Application of machine learning in the context of reoperation, outcome and management after ACL reconstruction – A systematic review

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.032
Julius Michael Wolfgart , Ulf Krister Hofmann , Maximilian Praster , Marina Danalache , Filipo Migliorini , Martina Feierabend
{"title":"Application of machine learning in the context of reoperation, outcome and management after ACL reconstruction – A systematic review","authors":"Julius Michael Wolfgart ,&nbsp;Ulf Krister Hofmann ,&nbsp;Maximilian Praster ,&nbsp;Marina Danalache ,&nbsp;Filipo Migliorini ,&nbsp;Martina Feierabend","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Machine learning-based tools are becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice. They offer new possibilities but are also limited in their reliability and accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The present systematic review updates and discusses the existing literature regarding machine learning algorithm-based tools to predict outcome and management in patients after ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PubMed was searched for articles containing machine learning algorithms related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its outcome and management. No additional filters or time constraints were used. All eligible studies were accessed by hand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening of 115 articles, 15 were included. Six studies evaluated predictors for reoperation after ACL surgery. Four studies investigated the clinical outcome prediction after ACL reconstruction including prediction of secondary meniscus tear and secondary knee osteoarthritis. Single topics addressed in patients with ACL reconstruction were costs, opioid use, the need for a femoral nerve block, short term complications, hospital admission, and reduction of the burden to complete the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score questionnaire. Predictive power was very heterogeneous, depending on the specific research question and parameters included.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>New machine-learning tools offer interesting insights into variables affecting the target outcome and general management of patients with ACL reconstruction. While present machine-learning based prediction models seem to outperform previous existing benchmark regression models, their predictive ability often is still too low to base individual decision making on them. With the rapid progress observed over the last few years, it is conceivable that this might change, however, in the foreseeable future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 301-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Machine learning-based tools are becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice. They offer new possibilities but are also limited in their reliability and accuracy.

Objectives

The present systematic review updates and discusses the existing literature regarding machine learning algorithm-based tools to predict outcome and management in patients after ACL reconstruction.

Method

PubMed was searched for articles containing machine learning algorithms related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its outcome and management. No additional filters or time constraints were used. All eligible studies were accessed by hand.

Results

After screening of 115 articles, 15 were included. Six studies evaluated predictors for reoperation after ACL surgery. Four studies investigated the clinical outcome prediction after ACL reconstruction including prediction of secondary meniscus tear and secondary knee osteoarthritis. Single topics addressed in patients with ACL reconstruction were costs, opioid use, the need for a femoral nerve block, short term complications, hospital admission, and reduction of the burden to complete the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score questionnaire. Predictive power was very heterogeneous, depending on the specific research question and parameters included.

Conclusion

New machine-learning tools offer interesting insights into variables affecting the target outcome and general management of patients with ACL reconstruction. While present machine-learning based prediction models seem to outperform previous existing benchmark regression models, their predictive ability often is still too low to base individual decision making on them. With the rapid progress observed over the last few years, it is conceivable that this might change, however, in the foreseeable future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在ACL重建后再手术、结果和管理方面的应用-系统综述
基于机器学习的工具在临床实践中越来越受欢迎。它们提供了新的可能性,但在可靠性和准确性方面也受到限制。本系统综述更新并讨论了基于机器学习算法的工具来预测ACL重建患者的预后和管理的现有文献。方法检索pubmed中包含与前交叉韧带重建及其预后和处理相关的机器学习算法的文章。没有使用额外的过滤器或时间限制。所有符合条件的研究都是手工访问的。结果筛选115篇文献,纳入15篇。6项研究评估了前交叉韧带手术后再手术的预测因素。四项研究探讨了ACL重建后的临床预后预测,包括继发性半月板撕裂和继发性膝关节骨关节炎的预测。在ACL重建患者中讨论的单一主题是成本、阿片类药物的使用、股神经阻滞的需要、短期并发症、住院和减轻完成膝关节骨性关节炎和结局评分问卷的负担。根据具体的研究问题和所包含的参数,预测能力是非常不同的。结论新的机器学习工具为影响ACL重建患者目标结果和一般管理的变量提供了有趣的见解。虽然目前基于机器学习的预测模型似乎优于先前现有的基准回归模型,但它们的预测能力往往仍然太低,无法基于它们做出个人决策。然而,随着过去几年观察到的迅速进展,可以想象,在可预见的将来,这种情况可能会改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between knee and hindfoot coronal alignment in community-dwelling Japanese adults Obesity is associated with higher rates of revision following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee osteoarthritis classification using Optimized Granger Causality Inspired Graph Neural Network with Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations Sex matters: central sensitization and opioid use after total knee arthroplasty Fragility of randomized controlled trials comparing cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1