in Indiana. Participation was voluntary, providing 671 usable matched pre- and post-tests. On average, test scores improved from 67% to 75%. A question-by-question review highlighted areas of common knowledge as well as at least one topic in which the potential for confusion was increased by the instructional content. In addition, participants were interviewed within 3 years to assess the impact of the training received. Interviewees indicated a high level of satisfaction with the training, and over 25% indicated that their fire/rescue service adopted at least one of the seven key strategies discussed in the training. One key concern observed in training was the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as the nature of free-flowing grain, that may put first responders at risk of becoming secondary victims during rescue and extrication efforts. A need was identified for continued improvement of emergency first responder training through the incorporation of recent research findings on confined space rescue, greater attention to the prevention of secondary injuries, and more consistent instructor preparation in order to increase the probability of successful outcomes from incidents involving grain storage, handling, and transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"123-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.16012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: Pre- and post-tests, administered to 2,141 emergency first responder participants, showed an average improvement in test scores from 67% to 75%, highlighting the efficacy of the training. Interviews conducted within 3 years post-training revealed high participant satisfaction, with over 25% reporting adoption of key strategies discussed in the training by their fire/rescue service. Areas of concern were identified, including the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as free-flowing grain, which may put first responders at risk of secondary victimization.

Abstract: Purdue University's Agricultural Safety and Health Program has provided leadership for nearly 40 years in the documentation of fatalities and injuries associated with agricultural confined spaces, especially those relating to grain storage, handling, and transport. Findings have been used to develop evidence-based resources to assist in the prevention and mitigation of these incidents, including the design of in-service training resources for emergency rescue and medical personnel responding to entrapments or engulfment in agricultural confined spaces. To enhance the efficacy and consistency of these training resources, a list of core competencies was developed with companion test questions by a panel of experts to validate the baseline understanding and knowledge gain of training participants. The test questions were pilot tested as pre- and post-tests and incorporated into a curriculum developed under a U.S. Department of Labor Susan Harwood Training Grant. The twenty-question pre- and post-tests were administered to 2,141 registered emergency first responder participants in training conducted primarily in Indiana. Participation was voluntary, providing 671 usable matched pre- and post-tests. On average, test scores improved from 67% to 75%. A question-by-question review highlighted areas of common knowledge as well as at least one topic in which the potential for confusion was increased by the instructional content. In addition, participants were interviewed within 3 years to assess the impact of the training received. Interviewees indicated a high level of satisfaction with the training, and over 25% indicated that their fire/rescue service adopted at least one of the seven key strategies discussed in the training. One key concern observed in training was the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as the nature of free-flowing grain, that may put first responders at risk of becoming secondary victims during rescue and extrication efforts. A need was identified for continued improvement of emergency first responder training through the incorporation of recent research findings on confined space rescue, greater attention to the prevention of secondary injuries, and more consistent instructor preparation in order to increase the probability of successful outcomes from incidents involving grain storage, handling, and transport.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亮点:对 2 141 名急救人员进行的前后测试表明,测试成绩平均提高了 67% 至 75%,突出表明了培训的有效性。培训后 3 年内进行的访谈显示,学员的满意度很高,超过 25% 的学员表示他们所在的消防/救援部门采用了培训中讨论的关键策略。培训还发现了一些值得关注的问题,其中包括对某些危险缺乏了解,如自由流动的谷物,这可能会使急救人员面临二次伤害的风险。 摘要:近 40 年来,普渡大学的农业安全与健康项目在记录与农业密闭空间相关的伤亡事故方面一直处于领先地位,尤其是与谷物储存、处理和运输相关的事故。研究结果已被用于开发基于证据的资源,以协助预防和缓解这些事故,包括为应对农业密闭空间中的诱捕或吞没事故的紧急救援和医疗人员设计在职培训资源。为了提高这些培训资源的有效性和一致性,专家小组制定了一份核心能力清单,并附有测试问题,以验证培训参与者的基本理解和知识收获。测试问题作为前测和后测进行了试点测试,并纳入了根据美国劳工部苏珊-哈伍德培训拨款开发的课程中。在主要于印第安纳州举办的培训中,对 2,141 名注册的急救人员进行了 20 个问题的前后测试。参与者自愿参加,提供了 671 份可使用的匹配前后测试。平均而言,测试成绩从 67% 提高到 75%。对问题的逐一审查突出了常识领域以及至少一个因教学内容而增加了混淆可能性的题目。此外,还在 3 年内对参与者进行了访谈,以评估所接受培训的影响。受访者对培训的满意度很高,超过 25% 的受访者表示,他们所在的消防/救援部门至少采用了培训中讨论的七项关键策略中的一项。培训中发现的一个主要问题是,受访者对某些危险缺乏了解,例如自由流动谷物的性质,这可能会使急救人员在救援和解救过程中面临成为次要受害者的风险。我们发现有必要继续改进对第一反应者的应急培训,方法是纳入有关密闭空间救援的最新研究成果,更加关注预防二次伤害,以及更加连贯一致的教员准备工作,以提高在涉及谷物储存、处理和运输的事故中取得成功结果的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Worker Safety in Grain Handling: An Advisory Panel Perspective. Perspective: Closing the Regulatory Gap: Addressing Challenges for Autonomous Agricultural Equipment in California. Testing the Feasibility of Selected, Commercially Available Wearable Devices in Detecting Agricultural-Related Incidents. Artificial Intelligence-Driven All-Terrain Vehicle Crash Prediction and Prevention System. >Documenting Baseline Efficacy of Grain Rescue Training for Emergency First Responders Through Pre- and Post-Testing, and Follow-Up Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1