Dynamic ultrasound-based determination of the optimal knee position for pullout fixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.029
Haruhiko Nakamura, Atsuto Hoshikawa, Kei Sato, Ryota Takei, Risa Matsumoto, Hiroshi Inui, Kazuo Saita
{"title":"Dynamic ultrasound-based determination of the optimal knee position for pullout fixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears","authors":"Haruhiko Nakamura,&nbsp;Atsuto Hoshikawa,&nbsp;Kei Sato,&nbsp;Ryota Takei,&nbsp;Risa Matsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroshi Inui,&nbsp;Kazuo Saita","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A larger medial meniscus extrusion (MME) predicts a poorer prognosis after arthroscopic pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). However, the optimal knee position in surgery for MMPRT to reduce MME is unclear. We evaluated the MME at various knee positions used for medial fixation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 20 patients who underwent MMPRT repair and performed ultrasonography preoperatively under anaesthesia, before fixation (both with or without traction), and post-fixation. MMEs were measured in positions A, B, C, and D (supine with the leg dropped from the bed with the knee flexed; valgus stress knee; figure-of-four; and supine with the injured knee flexed over the bed, respectively) at different time points and compared. Surgical fixation was performed in Position B.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The preoperative mean MMEs at positions A, B, C, and D were 1.5, 1.4, 5.8, and 3.6 mm, respectively, and MMEs at A and B were significantly smaller than those at C and D, whereas the MME at C was significantly larger than that at D. The intraoperative mean MMEs, at positions B and C, before traction, with traction, and post-fixation were 1.2 and 5.5 mm, 0.7 and 4.3 mm, and 0.9 and 2.3 mm, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>During MMPRT repair, MMEs increased in the figure-of-four position, but decreased with pullout fixation in the valgus stress knee position. Therefore, the valgus stress knee position is suitable for pullout fixation in MMPRT repair.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 275-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A larger medial meniscus extrusion (MME) predicts a poorer prognosis after arthroscopic pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). However, the optimal knee position in surgery for MMPRT to reduce MME is unclear. We evaluated the MME at various knee positions used for medial fixation.

Methods

We enrolled 20 patients who underwent MMPRT repair and performed ultrasonography preoperatively under anaesthesia, before fixation (both with or without traction), and post-fixation. MMEs were measured in positions A, B, C, and D (supine with the leg dropped from the bed with the knee flexed; valgus stress knee; figure-of-four; and supine with the injured knee flexed over the bed, respectively) at different time points and compared. Surgical fixation was performed in Position B.

Results

The preoperative mean MMEs at positions A, B, C, and D were 1.5, 1.4, 5.8, and 3.6 mm, respectively, and MMEs at A and B were significantly smaller than those at C and D, whereas the MME at C was significantly larger than that at D. The intraoperative mean MMEs, at positions B and C, before traction, with traction, and post-fixation were 1.2 and 5.5 mm, 0.7 and 4.3 mm, and 0.9 and 2.3 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

During MMPRT repair, MMEs increased in the figure-of-four position, but decreased with pullout fixation in the valgus stress knee position. Therefore, the valgus stress knee position is suitable for pullout fixation in MMPRT repair.

Level of Evidence

IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Application of machine learning in the context of reoperation, outcome and management after ACL reconstruction – A systematic review Influence of pre-operative co-morbidities on pain and function outcomes at 1 year after primary total knee arthroplasty Helix meniscus − A novel anatomical discovery Dynamic ultrasound-based determination of the optimal knee position for pullout fixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears Structural equation model of knee pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis-associated knee pain, based on functional capacity, kinesiophobia, muscle thickness, and joint position sense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1