Ampicillin and gentamicin prophylaxis is superior to ampicillin alone in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the results of a randomized clinical trial
Raneen Abu Shqara MD , Daniel Glikman MD , Gabriela Goldinfeld MD , Olga Braude MD , Silas Assy MD , Dunia Hassan MD , Inshirah Sgayer MD , Nadir Ganem MD , Hadas Shasha-Lavsky MD , Enav Yefet MD , Marian Matanis MD , Lior Lowenstein MD , Maya Frank Wolf MD
{"title":"Ampicillin and gentamicin prophylaxis is superior to ampicillin alone in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the results of a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Raneen Abu Shqara MD , Daniel Glikman MD , Gabriela Goldinfeld MD , Olga Braude MD , Silas Assy MD , Dunia Hassan MD , Inshirah Sgayer MD , Nadir Ganem MD , Hadas Shasha-Lavsky MD , Enav Yefet MD , Marian Matanis MD , Lior Lowenstein MD , Maya Frank Wolf MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Prelabor rupture of membranes<span> is a risk factor for maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity. Ampicillin is indicated for patients with unknown group B </span></span><em>Streptococcus</em> status and prelabor rupture of membranes ≥18 hours. Although ampicillin-resistant <span><span>Enterobacteriaceae</span></span><span> contribute to maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity, current guidelines on intrapartum<span> antibiotic prophylaxis primarily target group B </span></span><em>Streptococcus</em> and do not adequately cover <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>To compare maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity between 2 antibiotic regimens: ampicillin and </span>gentamicin vs ampicillin alone.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div><span>This randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2022 and March 2024 in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Inclusion criteria were a term singleton pregnancy ≥37 0/7, vertex presentation, unknown group B </span><em>Streptococcus</em><span><span><span> status, and prelabor rupture of membranes without active labor. Exclusion criteria included penicillin/gentamicin allergy, contraindications for vaginal delivery<span>, and current antibiotic treatment. The participants were randomized at 12 to 18 hours post prelabor rupture of membranes to receive ampicillin and gentamicin (n=102) or ampicillin alone (n=102). They were blinded from the allocation until antibiotics initiation at 18 hours post prelabor rupture of membranes. The antibiotics were administered until delivery. The primary outcome was clinical </span></span>chorioamnionitis<span><span><span><span><span>. Secondary maternal outcomes were puerperal </span>endometritis, peripartum infections, intrapartum fever, and a composite of postpartum </span>maternal morbidity<span>, defined as the presence of puerperal endometritis, postpartum antibiotic treatment exceeding 24 hours, </span></span>wound infection<span><span>, or infection-related hospitalization >5 days. A neonatal composite adverse outcome included culture-proven </span>neonatal sepsis, admission to the </span></span>neonatal intensive care unit<span><span>, empiric antibiotic treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit, performance of a sepsis workup, and infection-related hospitalization >5 days. Microbiologic findings were assessed from chorioamniotic swab cultures. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The </span>number needed to treat<span> was calculated for the primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression<span> was conducted to predict clinical chorioamnionitis, after controlling for antibiotic regimen, prelabor rupture of membranes duration, delivery number, </span></span></span></span></span>body mass index<span>, delivery week, maternal age, meconium staining, and diabetes mellitus.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Ampicillin and gentamicin treatment was associated with lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (1/102 [1.0%] vs 8/102 [7.8%], </span><em>P</em>=.035), intrapartum fever (8/102 [8.0%] vs 18/102 [18.0%], <em>P</em>=.036), and overall peripartum infections (1/102 [1.0%] vs 10/102 [9.8%], <em>P</em><span>=.005). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 case of clinical chorioamnionitis was 14.7 (95% confidence interval, 10.2–27.0). The rate of the composite postpartum maternal complications was also lower in the ampicillin and gentamicin group (0/102 [0%] vs 6/102 [5.9%], </span><em>P</em><span>=.029). Ampicillin and gentamicin treatment was associated with lower rates of the composite neonatal adverse outcome (11/102 [10.8%] vs 22/102 [21.6%], </span><em>P</em>=.036) and sepsis workups (8/102 [7.8%] vs 18/102 [17.6%], <em>P</em>=.036) and a shorter median neonatal intensive care unit stay (3.0 vs 3.5 days, <em>P</em>=.047). The frequency of positive <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> cultures in chorioamniotic swab samples was lower following ampicillin and gentamicin (17/85 [20%] vs ampicillin alone 45/89 [51%], <em>P</em><.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In term prelabor rupture of membranes, ampicillin and gentamicin prophylaxis, compared to ampicillin alone, resulted in lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis, maternal postpartum complications, and neonatal adverse outcomes. It is time to reconsider the antimicrobial prophylactic regimen in term prelabor rupture of membranes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"233 4","pages":"Pages 321.e1-321.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937825001565","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prelabor rupture of membranes is a risk factor for maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity. Ampicillin is indicated for patients with unknown group B Streptococcus status and prelabor rupture of membranes ≥18 hours. Although ampicillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae contribute to maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity, current guidelines on intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis primarily target group B Streptococcus and do not adequately cover Enterobacteriaceae.
