Development of a Tool for Patient-Reported Incidents of Race and Language Bias in an Academic Medical Center.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s40615-025-02375-z
Ashley Odai-Afotey, Delia Shen, Sonya Davey, Alisa Pham, Evan M Shannon, Esteban Gershanik
{"title":"Development of a Tool for Patient-Reported Incidents of Race and Language Bias in an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Ashley Odai-Afotey, Delia Shen, Sonya Davey, Alisa Pham, Evan M Shannon, Esteban Gershanik","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02375-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients from racial and ethnic minoritized groups and with non-English language preference (NELP) face higher risks of bias due to structural racism and systemic inequities. Traditional hospital bias incident reporting systems often lack input from these groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a hospitalized patient incident reporting tool (IRT) to capture events for potential bias, incorporating feedback from racial and ethnic minoritized and NELP patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The IRT was developed using an iterative, participatory approach involving a hospital advisory committee and hospitalized participants in the United States. It was available in six languages and had 26 questions, including Likert-scale and open-ended questions spanning participant experience to reporting preferences.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The IRT was administered to 50 participants admitted to adult internal medicine services at a single academic center. Patient's average age was 50 years, with 50% male, 50% Black, and 40% Latinx. Thirty-eight percent of participants reported NELP.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>A qualitative and quantitative study design was implemented to (1) identify questions with highest response rates and detail, (2) establish questions with highest response among participants who reported bias incidents, and (3) understand participants' reporting preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest responses came from Likert-scale and open-ended questions about treatment and communication. Eleven participants reported an experience of bias. Participants preferred phone call and paper surveys for reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an IRT that captures racial, ethnic, and language-based bias experienced during a hospitalization that reflects the needs of underrepresented populations in hospital safety data. Validation of the tool is needed across different hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02375-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients from racial and ethnic minoritized groups and with non-English language preference (NELP) face higher risks of bias due to structural racism and systemic inequities. Traditional hospital bias incident reporting systems often lack input from these groups.

Objective: To develop a hospitalized patient incident reporting tool (IRT) to capture events for potential bias, incorporating feedback from racial and ethnic minoritized and NELP patients.

Design: The IRT was developed using an iterative, participatory approach involving a hospital advisory committee and hospitalized participants in the United States. It was available in six languages and had 26 questions, including Likert-scale and open-ended questions spanning participant experience to reporting preferences.

Participants: The IRT was administered to 50 participants admitted to adult internal medicine services at a single academic center. Patient's average age was 50 years, with 50% male, 50% Black, and 40% Latinx. Thirty-eight percent of participants reported NELP.

Measures: A qualitative and quantitative study design was implemented to (1) identify questions with highest response rates and detail, (2) establish questions with highest response among participants who reported bias incidents, and (3) understand participants' reporting preferences.

Results: The greatest responses came from Likert-scale and open-ended questions about treatment and communication. Eleven participants reported an experience of bias. Participants preferred phone call and paper surveys for reporting.

Conclusions: We developed an IRT that captures racial, ethnic, and language-based bias experienced during a hospitalization that reflects the needs of underrepresented populations in hospital safety data. Validation of the tool is needed across different hospital settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Tool for Patient-Reported Incidents of Race and Language Bias in an Academic Medical Center. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content on Internal Medicine Fellowship Programs' Webpages. Geospatial Analysis of Tooth Loss Among the US Geriatric Population by Zip Code: The Role of Socioeconomic and Racial Factors. Global Insights on the Involvement of Ethnic Minority Populations in Health and Social Care Research Priority Setting: A Systematic Scoping Review. Racial/Ethnic and Nativity Disparities in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, United States 2018-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1