Efficiency of Sequential Extraction Schemes in Partitioning Toxic Elements in Acid Sulfate Soils With a Thionic Horizon

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/ejss.70090
Francis Henrique Tenório Firmino, João Carlos Ker, Maurício Paulo Ferreira Fontes, Jaime Wilson Vargas de Mello, Hidelblandi Farias de Melo, Luiz Felipe Mesquita
{"title":"Efficiency of Sequential Extraction Schemes in Partitioning Toxic Elements in Acid Sulfate Soils With a Thionic Horizon","authors":"Francis Henrique Tenório Firmino,&nbsp;João Carlos Ker,&nbsp;Maurício Paulo Ferreira Fontes,&nbsp;Jaime Wilson Vargas de Mello,&nbsp;Hidelblandi Farias de Melo,&nbsp;Luiz Felipe Mesquita","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of sequential extraction methods is a common practice for analysing the availability of potentially toxic elements in soils and sediments. However, the simultaneous presence of oxidisable and reducible minerals in acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon raises questions about the accuracy of these methods. This study focused on the comparative evaluation of two sequential extraction schemes—the modified BCR method (four steps) and the modified Tessier method (six steps) - in acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon in the Delta of the Doce River region, Espírito Santo, Brazil. With particular attention to the presence of jarosite, a mineral associated with the sulfurization process, specific tests were conducted to better understand the performance of reducible extractors on its synthetic phase. The results highlight the complex dynamics of acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon concerning the distribution of iron and potentially toxic elements. A significant divergence was observed between the two sequential extraction methods in identifying the main reservoir of potentially toxic elements. In the modified BCR method, metals were primarily associated with oxidizable iron fractions, including organic matter. In contrast, the modified Tessier method indicated metals in the reducible iron fractions, suggesting a different interpretation of the mobility and bioavailability of the elements. The comparative analysis revealed that the modified Tessier procedure is more effective in characterising acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon for the following reasons: (1) it provides greater precision in evaluating the soil's exchangeable fraction; (2) it avoids underestimating the reducible fraction, capturing the dissolution of sulfide oxidation products; (3) it more accurately identifies elements associated with sulfide minerals; and (4) it offers a more precise quantification of the residual fraction. However, a limitation of the modified Tessier method is the omission of the influence of organic matter, an important component in the dynamics of elements in hydromorphic environments, emphasising the need for complementary approaches for a comprehensive understanding of the availability of potentially toxic elements (trace metal) in such soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of sequential extraction methods is a common practice for analysing the availability of potentially toxic elements in soils and sediments. However, the simultaneous presence of oxidisable and reducible minerals in acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon raises questions about the accuracy of these methods. This study focused on the comparative evaluation of two sequential extraction schemes—the modified BCR method (four steps) and the modified Tessier method (six steps) - in acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon in the Delta of the Doce River region, Espírito Santo, Brazil. With particular attention to the presence of jarosite, a mineral associated with the sulfurization process, specific tests were conducted to better understand the performance of reducible extractors on its synthetic phase. The results highlight the complex dynamics of acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon concerning the distribution of iron and potentially toxic elements. A significant divergence was observed between the two sequential extraction methods in identifying the main reservoir of potentially toxic elements. In the modified BCR method, metals were primarily associated with oxidizable iron fractions, including organic matter. In contrast, the modified Tessier method indicated metals in the reducible iron fractions, suggesting a different interpretation of the mobility and bioavailability of the elements. The comparative analysis revealed that the modified Tessier procedure is more effective in characterising acid sulfate soils with a thionic horizon for the following reasons: (1) it provides greater precision in evaluating the soil's exchangeable fraction; (2) it avoids underestimating the reducible fraction, capturing the dissolution of sulfide oxidation products; (3) it more accurately identifies elements associated with sulfide minerals; and (4) it offers a more precise quantification of the residual fraction. However, a limitation of the modified Tessier method is the omission of the influence of organic matter, an important component in the dynamics of elements in hydromorphic environments, emphasising the need for complementary approaches for a comprehensive understanding of the availability of potentially toxic elements (trace metal) in such soils.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Pedotransfer Functions Versus Model Structure: What Drives Variance in Agro-Hydrological Model Results? Efficiency of Sequential Extraction Schemes in Partitioning Toxic Elements in Acid Sulfate Soils With a Thionic Horizon Mineralogical Changes in Acid Sulfate Soils With Thionic Horizons: Insights From the Delta Doce River, Brazil Erosion Evolution in the Source Regions of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers From a Climate-Ecology-Hydrology Zoning Perspective Development of a Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Ergosterol in Forest Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1