Optimal Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colectomy: A Comparative Experimental Evaluation Using 3D Anastomosis Models

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/ases.70048
Yoshiaki Fujii, Seiya Yamamoto, Sho Kimura, Shogo Suzuki, Hirotaka Miyai, Hiroki Takahashi, Yoichi Matsuo, Kenji Kobayashi, Shuji Takiguchi
{"title":"Optimal Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colectomy: A Comparative Experimental Evaluation Using 3D Anastomosis Models","authors":"Yoshiaki Fujii,&nbsp;Seiya Yamamoto,&nbsp;Sho Kimura,&nbsp;Shogo Suzuki,&nbsp;Hirotaka Miyai,&nbsp;Hiroki Takahashi,&nbsp;Yoichi Matsuo,&nbsp;Kenji Kobayashi,&nbsp;Shuji Takiguchi","doi":"10.1111/ases.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Application of intracorporeal anastomosis is gradually becoming widespread; however, there are no detailed reports on its configuration. We aimed to create three-dimensional intracorporeal anastomosis models and compare their configurations in detail.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three types of intracorporeal anastomosis models were used: overlap anastomosis, delta-shaped anastomosis, and functional end-to-end anastomosis. In experiment 1, three-dimensional images of each anastomosis model were created. Additionally, the length of each staple line comprising the anastomotic site was measured. In experiment 2, the lengths of intestinal mobilization required for different anastomoses were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The circumference of the anastomosis in overlap anastomosis (141.5 ± 3.3 mm) was significantly greater than that in delta-shaped anastomosis (87.9 ± 0.9 mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (89.6 ± 10 mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The length of the intestinal tract after anastomosis in delta-shaped anastomosis (33 ± 6.9 mm) was significantly shorter than that in functional end-to-end anastomosis (76 ± 2 mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and overlap anastomosis (60 ± 5 mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We successfully constructed three-dimensional images of intracorporeal anastomosis models. These results suggest that overlap anastomosis led to the formation of the largest anastomotic site, while minimal bowel mobilization was required in the delta-shaped anastomosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ases.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Application of intracorporeal anastomosis is gradually becoming widespread; however, there are no detailed reports on its configuration. We aimed to create three-dimensional intracorporeal anastomosis models and compare their configurations in detail.

Methods

Three types of intracorporeal anastomosis models were used: overlap anastomosis, delta-shaped anastomosis, and functional end-to-end anastomosis. In experiment 1, three-dimensional images of each anastomosis model were created. Additionally, the length of each staple line comprising the anastomotic site was measured. In experiment 2, the lengths of intestinal mobilization required for different anastomoses were compared.

Results

The circumference of the anastomosis in overlap anastomosis (141.5 ± 3.3 mm) was significantly greater than that in delta-shaped anastomosis (87.9 ± 0.9 mm; p < 0.001) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (89.6 ± 10 mm; p < 0.0001). The length of the intestinal tract after anastomosis in delta-shaped anastomosis (33 ± 6.9 mm) was significantly shorter than that in functional end-to-end anastomosis (76 ± 2 mm; p < 0.0001) and overlap anastomosis (60 ± 5 mm; p < 0.002).

Conclusions

We successfully constructed three-dimensional images of intracorporeal anastomosis models. These results suggest that overlap anastomosis led to the formation of the largest anastomotic site, while minimal bowel mobilization was required in the delta-shaped anastomosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引言 体腔内吻合术的应用正逐渐广泛,但有关其构造的详细报道却不多。我们旨在创建三维体腔内吻合术模型,并详细比较其构造。 方法 我们使用了三种体腔内吻合术模型:重叠吻合术、三角型吻合术和功能性端对端吻合术。实验 1 制作了每种吻合模型的三维图像。此外,还测量了吻合部位每条缝合线的长度。在实验 2 中,比较了不同吻合术所需的肠道移动长度。 结果 重叠吻合术的吻合口周长(141.5 ± 3.3 mm)明显大于三角吻合术(87.9 ± 0.9 mm; p < 0.001)和功能性端对端吻合术(89.6 ± 10 mm; p < 0.0001)。三角吻合术吻合后的肠道长度(33 ± 6.9 mm)明显短于功能性端端吻合术(76 ± 2 mm;p <;0.0001)和重叠吻合术(60 ± 5 mm;p <;0.002)。 结论 我们成功构建了体腔内吻合模型的三维图像。这些结果表明,重叠吻合可形成最大的吻合部位,而三角型吻合则需要最小的肠道移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Optimal Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colectomy: A Comparative Experimental Evaluation Using 3D Anastomosis Models Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach Usefulness of Bidirectional Barbed Sutures for Temporary Closure of Entry Hole for Delta-Shaped Anastomosis in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy Laparoscopic Donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy Using the Glissonean Pedicle Approach: Technical Details With Video A Novel Port and Arm Placement Strategy for the Hugo Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System in Gynecologic Oncology: Initial Experience and Technical Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1