Optimizing detection methods for MRSA isolated from mastitis cases and assessing virulence genes

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105609
Selda Beker , Serpil Kahya Demirbilek
{"title":"Optimizing detection methods for MRSA isolated from mastitis cases and assessing virulence genes","authors":"Selda Beker ,&nbsp;Serpil Kahya Demirbilek","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of bacterial identification methods, BD Phoenix™100 and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), for the identification of Methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) and to select the most reliable method. This study was supported by the inclusion of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques to improve the reliability of MRSA detection. For this purpose, 350 milk samples were collected from different farms and cultured for isolation of <em>Staphylococcus</em> spp., using the salt enrichment culture method. 232 strains were isolated which were further identified with the BD Phoenix™100 system; however, only 204 of these were identified as <em>Staphylococcus</em> spp., 28 of these were unidentified by MALDI-TOF MS. The Maldi Biotype software accurately identified 119 of these isolates at the species level and 85 at the genus level. BD Phoenix™100 demonstrated remarkable accuracy, identifying 100 % of the isolates as <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (39/39). In contrast, the MALDI-TOF MS method identified 94.8 % of the isolates as <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (37/39). Both identification systems confirmed a total of 37 strains of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. We confirmed <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> by PCR using the <em>spa</em> 83.7 % (31/37) and <em>nuc</em> 86.4 % (32/37) genes. Using the PCR method, we successfully detected the <em>mecA</em> 0.9 % (2/204), and the <em>blaZ</em> 17.6 % (36/204) gene for beta-lactam antibiotic resistance (beta-lactamase-penicillinase) but did not find <em>mecC</em> and PVL genes from any of the isolates. The antibiotic susceptibility test results were determined for all isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. This demonstrated that they exhibited the highest resistance to ampicillin 53.9 % and penicillin 52.4 %, followed by tetracycline 21.07 %, clindamycin 18.6 % and oxacillin 18.1 %. Additionally, a total of 18.6 % (38/204) isolates exhibited resistance to antibiotics belonging to more than three groups of antibiotics and were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). The results obtained from MALDI-TOF-MS showed a concordance rate of 41.7 % with the findings from the BD Phoenix™100, as confirmed by statistical analysis. This level of agreement indicates a significant divergence between the two methods. This discrepancy highlights the need for additional studies to thoroughly assess the comparative effectiveness and reliability of MALDI-TOF-MS and BD Phoenix™100 in identifying microbial species. Such evaluations could help determine the strengths and limitations of each method, ultimately guiding the laboratory and improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 105609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of bacterial identification methods, BD Phoenix™100 and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), for the identification of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to select the most reliable method. This study was supported by the inclusion of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques to improve the reliability of MRSA detection. For this purpose, 350 milk samples were collected from different farms and cultured for isolation of Staphylococcus spp., using the salt enrichment culture method. 232 strains were isolated which were further identified with the BD Phoenix™100 system; however, only 204 of these were identified as Staphylococcus spp., 28 of these were unidentified by MALDI-TOF MS. The Maldi Biotype software accurately identified 119 of these isolates at the species level and 85 at the genus level. BD Phoenix™100 demonstrated remarkable accuracy, identifying 100 % of the isolates as Staphylococcus aureus (39/39). In contrast, the MALDI-TOF MS method identified 94.8 % of the isolates as Staphylococcus aureus (37/39). Both identification systems confirmed a total of 37 strains of Staphylococcus aureus. We confirmed Staphylococcus aureus by PCR using the spa 83.7 % (31/37) and nuc 86.4 % (32/37) genes. Using the PCR method, we successfully detected the mecA 0.9 % (2/204), and the blaZ 17.6 % (36/204) gene for beta-lactam antibiotic resistance (beta-lactamase-penicillinase) but did not find mecC and PVL genes from any of the isolates. The antibiotic susceptibility test results were determined for all isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. This demonstrated that they exhibited the highest resistance to ampicillin 53.9 % and penicillin 52.4 %, followed by tetracycline 21.07 %, clindamycin 18.6 % and oxacillin 18.1 %. Additionally, a total of 18.6 % (38/204) isolates exhibited resistance to antibiotics belonging to more than three groups of antibiotics and were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). The results obtained from MALDI-TOF-MS showed a concordance rate of 41.7 % with the findings from the BD Phoenix™100, as confirmed by statistical analysis. This level of agreement indicates a significant divergence between the two methods. This discrepancy highlights the need for additional studies to thoroughly assess the comparative effectiveness and reliability of MALDI-TOF-MS and BD Phoenix™100 in identifying microbial species. Such evaluations could help determine the strengths and limitations of each method, ultimately guiding the laboratory and improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的主要目的是评估 BD Phoenix™100 和基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱法(MALDI-TOF MS)这两种细菌鉴定方法鉴定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的效率和准确性,并选出最可靠的方法。这项研究还加入了聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术,以提高 MRSA 检测的可靠性。为此,从不同牧场收集了 350 份牛奶样本,并采用盐富集培养法分离葡萄球菌。分离出的 232 株菌株经 BD Phoenix™100 系统进一步鉴定,但只有 204 株被鉴定为葡萄球菌属,其中 28 株通过 MALDI-TOF MS 无法鉴定。Maldi Biotype 软件对其中 119 个分离物进行了种级鉴定,对 85 个分离物进行了属级鉴定。BD Phoenix™100 的准确率非常高,100% 地将分离物鉴定为金黄色葡萄球菌(39/39)。相比之下,MALDI-TOF MS 方法可将 94.8% 的分离物鉴定为金黄色葡萄球菌(37/39)。两种鉴定系统共确认了 37 株金黄色葡萄球菌。我们通过聚合酶链式反应(PCR)方法,使用 spa 基因 83.7 %(31/37)和 nuc 基因 86.4 %(32/37)确认了金黄色葡萄球菌。通过 PCR 方法,我们成功地检测到了 mecA 0.9 %(2/204)和 blaZ 17.6 %(36/204)基因,这些基因用于检测对 beta-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药性(β-内酰胺酶-青霉素酶),但没有从任何分离株中发现 mecC 和 PVL 基因。采用柯比-鲍尔盘扩散法对所有分离物进行了抗生素药敏试验。结果表明,它们对氨苄西林和青霉素的耐药性最高,分别为 53.9 % 和 52.4 %,其次是四环素 21.07 %、克林霉素 18.6 % 和奥沙西林 18.1 %。此外,共有 18.6 %(38/204)的分离菌株表现出对三类以上抗生素的耐药性,被归类为多重耐药菌株(MDR)。经统计分析证实,MALDI-TOF-MS 得出的结果与 BD Phoenix™100 得出的结果吻合率为 41.7%。这种一致程度表明这两种方法之间存在显著差异。这种差异凸显出需要进行更多的研究,以全面评估 MALDI-TOF-MS 和 BD Phoenix™100 在鉴定微生物物种方面的比较有效性和可靠性。此类评估有助于确定每种方法的优势和局限性,最终为实验室提供指导并提高临床诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing detection methods for MRSA isolated from mastitis cases and assessing virulence genes Mucosal and systemic humoral responses after experimental Brucella abortus challenge in non-vaccinated or RB51-vaccinated elk Differential expression of Toll-like receptors and associated cytokines in the bursa of Eimeria tenella infected chickens Western Canadian cow-calf producers' perspectives about cattle welfare, handling, and training in cattle handling: A thematic analysis The development, validation and application of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae in lamb and ewe sera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1