Editorial: Biotropica Announces a New Paper Category: Synthesis

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Biotropica Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1111/btp.70020
Jennifer S. Powers, Francis Q. Brearley, Jayashree Ratnam, Eleanor M. Slade
{"title":"Editorial: Biotropica Announces a New Paper Category: Synthesis","authors":"Jennifer S. Powers,&nbsp;Francis Q. Brearley,&nbsp;Jayashree Ratnam,&nbsp;Eleanor M. Slade","doi":"10.1111/btp.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What does it take to tackle big questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation that do not have quick answers? Several important tools have emerged in recent years including literature synthesis and meta-analysis (Halpern et al. <span>2023</span>; Lortie <span>2014</span>), complemented by distributed network experiments (Powers et al. <span>2009</span>; Roslin et al. <span>2017</span>). Synthesis often consists of meta-analyses and data integration, wherein researchers compile and analyze data from multiple sources in the literature. Often, these studies integrate information from multiple spatial sources and yield inferences at continental or global scales. The success of this approach is underscored by the creation of centers for ecological synthesis, such as the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in the United States or the Synthesis Centre for Biodiversity Sciences in Germany (sDiv). In parallel, other research groups have developed distributed ecological networks of experiments and/or observations, for example, NutNet or DarkDivNet (Borer et al. <span>2014</span>; Pärtel et al. <span>2025</span>). In these projects, researchers focus on different locations, but they all implement standardized methods to yield geographically comparative data. These approaches have undoubtedly contributed to our understanding of ecological patterns and processes at broad spatial scales, and yet they are not the only method of synthesis. The nature of tropical ecological research often means that some researchers and research groups return to the same study location year after year, building programs of investigation over decades that may integrate the role of fluctuating environmental conditions in their study system. This approach chips away at big questions one paper at a time and yields major results when synthesized (e.g., Melin et al. <span>2020</span>).</p><p>Meta-analyses or literature reviews typically begin with database searches, such as Google Scholar or Web of Science, and discourage “excessive” self-citation, as the objective is to derive generalizable patterns across many published studies. While global syntheses have provided broad ecological insights, this may have cost us the types of ecological insights that come from “slow ecology” focused on a deeper understanding of a single study system at one location (Billick and Price <span>2010</span>). Such studies, with the deep glimpses they provide into the natural history of an ecosystem, are often the source of novel observations and mechanistic understanding in ecology. They are also critical for conservation and management that require local action. We contend that we lack a platform that encourages groups of investigators to synthesize and integrate their findings from a concerted and coordinated program of study conducted in a single place over decades, that is, papers where the goal is to trace the arc of a research program over many years through “self-citation”. To fill this gap, Biotropica is creating a new paper category called “Synthesis”. The aim is not for authors to present a typical “Review Article” or meta-analysis. The new Biotropica Synthesis papers will be distinguished by being deep in time and site-specific, celebrating the insights that emerge from local, place-based ecology and showing a profound understanding of the site's natural history over a concerted period of time.</p><p>How will Synthesis papers work? Synthesis papers will follow the same format as “Reviews”, that is, 8000 word limit (excluding references). As the emphasis is on understanding the insights from a research group's work, extensive self-citations are acceptable and, indeed, expected. However, in contrast to Biotropica's Review paper category, Synthesis papers will be solicited by invitation, referral, or self-referral. The authors of all Synthesis papers are requested to send a brief inquiry email before submission to the Editorial Office that details: the location of the research, the topics or ideas addressed by the research program, the number of years of work that will be synthesized (i.e., we expect 10 years at least), a list of the major publications that will be discussed and a list of potential co-authors that would ideally include graduate students, postdoctoral research associates, and research assistants. If locally based field assistants have made substantial contributions to the work presented in the Synthesis, we strongly recommend authors consider whether their contributions merit co-authorship (see Ramírez-Castaneda et al. <span>2022</span>). Last, the inquiry should include a couple of sentences on how synthesizing this research program will provide new insights that will be of interest to tropical ecologists, that is, Biotropica readers. The Biotropica Editorial Office will then provide feedback and encourage or discourage a full submission that will be subjected to our standard peer review processes (i.e., submission does not guarantee acceptance). As Synthesis represents a new paper category for Biotropica, we do not yet have a collection of examples to use as guidelines. However, we point potential Synthesis authors to an excellent review paper that exemplifies the goals of this new paper category entitled “Primate life history, social dynamics, ecology, and conservation: Contributions from long-term research in Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica” by Melin et al. (<span>2020</span>). We look forward to receiving your contributions and hope that this new paper category spurs integration and reflection, and also serves to identify future research directions—all of which are necessary to make progress toward answering the big questions in ecology and conservation.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does it take to tackle big questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation that do not have quick answers? Several important tools have emerged in recent years including literature synthesis and meta-analysis (Halpern et al. 2023; Lortie 2014), complemented by distributed network experiments (Powers et al. 2009; Roslin et al. 2017). Synthesis often consists of meta-analyses and data integration, wherein researchers compile and analyze data from multiple sources in the literature. Often, these studies integrate information from multiple spatial sources and yield inferences at continental or global scales. The success of this approach is underscored by the creation of centers for ecological synthesis, such as the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in the United States or the Synthesis Centre for Biodiversity Sciences in Germany (sDiv). In parallel, other research groups have developed distributed ecological networks of experiments and/or observations, for example, NutNet or DarkDivNet (Borer et al. 2014; Pärtel et al. 2025). In these projects, researchers focus on different locations, but they all implement standardized methods to yield geographically comparative data. These approaches have undoubtedly contributed to our understanding of ecological patterns and processes at broad spatial scales, and yet they are not the only method of synthesis. The nature of tropical ecological research often means that some researchers and research groups return to the same study location year after year, building programs of investigation over decades that may integrate the role of fluctuating environmental conditions in their study system. This approach chips away at big questions one paper at a time and yields major results when synthesized (e.g., Melin et al. 2020).

