Do Corollary Discharges Contain Information About the Volume of Inner Speech? An ERP Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02318
Kevin Berryman, Thomas J Whitford, Mike E Le Pelley, Bradley N Jack
{"title":"Do Corollary Discharges Contain Information About the Volume of Inner Speech? An ERP Study.","authors":"Kevin Berryman, Thomas J Whitford, Mike E Le Pelley, Bradley N Jack","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When we move our articulator organs to produce overt speech, the brain generates a corollary discharge that acts to suppress the neural and perceptual responses to our speech sounds. Recent research shows that inner speech-the silent production of words in one's mind-is accompanied by a corollary discharge that contains information about the timing and content of inner speech. The aim of the present study was to determine whether this corollary discharge contains information about the volume of inner speech. To investigate this, participants watched an animation that provided them with precise knowledge about when they should produce a \"loud\" or \"quiet\" inner sound. At the same time, they heard an audible sound that was either similar or dissimilar to the volume of the inner sound. We found that producing the inner sound attenuated the N1-an ERP signature of auditory processing-and enhanced the slow negative wave-an ERP signature of anticipation and motor preparation-compared with listening, regardless of whether the volume of the inner sound was similar or dissimilar to the audible sound. We also found that the volume of the inner sound did not differentially modulate the N1 or slow negative wave. We speculate that this might be because one of the functions of corollary discharge is to protect our auditory receptors from desensitization caused by audible sounds, and this might be redundant in the context of inner speech because inner speech does not produce an audible sound. We conclude that there might be a functional difference between the neural processes that underlie the production of inner and overt speech.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1521-1534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we move our articulator organs to produce overt speech, the brain generates a corollary discharge that acts to suppress the neural and perceptual responses to our speech sounds. Recent research shows that inner speech-the silent production of words in one's mind-is accompanied by a corollary discharge that contains information about the timing and content of inner speech. The aim of the present study was to determine whether this corollary discharge contains information about the volume of inner speech. To investigate this, participants watched an animation that provided them with precise knowledge about when they should produce a "loud" or "quiet" inner sound. At the same time, they heard an audible sound that was either similar or dissimilar to the volume of the inner sound. We found that producing the inner sound attenuated the N1-an ERP signature of auditory processing-and enhanced the slow negative wave-an ERP signature of anticipation and motor preparation-compared with listening, regardless of whether the volume of the inner sound was similar or dissimilar to the audible sound. We also found that the volume of the inner sound did not differentially modulate the N1 or slow negative wave. We speculate that this might be because one of the functions of corollary discharge is to protect our auditory receptors from desensitization caused by audible sounds, and this might be redundant in the context of inner speech because inner speech does not produce an audible sound. We conclude that there might be a functional difference between the neural processes that underlie the production of inner and overt speech.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推论放电是否包含有关内心言语量的信息?ERP研究。
当我们移动我们的发音器官来发出明显的语言时,大脑会产生一种必然的放电,这种放电会抑制我们对语音的神经和感知反应。最近的研究表明,内心的言语——一个人在脑海中无声的话语——伴随着一个必然的放电,其中包含了关于内心言语的时间和内容的信息。本研究的目的是确定这种推论放电是否包含有关内心言语量的信息。为了调查这个问题,参与者观看了一个动画,该动画为他们提供了关于何时应该发出“响亮”或“安静”内心声音的精确知识。与此同时,他们听到了一种与内心声音的音量相似或不同的声音。我们发现,与听相比,不管内声的音量与可听声音是否相似,产生内声会减弱n1 -一种听觉处理的ERP信号,并增强慢负波-一种预期和运动准备的ERP信号。我们还发现,内声的音量并没有分别对N1波或慢负波进行差分调制。我们推测,这可能是因为必然放电的功能之一是保护我们的听觉受体免受可听到的声音引起的脱敏,而这在内心语言的背景下可能是多余的,因为内心语言不产生可听到的声音。我们的结论是,在产生内在言语和外在言语的神经过程之间存在功能差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
When a Man Says He Is Pregnant: Event-related Potential Evidence for a Rational Account of Speaker-contextualized Language Comprehension. Tracking the Unconscious: Neural Evidence for the Retention of Unaware Information in Visual Working Memory. The Experience of Deciding: An Electroencephalography Study. Influence of Familiar Distal Landmarks on Goal Representation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Shared and Unique Connectivity Signatures of Reading and Language Deficits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1