Counseling women with obstetric anal sphincter injury – Risk of recurrence and the influence of mode of second delivery on subsequent anal incontinence – A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.018
Ella-Josephine Mørch , Kathrine Perslev , Tine Wrønding , Anna Aabakke , ·Hanna Jangö
{"title":"Counseling women with obstetric anal sphincter injury – Risk of recurrence and the influence of mode of second delivery on subsequent anal incontinence – A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ella-Josephine Mørch ,&nbsp;Kathrine Perslev ,&nbsp;Tine Wrønding ,&nbsp;Anna Aabakke ,&nbsp;·Hanna Jangö","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery. Up to 50% of women with OASI will experience anal incontinence at long-term. However, it is uncertain whether an elective cesarean section (CS) in a subsequent pregnancy following OASI decreases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of recurrent OASI in a subsequent pregnancy after a first delivery with OASI. Additionally, we wanted to evaluate the impact of recurrent OASI on the risk of anal incontinence, and to determine whether the CS was protective against anal incontinence in women with a first delivery with OASI.</div><div>Literature searches were made in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, the last search was made in May 2024. Studies were screened and study quality was assessed using “SIGN – Methodology Checklist”.</div><div>Thirteen studies (including 3 020 897 women) were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis on risk of recurrent OASI. OASI in the first delivery increased the risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery fivefold compared to women without previous OASI OR 4.9 (95%CI 4.0–5.9). The overall risk of acquiring a recurrent OASI was 6.1% (95%CI 5.9%-6.2%).</div><div>Five studies (including 2 330 women) were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis assessing the effect of mode of subsequent delivery on anal incontinence. The risk of anal incontinence was non-significantly increased in women with a second vaginal delivery OR 1.1 (95%CI 0.9–1.4). Four studies (including 2 300 women) were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis on the risk of developing anal incontinence after recurrent OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI compared to women with OASI in the first delivery and a subsequent delivery without OASI OR 1.6 (95%CI 1.3–2.0).</div><div>In conclusion, we found an increased risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery for women with a previous OASI, compared to women without previous OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI. The risk of new onset or worsening of anal incontinence was not associated with mode of the second delivery. Women with previous OASI should be informed about the increased risk of recurrence and that elective CS is not necessarily protective against anal incontinence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"309 ","pages":"Pages 14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525001587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery. Up to 50% of women with OASI will experience anal incontinence at long-term. However, it is uncertain whether an elective cesarean section (CS) in a subsequent pregnancy following OASI decreases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of recurrent OASI in a subsequent pregnancy after a first delivery with OASI. Additionally, we wanted to evaluate the impact of recurrent OASI on the risk of anal incontinence, and to determine whether the CS was protective against anal incontinence in women with a first delivery with OASI.
Literature searches were made in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, the last search was made in May 2024. Studies were screened and study quality was assessed using “SIGN – Methodology Checklist”.
Thirteen studies (including 3 020 897 women) were included in the meta-analysis on risk of recurrent OASI. OASI in the first delivery increased the risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery fivefold compared to women without previous OASI OR 4.9 (95%CI 4.0–5.9). The overall risk of acquiring a recurrent OASI was 6.1% (95%CI 5.9%-6.2%).
Five studies (including 2 330 women) were included in the meta-analysis assessing the effect of mode of subsequent delivery on anal incontinence. The risk of anal incontinence was non-significantly increased in women with a second vaginal delivery OR 1.1 (95%CI 0.9–1.4). Four studies (including 2 300 women) were included in the meta-analysis on the risk of developing anal incontinence after recurrent OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI compared to women with OASI in the first delivery and a subsequent delivery without OASI OR 1.6 (95%CI 1.3–2.0).
In conclusion, we found an increased risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery for women with a previous OASI, compared to women without previous OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI. The risk of new onset or worsening of anal incontinence was not associated with mode of the second delivery. Women with previous OASI should be informed about the increased risk of recurrence and that elective CS is not necessarily protective against anal incontinence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为产科肛门括约肌损伤的妇女提供咨询--复发风险和第二次分娩方式对后续肛门失禁的影响--系统回顾和荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
SRSF9 mediates oncogenic RNA splicing of SLC37A4 via liquid–liquid phase separation to promote oral cancer progression
IF 10.7 1区 综合性期刊Journal of Advanced ResearchPub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.03.013
Qiu Peng, Lujuan Wang, Ying Long, Hao Tian, Xuemeng Xu, Zongyao Ren, Yaqian Han, Xianjie Jiang, Zhu Wu, Shiming Tan, Wenjuan Yang, Linda Oyang, Xia Luo, Jinguan Lin, Longzheng Xia, Mingjing Peng, Nayiyuan Wu, Yanyan Tang, Qianjin Liao, Yujuan Zhou
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
A role for the gynaecologist to address the impact of sexual assault European Urogynaecological Association Position Statement: Implantable Devices for Female Stress Incontinence Surgery The impact of serum homocysteine levels in women and men on pregnancy outcomes in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles: A retrospective cohort study Retracted vs non-retracted obstetrical randomized trials: Which quality criteria are most associated with retraction for untrustworthiness? Predictors of vasovagal symptoms or syncope during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1