{"title":"Association between residents' work hours and patient care ownership: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.","authors":"Hirohisa Fujikawa, Hidetaka Tamune, Yuji Nishizaki, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Masanori Nojima, Miwa Sekine, Taro Shimizu, Yu Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Shikino, Yasuharu Tokuda","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06941-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the current era of physician work-hour regulations, patient care ownership (PCO) has received considerable attention. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between working hours and PCO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide cross-sectional study. The study recruited residents who completed the General Medicine In-Training Examination. The primary outcome was PCO, assessed using the Japanese version of the PCO Scale (J-PCOS). The secondary outcomes were the four dimensions of the J-PCOS (i.e., assertiveness, sense of ownership, diligence, and being the \"go-to\" person). The explanatory variable was weekly working hours. We examined the association using multivariable linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1836 participants were included in the analysis. After adjustment for possible confounders, residents working ≥ 70 to < 90 h/week had greater PCO than those working ≥ 60 to < 70 h/week. Working ≥ 70 to < 90 h/week was also associated with assertiveness and being the \"go-to\" person. No clear trend was seen in the relationship between working hours and sense of ownership or diligence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While determining appropriate resident work hours requires comprehensive consideration of a number of factors, in terms of PCO training, the working hours of 80-90 h/week may be an option.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06941-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: In the current era of physician work-hour regulations, patient care ownership (PCO) has received considerable attention. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between working hours and PCO.
Methods: This was a nationwide cross-sectional study. The study recruited residents who completed the General Medicine In-Training Examination. The primary outcome was PCO, assessed using the Japanese version of the PCO Scale (J-PCOS). The secondary outcomes were the four dimensions of the J-PCOS (i.e., assertiveness, sense of ownership, diligence, and being the "go-to" person). The explanatory variable was weekly working hours. We examined the association using multivariable linear regression analysis.
Results: 1836 participants were included in the analysis. After adjustment for possible confounders, residents working ≥ 70 to < 90 h/week had greater PCO than those working ≥ 60 to < 70 h/week. Working ≥ 70 to < 90 h/week was also associated with assertiveness and being the "go-to" person. No clear trend was seen in the relationship between working hours and sense of ownership or diligence.
Conclusion: While determining appropriate resident work hours requires comprehensive consideration of a number of factors, in terms of PCO training, the working hours of 80-90 h/week may be an option.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.