Made With Love: Examining Consumer Engagement With Handmade Versus Machine-Made Production Cues

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1002/cb.2455
Tuba Degirmenci, Frank Mathmann, Gary Mortimer
{"title":"Made With Love: Examining Consumer Engagement With Handmade Versus Machine-Made Production Cues","authors":"Tuba Degirmenci,&nbsp;Frank Mathmann,&nbsp;Gary Mortimer","doi":"10.1002/cb.2455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Advancing technologies have led to structural change in production methods, influencing not only business practices but also significantly reshaping consumer mindsets. Businesses increasingly utilise production cues, such as ‘handmade’, to differentiate their products and foster consumer engagement. While prior studies demonstrate that production cues can affect consumer responses, it remains unclear how the impact of these cues (e.g., handmade vs. machine-made) differs between consumer segments. Marketers remain uncertain about how to strategically leverage these effects across consumer profiles and product portfolios. Addressing this gap, this research applies regulatory mode theory, providing a nuanced understanding of production cues' impact on consumer engagement, with a focus on locomotion regulatory mode. Study 1, an online survey experiment, presents a moderated mediation analysis: while the effect of production cues on willingness to pay is mediated through love, this impact significantly varies with consumers' locomotion regulatory mode (low vs. high). Study 2 extends these findings through an automated text analysis of social media data (<i>n</i> = 9380), validating the moderating role of locomotion in a real-world context by analysing the marketer-generated content of Facebook posts. The findings of both studies confirm our predictions that production cues elicit distinct engagement responses depending on consumer segments: high-locomotion consumers, who value efficiency, show diminished engagement with production cues. This research advances the theory of production cue effects by offering novel insights and provides marketers with actionable implications for segmentation and targeted communication.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","volume":"24 2","pages":"982-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancing technologies have led to structural change in production methods, influencing not only business practices but also significantly reshaping consumer mindsets. Businesses increasingly utilise production cues, such as ‘handmade’, to differentiate their products and foster consumer engagement. While prior studies demonstrate that production cues can affect consumer responses, it remains unclear how the impact of these cues (e.g., handmade vs. machine-made) differs between consumer segments. Marketers remain uncertain about how to strategically leverage these effects across consumer profiles and product portfolios. Addressing this gap, this research applies regulatory mode theory, providing a nuanced understanding of production cues' impact on consumer engagement, with a focus on locomotion regulatory mode. Study 1, an online survey experiment, presents a moderated mediation analysis: while the effect of production cues on willingness to pay is mediated through love, this impact significantly varies with consumers' locomotion regulatory mode (low vs. high). Study 2 extends these findings through an automated text analysis of social media data (n = 9380), validating the moderating role of locomotion in a real-world context by analysing the marketer-generated content of Facebook posts. The findings of both studies confirm our predictions that production cues elicit distinct engagement responses depending on consumer segments: high-locomotion consumers, who value efficiency, show diminished engagement with production cues. This research advances the theory of production cue effects by offering novel insights and provides marketers with actionable implications for segmentation and targeted communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用爱制造:考察消费者对手工制造与机器制造生产线索的参与度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.60%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Behaviour aims to promote the understanding of consumer behaviour, consumer research and consumption through the publication of double-blind peer-reviewed, top quality theoretical and empirical research. An international academic journal with a foundation in the social sciences, the JCB has a diverse and multidisciplinary outlook which seeks to showcase innovative, alternative and contested representations of consumer behaviour alongside the latest developments in established traditions of consumer research.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Served or Exploited: The Impact of Data Capture Strategy on Users' Intention to Use Selected AI Systems Roles of Traditional, Online-Specific, and Cross-Channel Marketing Instruments in Multi- and Omnichannel Fashion Retail Brand Equity Made With Love: Examining Consumer Engagement With Handmade Versus Machine-Made Production Cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1