{"title":"Investigation of particle reconstruction quality for three-dimensional light field PIV","authors":"Xiaoyu Zhu , Jiaxing Lu , Md Moinul Hossain , Chuanlong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the reconstruction quality factor, a critical metric for assessing particle position reconstruction accuracy in light field particle image velocimetry (LF-PIV). Key factors influencing the reconstruction quality are analyzed, and a benchmark criterion for reconstruction quality is proposed to ensure high-accuracy three-dimensional flow measurement. Numerical reconstructions of random particle and 3D displacement fields are performed to optimize the tomographic and deep learning reconstruction approaches. Strategies for generating optimal datasets for deep learning models are presented. The findings indicate that the generation of ghost particles and the omission of true particles are the primary causes of low reconstruction quality. The latter has a more noticeable impact, particularly when ghost particle intensities are significantly lower than true particles. A reconstruction quality factor of above 0.7 is recommended for reliable, high-accuracy flow measurements. Learning-based methods outperform tomographic algorithms in particle reconstruction, achieving comparable reconstruction accuracy with a single light field camera (LFC) to that of tomographic methods using dual LFCs. To generate high-quality datasets for deep learning, an optimal angular separation of 0.01° between sampling rays, a seeding density range of 0∼1 particle per microlens, and variable particle peak intensities are suggested. Additionally, incorporating noise at 10 % of the image intensity standard deviation into training data significantly enhances model robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598625000809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the reconstruction quality factor, a critical metric for assessing particle position reconstruction accuracy in light field particle image velocimetry (LF-PIV). Key factors influencing the reconstruction quality are analyzed, and a benchmark criterion for reconstruction quality is proposed to ensure high-accuracy three-dimensional flow measurement. Numerical reconstructions of random particle and 3D displacement fields are performed to optimize the tomographic and deep learning reconstruction approaches. Strategies for generating optimal datasets for deep learning models are presented. The findings indicate that the generation of ghost particles and the omission of true particles are the primary causes of low reconstruction quality. The latter has a more noticeable impact, particularly when ghost particle intensities are significantly lower than true particles. A reconstruction quality factor of above 0.7 is recommended for reliable, high-accuracy flow measurements. Learning-based methods outperform tomographic algorithms in particle reconstruction, achieving comparable reconstruction accuracy with a single light field camera (LFC) to that of tomographic methods using dual LFCs. To generate high-quality datasets for deep learning, an optimal angular separation of 0.01° between sampling rays, a seeding density range of 0∼1 particle per microlens, and variable particle peak intensities are suggested. Additionally, incorporating noise at 10 % of the image intensity standard deviation into training data significantly enhances model robustness.
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.