Agreement of precordial and subclavian Doppler ultrasound venous gas emboli grades in a large diving data set.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.28920/dhm55.1.2-10
S Lesley Blogg, Arian Azarang, Virginie Papadopoulou, Peter Lindholm
{"title":"Agreement of precordial and subclavian Doppler ultrasound venous gas emboli grades in a large diving data set.","authors":"S Lesley Blogg, Arian Azarang, Virginie Papadopoulou, Peter Lindholm","doi":"10.28920/dhm55.1.2-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Doppler ultrasound is used to detect inert gas bubbles in the body following decompression from dives. Two sites may be monitored, the precordial (PC) and subclavian (SC) positions. PC is the predominant site, allowing observation of bubbles returning from the entire body. However, the SC site provides unambiguous signals, whereas the PC site is noisy and difficult to grade. This retrospective study compared agreement of PC and SC Doppler data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Datasets from the large University of California at San Diego Doppler database were graded on the Kisman Masurel (KM) scale and included: one PC measurement at rest followed by three during movement (n = 4 measurements); this was repeated for the left (n = 4 measurements) and right (n = 4 measurements) SC veins, producing a set of 12 grades. Primary analysis included: agreement between resting PC and SC grades, between movement PC and SC grades, and for unmatched grades, whether the SC grade was higher or lower than PC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-hundred and fifty-three datasets were available (5,436 individual recordings). At rest, 281 (62.0%) PC and SC grades matched (weighted kappa agreement 0.33, 95% CI ± 0.04), while only 176 (38.9%) movement grades matched (0.29, ± 0.02). Of the unmatched data, resting SC grades were higher than PC in 70.3% and lower in 29.6%; after movement, SC grades were higher in 45.8% and lower in 54.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data revealed a large discrepancy between PC and SC grades. Overall, this suggests that Doppler observations from both positions will give the most comprehensive representation of bubble load.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"55 1","pages":"2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm55.1.2-10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Doppler ultrasound is used to detect inert gas bubbles in the body following decompression from dives. Two sites may be monitored, the precordial (PC) and subclavian (SC) positions. PC is the predominant site, allowing observation of bubbles returning from the entire body. However, the SC site provides unambiguous signals, whereas the PC site is noisy and difficult to grade. This retrospective study compared agreement of PC and SC Doppler data.

Methods: Datasets from the large University of California at San Diego Doppler database were graded on the Kisman Masurel (KM) scale and included: one PC measurement at rest followed by three during movement (n = 4 measurements); this was repeated for the left (n = 4 measurements) and right (n = 4 measurements) SC veins, producing a set of 12 grades. Primary analysis included: agreement between resting PC and SC grades, between movement PC and SC grades, and for unmatched grades, whether the SC grade was higher or lower than PC.

Results: Four-hundred and fifty-three datasets were available (5,436 individual recordings). At rest, 281 (62.0%) PC and SC grades matched (weighted kappa agreement 0.33, 95% CI ± 0.04), while only 176 (38.9%) movement grades matched (0.29, ± 0.02). Of the unmatched data, resting SC grades were higher than PC in 70.3% and lower in 29.6%; after movement, SC grades were higher in 45.8% and lower in 54.2%.

Conclusions: These data revealed a large discrepancy between PC and SC grades. Overall, this suggests that Doppler observations from both positions will give the most comprehensive representation of bubble load.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Agreement of precordial and subclavian Doppler ultrasound venous gas emboli grades in a large diving data set. Dive Medicine Capability at Rothera Research Station (British Antarctic Survey), Adelaide Island, Antarctica. Divers with large or normal lungs: is the difference justified? A case of facial vascular occlusion after hyaluronic acid cosmetic filler injection treated with adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen. Diving-related fatalities in Victoria, Australia, 2000 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1