Meta-analyses or literature reviews typically begin with database searches, such as Google Scholar or Web of Science, and discourage “excessive” self-citation, as the objective is to derive generalizable patterns across many published studies. While global syntheses have provided broad ecological insights, this may have cost us the types of ecological insights that come from “slow ecology” focused on a deeper understanding of a single study system at one location (Billick and Price 2010). Such studies, with the deep glimpses they provide into the natural history of an ecosystem, are often the source of novel observations and mechanistic understanding in ecology. They are also critical for conservation and management that require local action. We contend that we lack a platform that encourages groups of investigators to synthesize and integrate their findings from a concerted and coordinated program of study conducted in a single place over decades, that is, papers where the goal is to trace the arc of a research program over many years through “self-citation”. To fill this gap, Biotropica is creating a new paper category called “Synthesis”. The aim is not for authors to present a typical “Review Article” or meta-analysis. The new Biotropica Synthesis papers will be distinguished by being deep in time and site-specific, celebrating the insights that emerge from local, place-based ecology and showing a profound understanding of the site's natural history over a concerted period of time.

How will Synthesis papers work? Synthesis papers will follow the same format as “Reviews”, that is, 8000 word limit (excluding references). As the emphasis is on understanding the insights from a research group's work, extensive self-citations are acceptable and, indeed, expected. However, in contrast to Biotropica's Review paper category, Synthesis papers will be solicited by invitation, referral, or self-referral. The authors of all Synthesis papers are requested to send a brief inquiry email before submission to the Editorial Office that details: the location of the research, the topics or ideas addressed by the research program, the number of years of work that will be synthesized (i.e., we expect 10 years at least), a list of the major publications that will be discussed and a list of potential co-authors that would ideally include graduate students, postdoctoral research associates, and research assistants. If locally based field assistants have made substantial contributions to the work presented in the Synthesis, we strongly recommend authors consider whether their contributions merit co-authorship (see Ramírez-Castaneda et al. 2022). Last, the inquiry should include a couple of sentences on how synthesizing this research program will provide new insights that will be of interest to tropical ecologists, that is, Biotropica readers. The Biotropica Editorial Office will then provide feedback and encourage or discourage a full submission that will be subjected to our standard peer review processes (i.e., submission does not guarantee acceptance). As Synthesis represents a new paper category for Biotropica, we do not yet have a collection of examples to use as guidelines. However, we point potential Synthesis authors to an excellent review paper that exemplifies the goals of this new paper category entitled “Primate life history, social dynamics, ecology, and conservation: Contributions from long-term research in Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica” by Melin et al. (2020). We look forward to receiving your contributions and hope that this new paper category spurs integration and reflection, and also serves to identify future research directions—all of which are necessary to make progress toward answering the big questions in ecology and conservation.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由于 "综合 "是 Biotropica 的一个新论文类别,我们还没有可用作指南的范例集。不过,我们向潜在的 "综述 "作者推荐一篇优秀的综述论文,该论文题为 "灵长类动物的生活史、社会动态、生态学和保护"(Primate life history, social dynamics, ecology, and conservation),体现了这一新论文类别的目标:Melin 等人(2020 年)撰写的 "哥斯达黎加瓜纳卡斯特保护区长期研究的贡献"。我们期待收到您的投稿,并希望这一新的论文类别能够促进整合和反思,同时也有助于确定未来的研究方向--所有这些都是在回答生态学和保护领域的重大问题方面取得进展所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
期刊最新文献
Low Requirement on the Nest Site Selection Influencing the Invasion Success of House Geckos Editorial: Biotropica Announces a New Paper Category: Synthesis Population Variability and Apparent Recent Decline of River Birds in the Indian Himalaya The Abundance and Diversity of Phyllostomid Bats are Influenced by Environmental Factors, Landscape Composition, and Configuration in Oaxaca, Mexico Challenges in the Early Ontogeny of a Mutualistic Plant: Resource Availability and Plant Defense in Juvenile Cecropia Ant-Plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1