“We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES East European Politics and Societies Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1177/08883254251321177
Ekaterina Pierson-Lyzhina
{"title":"“We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile","authors":"Ekaterina Pierson-Lyzhina","doi":"10.1177/08883254251321177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores radicalization processes among the Belarusian opposition-in-exile using resource mobilization theory. Drawing on the case of the post-2020 opposition, exiled in the European Union and recognized by the West as a privileged interlocutor and “legitimate representative of the [Belarusian] people,” it identifies the stages of its radicalization in response to repression in Belarus and Russia’s aggression against Ukraine: first a peaceful approach, then emphasis on self-defense, and finally preparation for violent resistance. It explains each stage by the aggregation and maintenance of a “resource threshold.” It counts domestic/exile networks and Western allies as resources crucial for activism among the exiled opposition. The article also argues that different strategies (peaceful versus violent) have been useful for achieving the resource threshold of the Belarusian opposition-in-exile depending on the domestic, host states’, and sponsor states’ political and geopolitical environments.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251321177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores radicalization processes among the Belarusian opposition-in-exile using resource mobilization theory. Drawing on the case of the post-2020 opposition, exiled in the European Union and recognized by the West as a privileged interlocutor and “legitimate representative of the [Belarusian] people,” it identifies the stages of its radicalization in response to repression in Belarus and Russia’s aggression against Ukraine: first a peaceful approach, then emphasis on self-defense, and finally preparation for violent resistance. It explains each stage by the aggregation and maintenance of a “resource threshold.” It counts domestic/exile networks and Western allies as resources crucial for activism among the exiled opposition. The article also argues that different strategies (peaceful versus violent) have been useful for achieving the resource threshold of the Belarusian opposition-in-exile depending on the domestic, host states’, and sponsor states’ political and geopolitical environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文运用资源动员理论探讨了白俄罗斯流亡反对派的激进化进程。文章以 2020 年后流亡到欧盟、被西方承认为享有特权的对话者和"[白俄罗斯]人民的合法代表 "的反对派为例,指出了其激进化应对白俄罗斯镇压和俄罗斯侵略乌克兰的各个阶段:首先是和平方式,然后是强调自卫,最后是准备暴力抵抗。它通过 "资源门槛 "的聚集和维持来解释每个阶段。文章将国内/流亡网络和西方盟友视为流亡反对派积极行动的关键资源。文章还认为,根据白俄罗斯国内、东道国和赞助国的政治和地缘政治环境,不同的战略(和平战略与暴力战略)有助于白俄罗斯流亡反对派达到资源门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Public Issue Salience: Evidence from Czechia “We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile Platens from the Past: Yugonostalgia and the UNIS-tbm Typewriter Neo-Feudalism and Neo-Traditionalism as Responses to Liberalism Expelled from the Fairytale: The Impact of the Dissident Legacy on Post-1989 Central European Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1