Multiple classifiers inconsistency-based deep adversarial domain generalization method for cross-condition fault diagnosis in rotating systems

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2025.111017
Lei Gao , Qinhe Gao , Zhihao Liu , Hongjie Cheng , Jianyong Yao , Xiaoli Zhao , Sixiang Jia
{"title":"Multiple classifiers inconsistency-based deep adversarial domain generalization method for cross-condition fault diagnosis in rotating systems","authors":"Lei Gao ,&nbsp;Qinhe Gao ,&nbsp;Zhihao Liu ,&nbsp;Hongjie Cheng ,&nbsp;Jianyong Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Zhao ,&nbsp;Sixiang Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unknown fault operating conditions and the absence of fault data pose significant challenges for real-time fault diagnosis, as the generalization capability of models is heavily reliant on transferable knowledge from a single operating condition. To overcome these limitations, a novel deep adversarial domain generalization framework based on multiple classifiers inconsistency (DADG-MCI) is designed to improve generalized ability without the need for target domain data during training. Initially, unique features of the multiple source domains are captured through the probability output inconsistency of the multiple domain-specific classifiers. Subsequently, adversarial training facilitates finer-grained global feature alignment across multiple source domains, which ensures that the extracted deep features possess strong generalization capabilities. Most importantly, DADG-MCI introduces the multiple classifiers inconsistency to measure multi-domain distributional discrepancy based on Wasserstein distance, which captures feature distribution differences between domains through joint optimization of the multi-classifier module. Finally, two challenging rotating machinery fault datasets are used to evaluate the performance of DADG-MCI for cross-condition fault diagnosis. Compared to several state-of-the-art methods, DADG-MCI achieves the highest average diagnostic accuracies and successfully applies to unseen operating conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 111017"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025002182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unknown fault operating conditions and the absence of fault data pose significant challenges for real-time fault diagnosis, as the generalization capability of models is heavily reliant on transferable knowledge from a single operating condition. To overcome these limitations, a novel deep adversarial domain generalization framework based on multiple classifiers inconsistency (DADG-MCI) is designed to improve generalized ability without the need for target domain data during training. Initially, unique features of the multiple source domains are captured through the probability output inconsistency of the multiple domain-specific classifiers. Subsequently, adversarial training facilitates finer-grained global feature alignment across multiple source domains, which ensures that the extracted deep features possess strong generalization capabilities. Most importantly, DADG-MCI introduces the multiple classifiers inconsistency to measure multi-domain distributional discrepancy based on Wasserstein distance, which captures feature distribution differences between domains through joint optimization of the multi-classifier module. Finally, two challenging rotating machinery fault datasets are used to evaluate the performance of DADG-MCI for cross-condition fault diagnosis. Compared to several state-of-the-art methods, DADG-MCI achieves the highest average diagnostic accuracies and successfully applies to unseen operating conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Remaining useful life prediction for solid-state lithium batteries based on spatial–temporal relations and neuronal ODE-assisted KAN Reliability analysis and optimization of multi-state tree-structured systems with performance sharing mechanism Integrating causal representations with domain adaptation for fault diagnosis Multiple classifiers inconsistency-based deep adversarial domain generalization method for cross-condition fault diagnosis in rotating systems Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1