Delirium in older adults following traumatic brain injury during the acute stage: Validation of the Chinese version of the confusion assessment method

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151943
Chia-Jou Lin RN , Yun-Hsuan Lai RN, MSN , Donna Marie Fick RN, PhD , Chia-Chi Hsiao RN , Yi-Chen Chen RN , Sheng-Wen Huang MD , Hsiao-Yean Chiu RN, PhD
{"title":"Delirium in older adults following traumatic brain injury during the acute stage: Validation of the Chinese version of the confusion assessment method","authors":"Chia-Jou Lin RN ,&nbsp;Yun-Hsuan Lai RN, MSN ,&nbsp;Donna Marie Fick RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Chia-Chi Hsiao RN ,&nbsp;Yi-Chen Chen RN ,&nbsp;Sheng-Wen Huang MD ,&nbsp;Hsiao-Yean Chiu RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To translate and validate the confusion assessment method into traditional Chinese (CAM-TC) and explore the incidence of delirium following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the ward setting.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The CAM is a widely recognized tool for screening delirium, but it has not been translated into Traditional Chinese version, and it has seldom been used to assess delirium in TBI survivors in general wards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients aged 20 years or older, diagnosed with TBI, and with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9 or higher at admission were included. The <em>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision</em> (<em>DSM-5-TR</em>) criteria were employed as the gold standard. Cohen's kappa was used to calculate inter-rater reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study enrolled 100 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years and mild TBI. Post-TBI delirium was diagnosed in 10 % of the sample using <em>DSM-5-TR</em> criteria. A subset of 10 patients was selected for inter-rater reliability analysis, and a kappa value of 1.0 was obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.90, 0.98, and 0.94, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CAM-TC is a reliable tool for screening delirium following TBI in the ward setting. Our findings provide new insights into post-TBI delirium in this environment. Implementing an applicable delirium screening tool for post-TBI patients could facilitate further research on prevention and intervention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 151943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089718972500045X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To translate and validate the confusion assessment method into traditional Chinese (CAM-TC) and explore the incidence of delirium following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the ward setting.

Background

The CAM is a widely recognized tool for screening delirium, but it has not been translated into Traditional Chinese version, and it has seldom been used to assess delirium in TBI survivors in general wards.

Methods

Patients aged 20 years or older, diagnosed with TBI, and with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9 or higher at admission were included. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) criteria were employed as the gold standard. Cohen's kappa was used to calculate inter-rater reliability.

Results

Our study enrolled 100 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years and mild TBI. Post-TBI delirium was diagnosed in 10 % of the sample using DSM-5-TR criteria. A subset of 10 patients was selected for inter-rater reliability analysis, and a kappa value of 1.0 was obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.90, 0.98, and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusions

The CAM-TC is a reliable tool for screening delirium following TBI in the ward setting. Our findings provide new insights into post-TBI delirium in this environment. Implementing an applicable delirium screening tool for post-TBI patients could facilitate further research on prevention and intervention strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Severity of insomnia and stress perception as a chained mediator between perceived social support and somatic symptoms in Chinese's nurses Delirium in older adults following traumatic brain injury during the acute stage: Validation of the Chinese version of the confusion assessment method The association of depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life with the presence or absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in lung cancer patients Does confidence mirror competence? Outcomes following Stop the Bleed® training among lay community members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1