Development of a Standardized Protocol to Measure the (An)aerobic Capacity on a Roller Ergometer Among Wheelchair Athletes

Rowie J. F. Janssen, Riemer J. K. Vegter, Han Houdijk, Lucas H.V. van der Woude, Sonja de Groot
{"title":"Development of a Standardized Protocol to Measure the (An)aerobic Capacity on a Roller Ergometer Among Wheelchair Athletes","authors":"Rowie J. F. Janssen,&nbsp;Riemer J. K. Vegter,&nbsp;Han Houdijk,&nbsp;Lucas H.V. van der Woude,&nbsp;Sonja de Groot","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To evaluate and update about previous regression equations to derive standardized and individualized resistance settings for wheelchair-specific anaerobic and aerobic capacity tests in wheelchair athletes. An isometric strength test, a sprint test, a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT), and an aerobic graded exercise test (GXT) were performed by 43 wheelchair athletes on a computerized roller ergometer. Using previously developed regression equations, measured strength predicted anaerobic power and determined the individual's WAnT resistance. Subsequently, measured anaerobic power predicted aerobic power and determined the individual's GXT resistances. The WAnT was considered valid when peak rim velocity stayed below 3 m·s<sup>−1</sup> and the GXT when the test duration was between 8 and 12 min. After testing, individual test results were used to construct new regression equations to improve predictions for anaerobic and aerobic power. The strength test turned out to be nonstatic for the five strongest athletes. Consequently, their WAnT resistance was underestimated, resulting in the highest peak rim velocities. The GXT had durations below 8 min for seven athletes. The sprint test was feasible for every athlete and showed a better prediction for anaerobic power (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.84). The updated regression equation to predict aerobic power from anaerobic power resulted in an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.78. For future testing in wheelchair athletes, it is advised to use the newly developed athlete-specific regression equations to predict (an) aerobic power and to set adequate WAnT and GXT resistances. These standardized and individualized settings will lead to interathlete and intra-athlete comparable measures, used for athlete monitoring or to set training guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12275","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate and update about previous regression equations to derive standardized and individualized resistance settings for wheelchair-specific anaerobic and aerobic capacity tests in wheelchair athletes. An isometric strength test, a sprint test, a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT), and an aerobic graded exercise test (GXT) were performed by 43 wheelchair athletes on a computerized roller ergometer. Using previously developed regression equations, measured strength predicted anaerobic power and determined the individual's WAnT resistance. Subsequently, measured anaerobic power predicted aerobic power and determined the individual's GXT resistances. The WAnT was considered valid when peak rim velocity stayed below 3 m·s−1 and the GXT when the test duration was between 8 and 12 min. After testing, individual test results were used to construct new regression equations to improve predictions for anaerobic and aerobic power. The strength test turned out to be nonstatic for the five strongest athletes. Consequently, their WAnT resistance was underestimated, resulting in the highest peak rim velocities. The GXT had durations below 8 min for seven athletes. The sprint test was feasible for every athlete and showed a better prediction for anaerobic power (R2 = 0.84). The updated regression equation to predict aerobic power from anaerobic power resulted in an R2 of 0.78. For future testing in wheelchair athletes, it is advised to use the newly developed athlete-specific regression equations to predict (an) aerobic power and to set adequate WAnT and GXT resistances. These standardized and individualized settings will lead to interathlete and intra-athlete comparable measures, used for athlete monitoring or to set training guidelines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在轮椅运动员中使用滚轴测力仪测量有氧能力的标准方案的开发
评估和更新先前的回归方程,以获得轮椅运动员特定的无氧和有氧能力测试的标准化和个性化阻力设置。对43名轮椅运动员进行了等长强度测试、冲刺测试、温盖特无氧测试(WAnT)和有氧分级运动测试(GXT)。使用先前开发的回归方程,测量强度预测无氧能力并确定个体的WAnT阻力。随后,测量无氧能力预测有氧能力,并确定个体的GXT阻力。当峰值圈速低于3 m·s−1时,认为WAnT有效,当测试持续时间在8到12分钟之间时,认为GXT有效。测试后,单个测试结果用于构建新的回归方程,以改进厌氧和有氧能力的预测。对于五个最强壮的运动员来说,力量测试是非静态的。因此,他们的万向阻力被低估,导致最高的峰值边缘速度。7名运动员的GXT持续时间低于8分钟。冲刺测试对每个运动员都是可行的,并且对无氧功率的预测效果更好(R2 = 0.84)。更新的回归方程预测无氧能力的有氧能力的R2为0.78。对于未来轮椅运动员的测试,建议使用新开发的运动员特异性回归方程来预测(a)有氧能力,并设置足够的WAnT和GXT阻力。这些标准化和个性化的设置将导致运动员之间和运动员内部的可比措施,用于运动员监测或制定训练指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National-Standard Middle-Distance Runners Maintain 1500 m Time Trial Running Performance on Successive Days. Navigating the Data Processing Maze: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms. Comparison of Sprint Deceleration Capacity in Front- and Side-Facing End Stances in Multidirectional Team Sport Athletes. Linking Sport Participation With Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviours in Adolescents: The Moderating Role of Perceived Coach and Physical Education Teacher Character-Building Competency. The Assessment of the Effect of Gaze Direction Instruction on the Stabilisation During Artistic Gymnastic Landing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1