What incentives motivate smallholder farmers to reduce deforestation? Evidence from Nigeria's rainforest region

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100833
Chizoba Obianuju Oranu , Charles Jumbe , Innocent Pangapanga-Phiri , Nnaemeka Chukwuone
{"title":"What incentives motivate smallholder farmers to reduce deforestation? Evidence from Nigeria's rainforest region","authors":"Chizoba Obianuju Oranu ,&nbsp;Charles Jumbe ,&nbsp;Innocent Pangapanga-Phiri ,&nbsp;Nnaemeka Chukwuone","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deforestation has persistently undermined forests' critical role in providing environmental services and livelihood support. In developing countries like Nigeria, small-scale agriculture significantly drives deforestation. This study analyzes farmers' preferences for incentives to reduce deforestation and its influencing factors using data from 634 smallholder farmers in Cross Rivers State, located in Nigeria's rainforest region. The Conditional Mixed Process (CMP) was used to analyze farmers’ preference for financial incentives, while the multinomial probit model was used to analyze farmers’ preference for non-financial incentives and their influencing factors. The results suggest that farmers have differential preferences for incentives, with 38 percent and 42 percent having a preference for financial and non-financial incentives, respectively. The farmers' choice of non-financial incentives includes providing farm processing facilities, farm inputs, employment opportunities for youths and entrepreneurship training programs. Interestingly, 20 percent of the farmers were unwilling to accept any incentives but would rather continue clearing new forest areas. Furthermore, the findings suggest that farmers' socioeconomic and institutional factors significantly shape their choice of incentives. We argue that providing homogenous incentives for farmers may not necessarily address agricultural driven deforestation. Hence, incentive policies should account for the diversity in smallholder farmers’ preferences for sustainable deforestation reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation has persistently undermined forests' critical role in providing environmental services and livelihood support. In developing countries like Nigeria, small-scale agriculture significantly drives deforestation. This study analyzes farmers' preferences for incentives to reduce deforestation and its influencing factors using data from 634 smallholder farmers in Cross Rivers State, located in Nigeria's rainforest region. The Conditional Mixed Process (CMP) was used to analyze farmers’ preference for financial incentives, while the multinomial probit model was used to analyze farmers’ preference for non-financial incentives and their influencing factors. The results suggest that farmers have differential preferences for incentives, with 38 percent and 42 percent having a preference for financial and non-financial incentives, respectively. The farmers' choice of non-financial incentives includes providing farm processing facilities, farm inputs, employment opportunities for youths and entrepreneurship training programs. Interestingly, 20 percent of the farmers were unwilling to accept any incentives but would rather continue clearing new forest areas. Furthermore, the findings suggest that farmers' socioeconomic and institutional factors significantly shape their choice of incentives. We argue that providing homogenous incentives for farmers may not necessarily address agricultural driven deforestation. Hence, incentive policies should account for the diversity in smallholder farmers’ preferences for sustainable deforestation reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么激励措施促使小农减少森林砍伐?来自尼日利亚雨林地区的证据
森林砍伐持续破坏了森林在提供环境服务和生计支持方面的关键作用。在尼日利亚等发展中国家,小规模农业极大地推动了森林砍伐。本研究利用来自尼日利亚热带雨林地区克罗斯河州634名小农的数据,分析了农民对减少森林砍伐的激励措施的偏好及其影响因素。采用条件混合过程(CMP)分析农民对财政激励的偏好,采用多项probit模型分析农民对非财政激励的偏好及其影响因素。结果表明,农民对激励措施的偏好存在差异,分别有38%和42%的农民对财政和非财政激励措施有偏好。农民选择的非财政激励措施包括提供农场加工设施、农场投入、青年就业机会和创业培训项目。有趣的是,20%的农民不愿意接受任何激励措施,而是宁愿继续砍伐新的森林。此外,研究结果表明,农民的社会经济和制度因素显著影响了他们对激励措施的选择。我们认为,为农民提供同质激励不一定能解决农业驱动的森林砍伐问题。因此,激励政策应考虑到小农对可持续减少森林砍伐的不同偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tree shade mitigates stress and enhances chickpea productivity: Insights from an Emblica officinalis-based agroforestry system in semi-arid shallow Basaltic Deccan Plateau, India The vacuum system increases maple sap yield without extending the sugar season How does biodiversity monitoring impact those who conduct it? Reported outcomes and perspectives of a field team in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia Mixed plantations of Alnus formosana and Pinus massoniana improve ecosystem multifunctionality than monoculture plantations Integrated climate governance framework for forest fire management: A hypothetical application in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1