Objective
To compare maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity between 2 antibiotic regimens: ampicillin and gentamicin vs ampicillin alone.
Study Design
This randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2022 and March 2024 in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Inclusion criteria were a term singleton pregnancy ≥37 0/7, vertex presentation, unknown group B Streptococcus status, and prelabor rupture of membranes without active labor. Exclusion criteria included penicillin/gentamicin allergy, contraindications for vaginal delivery, and current antibiotic treatment. The participants were randomized at 12 to 18 hours post prelabor rupture of membranes to receive ampicillin and gentamicin (n=102) or ampicillin alone (n=102). They were blinded from the allocation until antibiotics initiation at 18 hours post prelabor rupture of membranes. The antibiotics were administered until delivery. The primary outcome was clinical chorioamnionitis. Secondary maternal outcomes were puerperal endometritis, peripartum infections, intrapartum fever, and a composite of postpartum maternal morbidity, defined as the presence of puerperal endometritis, postpartum antibiotic treatment exceeding 24 hours, wound infection, or infection-related hospitalization >5 days. A neonatal composite adverse outcome included culture-proven neonatal sepsis, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, empiric antibiotic treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit, performance of a sepsis workup, and infection-related hospitalization >5 days. Microbiologic findings were assessed from chorioamniotic swab cultures. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The number needed to treat was calculated for the primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to predict clinical chorioamnionitis, after controlling for antibiotic regimen, prelabor rupture of membranes duration, delivery number, body mass index, delivery week, maternal age, meconium staining, and diabetes mellitus.
Results
Ampicillin and gentamicin treatment was associated with lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (1/102 [1.0%] vs 8/102 [7.8%], P=.035), intrapartum fever (8/102 [8.0%] vs 18/102 [18.0%], P=.036), and overall peripartum infections (1/102 [1.0%] vs 10/102 [9.8%], P=.005). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 case of clinical chorioamnionitis was 14.7 (95% confidence interval, 10.2–27.0). The rate of the composite postpartum maternal complications was also lower in the ampicillin and gentamicin group (0/102 [0%] vs 6/102 [5.9%], P=.029). Ampicillin and gentamicin treatment was associated with lower rates of the composite neonatal adverse outcome (11/102 [10.8%] vs 22/102 [21.6%], P=.036) and sepsis workups (8/102 [7.8%] vs 18/102 [17.6%], P=.036) and a shorter median neonatal intensive care unit stay (3.0 vs 3.5 days, P=.047). The frequency of positive Enterobacteriaceae cultures in chorioamniotic swab samples was lower following ampicillin and gentamicin (17/85 [20%] vs ampicillin alone 45/89 [51%], P<.001).
Conclusion
In term prelabor rupture of membranes, ampicillin and gentamicin prophylaxis, compared to ampicillin alone, resulted in lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis, maternal postpartum complications, and neonatal adverse outcomes. It is time to reconsider the antimicrobial prophylactic regimen in term prelabor rupture of membranes.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.