Individualized nutritional intervention versus routine care for gestational diabetes prevention: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.006
Lulu Wang, Xipeng Wang, Rong Zhang, Wenguang Sun, Chenjie Zhang, Chen Zhang, Guoyou Qin, Jiahuan Peng, Hong Li, Jianxia Fan, Lei Qu, Liying Ma, Lei Chen, Jiaying Wu, Yanhui Hao, Huijuan Ruan, Tao Zheng, Dongling Wu, Shaojing Li, Yanyan Liu, Man Wang, Huan Lu, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Ben W Mol, Hefeng Huang, Yanting Wu
{"title":"Individualized nutritional intervention versus routine care for gestational diabetes prevention: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lulu Wang, Xipeng Wang, Rong Zhang, Wenguang Sun, Chenjie Zhang, Chen Zhang, Guoyou Qin, Jiahuan Peng, Hong Li, Jianxia Fan, Lei Qu, Liying Ma, Lei Chen, Jiaying Wu, Yanhui Hao, Huijuan Ruan, Tao Zheng, Dongling Wu, Shaojing Li, Yanyan Liu, Man Wang, Huan Lu, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Ben W Mol, Hefeng Huang, Yanting Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects millions of females and their children. Effective dietary strategies for early prevention are controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether an individualized nutritional intervention reduced GDM incidence in high-risk females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial was conducted at three tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. We randomly assigned (1:1) pregnant women in the first trimester who were identified to be at high risk of GDM by a prediction model to either an individualized nutritional intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of three dietary consultations by dietitians based on Chinese dietary guidelines before the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 gestational weeks. The control group received usual care. All participants provided 3-day food records at each follow-up. The primary outcome was GDM incidence using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria. Key secondary outcomes were dietary alterations, gestational weight gain (GWG), maternal metabolic profile, perinatal and pregnancy outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 519 females were enrolled, of whom 261 were assigned to the intervention and 258 to usual care. GDM was diagnosed in 85/245 (34.7%) females in the intervention group compared to 89/244 (36.5%) in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0.91 [95% CI: 0.73, 1.15], p=0.44]. More females in the intervention group had an appropriate GWG than the control group (1.38 [1.06, 1.79]) and lower levels of fasting and 2-hour insulin during the OGTT (p<.001). We observed a reduction in the rate of small for gestational age in the intervention group compared with the control group (0.11 [0.01, 0.80]) and neonatal hypoglycemia (0.14 [0.04, 0.57]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among females at risk of GDM, an individualized nutritional intervention based on Chinese dietary guidelines provided before the OGTT did not prevent GDM but helped to manage GWG appropriately and improved pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR 1900026963 registered on Oct 27, 2019, with initial participant enrollment on May 5, 2020, noted at URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html?regno=1900026963.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects millions of females and their children. Effective dietary strategies for early prevention are controversial.

Objective: To investigate whether an individualized nutritional intervention reduced GDM incidence in high-risk females.

Methods: A randomized trial was conducted at three tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. We randomly assigned (1:1) pregnant women in the first trimester who were identified to be at high risk of GDM by a prediction model to either an individualized nutritional intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of three dietary consultations by dietitians based on Chinese dietary guidelines before the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 gestational weeks. The control group received usual care. All participants provided 3-day food records at each follow-up. The primary outcome was GDM incidence using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria. Key secondary outcomes were dietary alterations, gestational weight gain (GWG), maternal metabolic profile, perinatal and pregnancy outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.

Results: A total of 519 females were enrolled, of whom 261 were assigned to the intervention and 258 to usual care. GDM was diagnosed in 85/245 (34.7%) females in the intervention group compared to 89/244 (36.5%) in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0.91 [95% CI: 0.73, 1.15], p=0.44]. More females in the intervention group had an appropriate GWG than the control group (1.38 [1.06, 1.79]) and lower levels of fasting and 2-hour insulin during the OGTT (p<.001). We observed a reduction in the rate of small for gestational age in the intervention group compared with the control group (0.11 [0.01, 0.80]) and neonatal hypoglycemia (0.14 [0.04, 0.57]).

Conclusions: Among females at risk of GDM, an individualized nutritional intervention based on Chinese dietary guidelines provided before the OGTT did not prevent GDM but helped to manage GWG appropriately and improved pregnancy outcomes.

Trial registration: ChiCTR 1900026963 registered on Oct 27, 2019, with initial participant enrollment on May 5, 2020, noted at URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html?regno=1900026963.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Individualized nutritional intervention versus routine care for gestational diabetes prevention: A randomized controlled trial. Greenhouse gas emissions in relation to micronutrient intake and implications of energy intake: A comparative analysis of different modelling approaches. Survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in patients aged 65 and older with short bowel syndrome: a retrospective observational cohort study. Is it time to take a closer look at ultraprocessed foods? Both general and central obesity are associated with increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome: a large-scale prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1