Interdisciplinary Care for Geriatric Syndromes in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.2215/CJN.0000000658
Aishwarya Subash, Maya Levinson, Kemberlee Bonnet, Rasheeda K Hall, Fahad Saeed, Christine K Liu, Totini S Chatterjee, Amanda S Mixon, Edward R Gould, Sara N Horst, Ebele M Umeukeje, Rachel A Burdick, Warren D Taylor, Kerri L Cavanaugh, David G Schlundt, Devika Nair
{"title":"Interdisciplinary Care for Geriatric Syndromes in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Aishwarya Subash, Maya Levinson, Kemberlee Bonnet, Rasheeda K Hall, Fahad Saeed, Christine K Liu, Totini S Chatterjee, Amanda S Mixon, Edward R Gould, Sara N Horst, Ebele M Umeukeje, Rachel A Burdick, Warren D Taylor, Kerri L Cavanaugh, David G Schlundt, Devika Nair","doi":"10.2215/CJN.0000000658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their prevalence, prognostic significance, and prioritization by patients, key geriatric syndromes, such as cognitive impairment, frailty, and depression are not routinely addressed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care in the United States (US). In an interdisciplinary care model, health professionals with diverse expertise collaborate to address all symptoms and functional impairments occurring alongside a patient's chronic disease. Thus, routinely addressing geriatric syndromes in CKD may require implementing this evidence-based model of care and adapting it to the needs of patients with CKD. In a formative step to understanding how health systems could implement an interdisciplinary model of care to address geriatric syndromes in CKD, we interviewed health professionals around the world with relevant expertise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We interviewed nephrologists, administrators, geriatricians, palliative medicine specialists, subspecialists, and allied health professionals working in other interdisciplinary clinics from the US, United Kingdom, India, and Canada. We analyzed results using an inductive-deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic saturation occurred at 42 experts. Three major domains emerged: barriers to implementation, strategies to mitigate barriers, and benefits of implementation. Barriers were categorized into overarching themes related to 1) aging-friendly policy and workforce availability; 2) organizational culture and structure, and 3) nephrologist and patient perceptions. Strategies to mitigate barriers were categorized into themes related to 1) demonstrating viability; 2) facilitating effective health communication; 3) soliciting support from administrators and clinicians; and 4) expanding the base for patient information and treatment evidence. Proposed benefits of implementation included improved shared decision-making and reduced nephrologist burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing an interdisciplinary model of care that addresses geriatric syndromes in CKD is possible but will require overcoming policy-related, financial, cultural, and structural barriers. Such a model of care may ultimately benefit patients and nephrologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite their prevalence, prognostic significance, and prioritization by patients, key geriatric syndromes, such as cognitive impairment, frailty, and depression are not routinely addressed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care in the United States (US). In an interdisciplinary care model, health professionals with diverse expertise collaborate to address all symptoms and functional impairments occurring alongside a patient's chronic disease. Thus, routinely addressing geriatric syndromes in CKD may require implementing this evidence-based model of care and adapting it to the needs of patients with CKD. In a formative step to understanding how health systems could implement an interdisciplinary model of care to address geriatric syndromes in CKD, we interviewed health professionals around the world with relevant expertise.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We interviewed nephrologists, administrators, geriatricians, palliative medicine specialists, subspecialists, and allied health professionals working in other interdisciplinary clinics from the US, United Kingdom, India, and Canada. We analyzed results using an inductive-deductive approach.

Results: Thematic saturation occurred at 42 experts. Three major domains emerged: barriers to implementation, strategies to mitigate barriers, and benefits of implementation. Barriers were categorized into overarching themes related to 1) aging-friendly policy and workforce availability; 2) organizational culture and structure, and 3) nephrologist and patient perceptions. Strategies to mitigate barriers were categorized into themes related to 1) demonstrating viability; 2) facilitating effective health communication; 3) soliciting support from administrators and clinicians; and 4) expanding the base for patient information and treatment evidence. Proposed benefits of implementation included improved shared decision-making and reduced nephrologist burnout.

Conclusions: Implementing an interdisciplinary model of care that addresses geriatric syndromes in CKD is possible but will require overcoming policy-related, financial, cultural, and structural barriers. Such a model of care may ultimately benefit patients and nephrologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Phosphorus and Metabolic Health in CKD and ESKD. Innovating Kidney Care in Patients with Cancer: The Development of an Inpatient Onconephrology Service. High-Diversity Plant-Based Diet and Gut Microbiome, Plasma Metabolome, and Symptoms in Adults with CKD. Autonomic Nervous System Dysregulation and Bone Health in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Potential for Intervention. Defining Kidney Health Dimensions and their Associations with Adverse Outcomes in Persons with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1