Individualized nutritional intervention compared with routine care for gestational diabetes prevention: a randomized controlled trial

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.006
Lulu Wang , Xipeng Wang , Rong Zhang , Wenguang Sun , Chenjie Zhang , Chen Zhang , Guoyou Qin , Jiahuan Peng , Hong Li , Jianxia Fan , Lei Qu , Liying Ma , Lei Chen , Jiaying Wu , Yanhui Hao , Huijuan Ruan , Tao Zheng , Dongling Wu , Shaojing Li , Yanyan Liu , Yanting Wu
{"title":"Individualized nutritional intervention compared with routine care for gestational diabetes prevention: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Lulu Wang ,&nbsp;Xipeng Wang ,&nbsp;Rong Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenguang Sun ,&nbsp;Chenjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Chen Zhang ,&nbsp;Guoyou Qin ,&nbsp;Jiahuan Peng ,&nbsp;Hong Li ,&nbsp;Jianxia Fan ,&nbsp;Lei Qu ,&nbsp;Liying Ma ,&nbsp;Lei Chen ,&nbsp;Jiaying Wu ,&nbsp;Yanhui Hao ,&nbsp;Huijuan Ruan ,&nbsp;Tao Zheng ,&nbsp;Dongling Wu ,&nbsp;Shaojing Li ,&nbsp;Yanyan Liu ,&nbsp;Yanting Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects millions of females and their children. Effective dietary strategies for early prevention are controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to investigate whether an individualized nutritional intervention reduced GDM incidence in high-risk females.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized trial was conducted at 3 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. We randomly assigned (1:1) pregnant females in the first trimester who were identified to be at high risk of GDM by a prediction model to either an individualized nutritional intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of 3 dietary consultations by dietitians based on Chinese dietary guidelines before the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 wk of gestation. The control group received usual care. All participants provided 3-d food records at each follow-up. The primary outcome was GDM incidence using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria. Key secondary outcomes were dietary alterations, gestational weight gain (GWG), maternal metabolic profile, perinatal and pregnancy outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 519 females were enrolled, of whom 261 were assigned to the intervention and 258 to usual care. GDM was diagnosed in 85/245 (34.7%) females in the intervention group compared with 89/244 (36.5%) in the control group [adjusted relative risk 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.15), <em>P</em> = 0.44]. More females in the intervention group had an appropriate GWG than the control group [1.38 (1.06, 1.79)] and lower levels of fasting and 2-h insulin during the OGTT (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). We observed a reduction in the rate of small for gestational age in the intervention group compared with the control group [0.11 (0.01, 0.80)] and neonatal hypoglycemia [0.14 (0.04, 0.57)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among females at risk of GDM, an individualized nutritional intervention based on Chinese dietary guidelines provided before the OGTT did not prevent GDM but helped to manage GWG appropriately and improved pregnancy outcomes.</div><div>This trial was registered on 27 October, 2019, with initial participant enrollment on 5 May, 2020 at ChiCTR as 1900026963 (<span><span>https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html?regno=1900026963</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 5","pages":"Pages 1199-1209"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916525001327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects millions of females and their children. Effective dietary strategies for early prevention are controversial.

Objectives

This study aims to investigate whether an individualized nutritional intervention reduced GDM incidence in high-risk females.

Methods

A randomized trial was conducted at 3 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. We randomly assigned (1:1) pregnant females in the first trimester who were identified to be at high risk of GDM by a prediction model to either an individualized nutritional intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of 3 dietary consultations by dietitians based on Chinese dietary guidelines before the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 wk of gestation. The control group received usual care. All participants provided 3-d food records at each follow-up. The primary outcome was GDM incidence using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria. Key secondary outcomes were dietary alterations, gestational weight gain (GWG), maternal metabolic profile, perinatal and pregnancy outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 519 females were enrolled, of whom 261 were assigned to the intervention and 258 to usual care. GDM was diagnosed in 85/245 (34.7%) females in the intervention group compared with 89/244 (36.5%) in the control group [adjusted relative risk 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.15), P = 0.44]. More females in the intervention group had an appropriate GWG than the control group [1.38 (1.06, 1.79)] and lower levels of fasting and 2-h insulin during the OGTT (P < 0.001). We observed a reduction in the rate of small for gestational age in the intervention group compared with the control group [0.11 (0.01, 0.80)] and neonatal hypoglycemia [0.14 (0.04, 0.57)].

Conclusions

Among females at risk of GDM, an individualized nutritional intervention based on Chinese dietary guidelines provided before the OGTT did not prevent GDM but helped to manage GWG appropriately and improved pregnancy outcomes.
This trial was registered on 27 October, 2019, with initial participant enrollment on 5 May, 2020 at ChiCTR as 1900026963 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html?regno=1900026963).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体化营养干预与常规护理预防妊娠糖尿病:一项随机对照试验。
背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)影响着数百万女性及其子女。早期预防的有效饮食策略存在争议。目的:探讨个体化营养干预是否能降低高危女性GDM的发病率。方法:在中国上海的三所三级医院进行随机试验。我们随机分配(1:1)通过预测模型确定为GDM高风险的妊娠早期妇女进行个体化营养干预或常规护理。干预包括在妊娠24-28周进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)之前,由营养师根据中国饮食指南进行三次饮食咨询。对照组接受常规护理。所有参与者在每次随访时提供3天的饮食记录。根据国际糖尿病和妊娠协会研究组的标准,主要结局是GDM的发生率。关键的次要结局是饮食改变、妊娠体重增加(GWG)、母体代谢谱、围产期和妊娠结局。进行意向治疗分析。结果:共纳入519名女性,其中261人被分配到干预组,258人被分配到常规护理组。干预组有85/245例(34.7%)女性被诊断为GDM,对照组为89/244例(36.5%)(校正相对危险度0.91 [95% CI: 0.73, 1.15], p=0.44]。干预组女性GWG值高于对照组(1.38 [1.06,1.79]),OGTT期间空腹和2小时胰岛素水平较低(结论:在GDM风险女性中,OGTT前提供的基于中国饮食指南的个性化营养干预并不能预防GDM,但有助于适当控制GWG并改善妊娠结局。试验注册:ChiCTR 1900026963于2019年10月27日注册,首次参与者注册于2020年5月5日,网址:https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html?regno=1900026963。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Leucine supplementation does not attenuate the decline in daily muscle protein synthesis rates or preserve leg muscle mass during leg immobilization in young or older adults: a double-blind randomized trial Health-related quality of life, compliance and sustained adherence on a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet compared with a high-carbohydrate low-fat diet in people with type 2 diabetes Changes in dietary sodium knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among Canadian adults in 2011 and 2024: a repeated cross-sectional study Blood micronutrients modified associations between blood heavy metals and cognitive decline in a nationally representative cross-sectional study Meal fatty acid metabolism is associated with long-term weight gain in females—a retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1