SEEKING OPTIMAL, INTEGRATED PEDIATRIC MEDICAL AND SOCIAL CARE: A QUALITATIVE, PEER RESEARCHER-DRIVEN STUDY.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2025.102816
Margaret N Jones, Clare Heaney, Jessica Obayan, Daniela Vollmer, Monica Arenas, Malika Muhammad, Raffel Prophett, Patricia White, Moshe Seid, Elizabeth B Quinonez, Lauren Lipps, Adrienne W Henize, Ndidi I Unaka, Andrew F Beck
{"title":"SEEKING OPTIMAL, INTEGRATED PEDIATRIC MEDICAL AND SOCIAL CARE: A QUALITATIVE, PEER RESEARCHER-DRIVEN STUDY.","authors":"Margaret N Jones, Clare Heaney, Jessica Obayan, Daniela Vollmer, Monica Arenas, Malika Muhammad, Raffel Prophett, Patricia White, Moshe Seid, Elizabeth B Quinonez, Lauren Lipps, Adrienne W Henize, Ndidi I Unaka, Andrew F Beck","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate qualitative insights with patients, families, and community partners to catalyze nimble, aligned medical-social care responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed qualitative and co-design methods. We partnered with 4 peer researchers who interviewed individuals living in Greater Cincinnati with recent experience as pediatric patients or caregivers of pediatric patients. Interviews assessed ways in which health care, human services, patients, families, and communities do (or do not) collaborate to provide medical-social care. Interview transcripts were independently reviewed by an analytic team inclusive of peer researchers, co-design experts, and pediatric clinicians and researchers. Findings were validated during community discussions, facilitating identification of themes and opportunity areas for intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peer researchers conducted 19 interviews (14 English, 5 Spanish). Interviewees included individuals ranging from young adults (recent patients) to older adults with lived experience as caregivers of pediatric patients. Most identified as minority race/ethnicity and lived in socioeconomically-disadvantaged Cincinnati neighborhoods. Themes related to structural barriers included: 1) services are difficult to navigate; 2) medical and social care are often reactive (or non-existent) when they could be proactive; and 3) medical and social care could be more closely integrated. Themes related to human factors included: 4) medical and social service institutions are often untrustworthy; 5) diversified care teams with shared lived experiences could improve care delivery; and 6) optimal care requires empathy, clear communication, and partnership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients, families, and community members identified themes and opportunity areas for improving medical and social care delivery. Next steps include implementation and evaluation of prototype interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102816"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.102816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To generate qualitative insights with patients, families, and community partners to catalyze nimble, aligned medical-social care responses.

Methods: This study employed qualitative and co-design methods. We partnered with 4 peer researchers who interviewed individuals living in Greater Cincinnati with recent experience as pediatric patients or caregivers of pediatric patients. Interviews assessed ways in which health care, human services, patients, families, and communities do (or do not) collaborate to provide medical-social care. Interview transcripts were independently reviewed by an analytic team inclusive of peer researchers, co-design experts, and pediatric clinicians and researchers. Findings were validated during community discussions, facilitating identification of themes and opportunity areas for intervention.

Results: Peer researchers conducted 19 interviews (14 English, 5 Spanish). Interviewees included individuals ranging from young adults (recent patients) to older adults with lived experience as caregivers of pediatric patients. Most identified as minority race/ethnicity and lived in socioeconomically-disadvantaged Cincinnati neighborhoods. Themes related to structural barriers included: 1) services are difficult to navigate; 2) medical and social care are often reactive (or non-existent) when they could be proactive; and 3) medical and social care could be more closely integrated. Themes related to human factors included: 4) medical and social service institutions are often untrustworthy; 5) diversified care teams with shared lived experiences could improve care delivery; and 6) optimal care requires empathy, clear communication, and partnership.

Conclusions: Patients, families, and community members identified themes and opportunity areas for improving medical and social care delivery. Next steps include implementation and evaluation of prototype interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and Utility of an Electronic Consultation Program in a Children's Health System. Geospatial Accessibility to Pediatric Resources according to Child Opportunity, Race/Ethnic Composition and Urbanicity. SEEKING OPTIMAL, INTEGRATED PEDIATRIC MEDICAL AND SOCIAL CARE: A QUALITATIVE, PEER RESEARCHER-DRIVEN STUDY. Associations Between Residency Program Size and Readiness for Unsupervised Practice in Pediatrics. Prevalence and Trends in Pediatric-Onset Chronic Conditions in the United States, 1999-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1