{"title":"Depression and quality of life in patients with Broca's and subcortical stroke-related aphasia: A comparative study.","authors":"Nasrin Shahouzaei, Reihane Saber-Moghadam, Mohammad Taghi Farzadfard, Jamshid Jamali, Davood Sobhani-Rad","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2478513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Aphasia, primarily recognized as a language disorder following stroke, often is presented with concurrent emotional and social difficulties, including depression. This study investigated whether the type of aphasia-Broca's or subcortical-may be related to the prevalence of depression and overall quality of life (QOL) in affected individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study involved 46 individuals with chronic aphasia resulting from left hemisphere strokes. Participants were divided into two groups: those with Broca's aphasia and those with subcortical aphasia. Several assessment tools were utilized, including the Persian versions of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Western Aphasia Battery (P-WAB-1), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that the average severity of aphasia was significantly lower in the Broca's aphasia group (36.48 ± 8.05) compared to the subcortical aphasia group (62.83 ± 19.88). However, both groups demonstrated similar depression severity scores and their quality of life was largely comparable to each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores that living with aphasia, regardless of type, involves emotional and social challenges that may be extended beyond language difficulties, emphasizing the need to address these issues to improve the well-being of stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2478513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Aphasia, primarily recognized as a language disorder following stroke, often is presented with concurrent emotional and social difficulties, including depression. This study investigated whether the type of aphasia-Broca's or subcortical-may be related to the prevalence of depression and overall quality of life (QOL) in affected individuals.
Methods: The present study involved 46 individuals with chronic aphasia resulting from left hemisphere strokes. Participants were divided into two groups: those with Broca's aphasia and those with subcortical aphasia. Several assessment tools were utilized, including the Persian versions of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Western Aphasia Battery (P-WAB-1), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39).
Results: The results indicated that the average severity of aphasia was significantly lower in the Broca's aphasia group (36.48 ± 8.05) compared to the subcortical aphasia group (62.83 ± 19.88). However, both groups demonstrated similar depression severity scores and their quality of life was largely comparable to each other.
Conclusion: This study underscores that living with aphasia, regardless of type, involves emotional and social challenges that may be extended beyond language difficulties, emphasizing the need to address these issues to improve the well-being of stroke survivors.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.