{"title":"Dynamic ultrasound-based determination of the optimal knee position for pullout fixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears","authors":"Haruhiko Nakamura, Atsuto Hoshikawa, Kei Sato, Ryota Takei, Risa Matsumoto, Hiroshi Inui, Kazuo Saita","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A larger medial meniscus extrusion (MME) predicts a poorer prognosis after arthroscopic pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). However, the optimal knee position in surgery for MMPRT to reduce MME is unclear. We evaluated the MME at various knee positions used for medial fixation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 20 patients who underwent MMPRT repair and performed ultrasonography preoperatively under anaesthesia, before fixation (both with or without traction), and post-fixation. MMEs were measured in positions A, B, C, and D (supine with the leg dropped from the bed with the knee flexed; valgus stress knee; figure-of-four; and supine with the injured knee flexed over the bed, respectively) at different time points and compared. Surgical fixation was performed in Position B.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The preoperative mean MMEs at positions A, B, C, and D were 1.5, 1.4, 5.8, and 3.6 mm, respectively, and MMEs at A and B were significantly smaller than those at C and D, whereas the MME at C was significantly larger than that at D. The intraoperative mean MMEs, at positions B and C, before traction, with traction, and post-fixation were 1.2 and 5.5 mm, 0.7 and 4.3 mm, and 0.9 and 2.3 mm, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>During MMPRT repair, MMEs increased in the figure-of-four position, but decreased with pullout fixation in the valgus stress knee position. Therefore, the valgus stress knee position is suitable for pullout fixation in MMPRT repair.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 275-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
A larger medial meniscus extrusion (MME) predicts a poorer prognosis after arthroscopic pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). However, the optimal knee position in surgery for MMPRT to reduce MME is unclear. We evaluated the MME at various knee positions used for medial fixation.
Methods
We enrolled 20 patients who underwent MMPRT repair and performed ultrasonography preoperatively under anaesthesia, before fixation (both with or without traction), and post-fixation. MMEs were measured in positions A, B, C, and D (supine with the leg dropped from the bed with the knee flexed; valgus stress knee; figure-of-four; and supine with the injured knee flexed over the bed, respectively) at different time points and compared. Surgical fixation was performed in Position B.
Results
The preoperative mean MMEs at positions A, B, C, and D were 1.5, 1.4, 5.8, and 3.6 mm, respectively, and MMEs at A and B were significantly smaller than those at C and D, whereas the MME at C was significantly larger than that at D. The intraoperative mean MMEs, at positions B and C, before traction, with traction, and post-fixation were 1.2 and 5.5 mm, 0.7 and 4.3 mm, and 0.9 and 2.3 mm, respectively.
Conclusion
During MMPRT repair, MMEs increased in the figure-of-four position, but decreased with pullout fixation in the valgus stress knee position. Therefore, the valgus stress knee position is suitable for pullout fixation in MMPRT repair.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.