Aggregation and disaggregation of red blood cells: depletion versus bridging.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS Biophysical journal Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007
Nicolas Moreno, Kirill Korneev, Alexey Semenov, Alper Topuz, Thomas John, Minne Paul Lettinga, Marco Ellero, Christian Wagner, Dmitry A Fedosov
{"title":"Aggregation and disaggregation of red blood cells: depletion versus bridging.","authors":"Nicolas Moreno, Kirill Korneev, Alexey Semenov, Alper Topuz, Thomas John, Minne Paul Lettinga, Marco Ellero, Christian Wagner, Dmitry A Fedosov","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aggregation of red blood cells (RBCs) is a complex phenomenon that strongly impacts blood flow and tissue perfusion. Despite extensive research for more than 50 years, physical mechanisms that govern RBC aggregation are still under debate. Two proposed mechanisms are based on bridging and depletion interactions between RBCs due to the presence of macromolecules in blood plasma. The bridging hypothesis assumes the formation of bonds between RBCs through adsorbing macromolecules, while the depletion mechanism results from the exclusion of macromolecules from the inter-cellular space, leading to effective attraction. Existing experimental studies generally cannot differentiate between these two aggregation mechanisms, though several recent investigations suggest concurrent involvement of the both mechanisms. We explore dynamic aggregation and disaggregation of two RBCs using three simulation models: a potential-based model mimicking depletion interactions, a bridging model with immobile bonds, and a new bridging model with mobile bonds which can slide along RBC membranes. Simulation results indicate that dynamic aggregation of RBCs primarily arises from depletion interactions, while disaggregation of RBCs involves both mechanisms. The bridging model with mobile bonds reproduces well the corresponding experimental data, offering insights into the interplay between bridging and depletion interactions and providing a framework for studying similar interactions between other biological cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aggregation of red blood cells (RBCs) is a complex phenomenon that strongly impacts blood flow and tissue perfusion. Despite extensive research for more than 50 years, physical mechanisms that govern RBC aggregation are still under debate. Two proposed mechanisms are based on bridging and depletion interactions between RBCs due to the presence of macromolecules in blood plasma. The bridging hypothesis assumes the formation of bonds between RBCs through adsorbing macromolecules, while the depletion mechanism results from the exclusion of macromolecules from the inter-cellular space, leading to effective attraction. Existing experimental studies generally cannot differentiate between these two aggregation mechanisms, though several recent investigations suggest concurrent involvement of the both mechanisms. We explore dynamic aggregation and disaggregation of two RBCs using three simulation models: a potential-based model mimicking depletion interactions, a bridging model with immobile bonds, and a new bridging model with mobile bonds which can slide along RBC membranes. Simulation results indicate that dynamic aggregation of RBCs primarily arises from depletion interactions, while disaggregation of RBCs involves both mechanisms. The bridging model with mobile bonds reproduces well the corresponding experimental data, offering insights into the interplay between bridging and depletion interactions and providing a framework for studying similar interactions between other biological cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
期刊最新文献
Measurement force, speed and post-mortem time affect the ratio of CNS grey to white matter elasticity. Buckling of red blood cell membrane in narrow capillaries induces excessive wall shear stress. Structural and Hydrodynamic Characterization of Dimeric Human Oligoadenylate Synthetase 2. Aggregation and disaggregation of red blood cells: depletion versus bridging. Control of cardiac waves in human iPSC-CM syncytia by a Halbach array and magnetic nanoparticles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1