High Rates of Dysplasia in a Population-based Analysis of "Incidental" Barrett's Esophagus.

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.017
Jennifer M Kolb, Christian Davis, J Lucas Williams, Jennifer Holub, Nicholas Shaheen, Sachin Wani
{"title":"High Rates of Dysplasia in a Population-based Analysis of \"Incidental\" Barrett's Esophagus.","authors":"Jennifer M Kolb, Christian Davis, J Lucas Williams, Jennifer Holub, Nicholas Shaheen, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Current screening and surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE) identifies only a minority of esophageal adenocarcinomas. Novel testing modalities may allow broadening of indications for BE screening. Whether such efforts are warranted depends on the characteristics of additional BE cases discovered, and their risk of progression. This study used national benchmarking data to characterize \"incidental\" BE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upper endoscopies with BE in GI Quality Improvement Consortium (GIQuIC) Registry from January 2015 to July 2022 were categorized by indication: BE screening, surveillance, or non-BE-related (\"incidental\"). Demographics, disease-specific characteristics, and dysplasia detection rate (DDR: low and high-grade dysplasia) were compared, as well as adherence to quality indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 88,370 cases (67.3% male; 74.0% white) with histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia, 88.1% were nondysplastic (NDBE). Most cases were performed for BE surveillance (65.0%). Incidental BE (16.4%) occurred almost as frequently as BE found in screening exams (18.6%). The mean BE segment length was longer in incidental BE (2.9 cm) than BE screening (2.6 cm) or surveillance (2.8 cm; P < .001). DDR was actually highest in incidental BE (3.8%), compared with surveillance or screening exams (2.5% and 3.3%; P < .0001). Adherence to appropriate surveillance was similar in incidental and screening (54.5% and 51.9%), with higher adherence in the surveillance group (73.6%; P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BE is found incidentally at rates approaching those seen in dedicated screening exams. Incidental BE is not only common but has similar or worse high-risk features as BE in traditional screening and surveillance populations, given segment length and dysplasia yield. Refinement of BE screening programs could yield cases of similar risk of progression as traditional programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Current screening and surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE) identifies only a minority of esophageal adenocarcinomas. Novel testing modalities may allow broadening of indications for BE screening. Whether such efforts are warranted depends on the characteristics of additional BE cases discovered, and their risk of progression. This study used national benchmarking data to characterize "incidental" BE.

Methods: Upper endoscopies with BE in GI Quality Improvement Consortium (GIQuIC) Registry from January 2015 to July 2022 were categorized by indication: BE screening, surveillance, or non-BE-related ("incidental"). Demographics, disease-specific characteristics, and dysplasia detection rate (DDR: low and high-grade dysplasia) were compared, as well as adherence to quality indicators.

Results: Of 88,370 cases (67.3% male; 74.0% white) with histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia, 88.1% were nondysplastic (NDBE). Most cases were performed for BE surveillance (65.0%). Incidental BE (16.4%) occurred almost as frequently as BE found in screening exams (18.6%). The mean BE segment length was longer in incidental BE (2.9 cm) than BE screening (2.6 cm) or surveillance (2.8 cm; P < .001). DDR was actually highest in incidental BE (3.8%), compared with surveillance or screening exams (2.5% and 3.3%; P < .0001). Adherence to appropriate surveillance was similar in incidental and screening (54.5% and 51.9%), with higher adherence in the surveillance group (73.6%; P < .0001).

Conclusion: BE is found incidentally at rates approaching those seen in dedicated screening exams. Incidental BE is not only common but has similar or worse high-risk features as BE in traditional screening and surveillance populations, given segment length and dysplasia yield. Refinement of BE screening programs could yield cases of similar risk of progression as traditional programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以人群为基础的“偶发性”巴雷特食管分析中,发育不良的高发率。
背景和目的:目前巴雷特食管(BE)的筛查和监测只发现了少数食管腺癌。新的检测方式可以扩大BE筛查的适应症。这些努力是否值得取决于发现的其他BE病例的特征及其进展的风险。本研究使用国家基准数据来描述“偶发”BE。方法:2015年1月至2022年7月在胃肠道质量改善联盟(GIQuIC)注册中心进行的上消化道内窥镜检查中发现BE,根据适应症进行分类:BE筛查、监测或非BE相关(“偶然”)。比较了人口统计学、疾病特异性特征、异常增生检出率(DDR:低级别和高级别异常增生)以及对质量指标的依从性。结果:组织学证实的88,370例肠化生(男性61.2%,白人74.0%)中,88.1%为非发育不良(NDBE)。大多数病例为BE监测(65.0%)。偶发BE(16.4%)发生的频率几乎与筛查检查发现BE(18.6%)相同。偶然发现的BE平均节段长度(2.9cm)比BE筛查(2.6 cm)或监测(2.8 cm)要长。结论:偶然发现的BE的比率接近专门筛查检查的比率。在传统的筛查和监测人群中,偶发BE不仅常见,而且具有与BE相似或更差的高风险特征,考虑到节段长度和发育不良的发生率。改进BE筛查方案可以产生与传统方案相似的进展风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Areas with high prevalence of liver disease have more adverts for alcohol and unhealthy food. Efficacy of Biological and Steroid Therapies in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis with Meta-regression. hEDS and the Nosology of Disorders of Gut Brain Interaction. MetALD in Women: Epidemiology, Natural History, and Clinical Outcomes. Update of geospatial clusters of colorectal cancer in the US to prioritize screening interventions - What has changed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1